Display options
Share it on

Transplant Direct. 2020 Jul 17;6(8):e585. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001036. eCollection 2020 Aug.

Development of a Patient-specific Search of Transplant Program Outcomes and Characteristics: Feedback From Kidney Transplant Patients.

Transplantation direct

Warren T McKinney, Cory R Schaffhausen, Marilyn J Bruin, Sauman Chu, David Schladt, Arthur Matas, Jon Snyder, Bertram Kasiske, Ajay K Israni

Affiliations

  1. Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN.
  2. College of Design, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  3. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN.
  4. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  5. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  6. Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

PMID: 32766433 PMCID: PMC7371071 DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001036

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients face obstacles in finding a transplant program that meets their healthcare needs. Acceptance criteria and waiting times vary by region and program. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients provides program-specific information, but it is unclear what patients and referring physicians need to know.

METHODS: We examined variability in program-specific characteristics that could influence access to transplantation. We also conducted 20 interviews and 16 focus groups with transplant candidates, recipients, and their family members. Participants were shown prototypes of a patient-specific search tool and evaluated its capacity to identify programs tailored to the needs of individual patients.

RESULTS: The distribution of recipient and donor characteristics that may impact access to transplantation, such as recipients on Medicaid, varied across programs (all with

CONCLUSIONS: Providing patient-specific tools is valued by patients and important to maximizing access to transplant.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Transpl Int. 2015 Jul;28(7):771-87 - PubMed
  2. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Nov;29(11):2144-50 - PubMed
  3. Inquiry. 2006 Summer;43(2):150-9 - PubMed
  4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Feb;19(2):349-55 - PubMed
  5. Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1979-1991 - PubMed
  6. Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Jun;67(3):275-93 - PubMed
  7. Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1301-1302 - PubMed
  8. Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2781-2790 - PubMed
  9. Clin Transplant. 2017 Dec;31(12): - PubMed
  10. Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):146-53 - PubMed
  11. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:413-33 - PubMed
  12. Clin Transplant. 2019 May;33(5):e13523 - PubMed
  13. Clin Transplant. 2017 Jul;31(7): - PubMed
  14. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 - PubMed
  15. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117 - PubMed
  16. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1760-7 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support