Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 09;11:1132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01132. eCollection 2020.

The Dark Side of Emotion Recognition - Evidence From Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and China.

Frontiers in psychology

Helena S Schmitt, Cornelia Sindermann, Mei Li, Yina Ma, Keith M Kendrick, Benjamin Becker, Christian Montag

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
  2. Student Counseling Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China.
  3. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
  4. The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

PMID: 32733302 PMCID: PMC7363803 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01132

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The dark triad of personality (DT) comprises three antisocial personality traits (i.e., narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) that are characterized by callousness and the motive to elevate the self while derogating other people. Previous research indicates that the positive relationship between the DT traits and interpersonally deviant behaviors is especially pronounced at high levels of emotional abilities. This has also been referred to as dark Emotional Intelligence (EI). Since prior studies predominantly examined dark EI via trait-approach, the present study targeted at providing evidence for dark EI using a behavioral measure of EI, namely emotion recognition performance. In order to study the robustness and cross-cultural validity of findings, parallel investigations were conducted in Germany and China.

METHODS: A total of

RESULTS: Effects were highly gender- and culture-dependent. Among German females, Machiavellianism and narcissism showed the strongest positive associations with emotionally manipulative tactics at high levels of emotion recognition performance. A similar pattern of results was found among German males for psychopathy. None of the effects was observed in the Chinese female or male samples.

DISCUSSION: The present findings indicate that emotional abilities may constitute risk factors with the potential to promote rather than to prevent deviant behaviors especially in samples from Western cultures with pronounced scores on DT personality traits. Limitations and psychometric properties are discussed.

Copyright © 2020 Schmitt, Sindermann, Li, Ma, Kendrick, Becker and Montag.

Keywords: Emotional Manipulation; cross-cultural; dark EI; dark triad of personality; emotion recognition; reading the mind in the eyes test

References

  1. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):205-19 - PubMed
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):517-523 - PubMed
  4. Am Psychol. 1997 May;52(5):509-16 - PubMed
  5. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov;36(10):2288-304 - PubMed
  6. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2017 Dec;174(8):808-816 - PubMed
  7. Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):1008-1023 - PubMed
  8. Personal Disord. 2018 Mar;9(2):101-111 - PubMed
  9. J Pers Disord. 2006 Apr;20(2):139-56; discussion 181-5 - PubMed
  10. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):951-968 - PubMed
  11. Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Dec;38:31-32 - PubMed
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):132-45 - PubMed
  13. J Pers Disord. 2016 Aug;30(4):436-50 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 2010 Jul 1;466(7302):29 - PubMed
  15. J Pers. 1991 Jun;59(2):179-215 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Jun;85(3):349-60 - PubMed
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233 - PubMed
  18. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Sep;16(3):293-307 - PubMed
  19. Behav Sci Law. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):557-74 - PubMed
  20. J Pers. 2019 Dec;87(6):1250-1263 - PubMed
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):854-78 - PubMed
  22. J Pers. 2017 Aug;85(4):439-453 - PubMed
  23. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:464 - PubMed
  24. Am J Psychother. 1986 Apr;40(2):189-200 - PubMed
  25. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Rep. 1979 Oct;45(2):590 - PubMed
  27. J Pers. 2015 Dec;83(6):644-64 - PubMed
  28. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Aug;125(6):818-823 - PubMed
  29. Psychol Assess. 2020 Feb;32(2):182-196 - PubMed
  30. Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90 - PubMed
  31. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jan;12(1):18-23 - PubMed
  32. Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):28-41 - PubMed
  33. PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177239 - PubMed
  34. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:133-60 - PubMed
  35. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 - PubMed
  36. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug 03;12:148 - PubMed
  37. J Med Philos. 1992 Apr;17(2):173-97 - PubMed
  38. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1005-18 - PubMed
  39. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):183-204 - PubMed
  40. Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1073-80 - PubMed
  41. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 06;6:1503 - PubMed
  42. Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2201-9 - PubMed
  43. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1219-29 - PubMed
  44. Br J Psychol. 1986 Aug;77 ( Pt 3):305-27 - PubMed
  45. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):151-8 - PubMed
  46. Front Psychol. 2014 May 13;5:404 - PubMed

Publication Types