Display options
Share it on

J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 07;9(8). doi: 10.3390/jcm9082561.

Prevalence of Myofascial Trigger Points in Patients with Mild to Moderate Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: A Secondary Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine

Eleuterio A Sánchez Romero, Josué Fernández Carnero, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, César Calvo-Lobo, Victoria Ochoa Sáez, Verónica Burgos Caballero, Sofia Laguarta Val, Paolo Pedersini, Daniel Pecos Martín

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
  2. Musculoskeletal Pain and Motor Control Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain.
  3. Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Madrid, Spain.
  4. La Paz Hospital Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  5. Grupo Multidisciplinar de Investigación y Tratamiento del Dolor, Grupo de Excelencia Investigadora URJC-Banco de Santander, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
  6. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
  7. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  8. Older-adult care center "Manuel Herranz", Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
  9. Department of Physical Therapy of Alcalá University, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain.

PMID: 32784592 PMCID: PMC7464556 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082561

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and the correlation between the number of MTrPs and pain and function in patients presenting knee pain osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional study. The prevalence of MTrPs located in tensor fasciae latae, hip adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and popliteus muscles was studied in 114 patients (71 men and 43 women) with knee OA. Pain and functionality were assessed with a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), the Western Ontario, McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Barthel Index, and the timed up and go test.

RESULTS: The prevalence of latent MTrPs was detected via palpation and was estimated to be 50%, 35%, 25%, 29%, 33%, and 12% for tensor fasciae latae, hip adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and popliteus muscles, respectively. The prevalence of active MTrPs was estimated to be 11%, 17%, 30%, 18%, 25%, and 17% for tensor fasciae latae, hip adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and popliteus muscles, respectively. Pain was measured with the NPRS scale and was poorly correlated with the prevalence of latent MTrPs (r = 0.2;

CONCLUSIONS: This secondary analysis found that the prevalence of the MTrPs varied from 11% to 50% in different muscles of patients with mild to moderate painful knee osteoarthritis. Pain was correlated poorly with the prevalence of latent and active MTrPs in the hamstring muscles, and disability correlated moderately with the number of latent MTrPs in tensor fasciae latae.

Keywords: knee; myofascial pain; osteoarthritis

References

  1. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Oct;6(10):599-606 - PubMed
  2. Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb;38(2):583-584 - PubMed
  3. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1043-56 - PubMed
  4. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Feb;85(2):284-9 - PubMed
  5. Rehabil Nurs. 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):55-61 - PubMed
  6. Eur J Pain. 2014 Nov;18(10):1367-75 - PubMed
  7. Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):142-150 - PubMed
  8. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Oct;20(10):1075-85 - PubMed
  9. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;68(3):654-61 - PubMed
  10. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:694941 - PubMed
  11. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S2-15 - PubMed
  12. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991 Feb;27:10-2 - PubMed
  13. Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):349-363 - PubMed
  14. Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):165-173 - PubMed
  15. Pain. 2002 Nov;100(1-2):55-64 - PubMed
  16. Pain Res Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):321-7 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2015 Jul 25;386(9991):376-87 - PubMed
  18. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 May-Jun;36(3):513 - PubMed
  19. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Aug;26(3):387-99 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 29;9(7): - PubMed
  21. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014 Jan;16(1):395 - PubMed
  22. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 Mar;105(12):214-9 - PubMed
  23. Pain Med. 2019 Aug 1;20(8):1461-1463 - PubMed
  24. J Pain Res. 2019 Jun 18;12:1899-1911 - PubMed
  25. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Apr;74(4):682-8 - PubMed
  26. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Nov;99(5):1977-84 - PubMed
  27. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):168-76 - PubMed
  28. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804 - PubMed
  29. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jun;51:102443 - PubMed
  30. Age Ageing. 2009 Mar;38(2):181-7 - PubMed
  31. Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;91(12):1849-56 - PubMed
  32. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502 - PubMed
  33. Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Nov;21(6):466-71 - PubMed
  34. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):573-81 - PubMed
  35. Acupunct Med. 2008 Mar;26(1):17-26 - PubMed
  36. Clin J Pain. 2007 Jun;23(5):440-8 - PubMed
  37. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 May;38(4):262-8 - PubMed
  38. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jul;21(3):642-647 - PubMed
  39. Eur J Nutr. 2019 Mar;58(2):565-581 - PubMed
  40. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Jun 1;89(11):918-20 - PubMed
  41. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Mar-Apr;26(2):324-32 - PubMed
  42. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1243-52 - PubMed
  43. Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;93(6):842-51 - PubMed
  44. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Nov;60(11):1040-5 - PubMed
  45. PM R. 2019 Oct;11(10):1077-1082 - PubMed
  46. Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1196-207 - PubMed
  47. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30 - PubMed
  48. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31 - PubMed

Publication Types