Display options
Share it on

Orthop Res Rev. 2020 Aug 20;12:113-119. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S254551. eCollection 2020.

Effect of the Extent of Release for Knee Balancing on Post-Operative Limb Coronal Alignment After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Orthopedic research and reviews

Mohammad M Alzahrani, Thomas J Wood, Lyndsay E Somerville, Steven J MacDonald, James L Howard, Edward M Vasarhelyi, Brent A Lanting

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  3. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre University Campus, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada.

PMID: 32904187 PMCID: PMC7450654 DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S254551

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes and longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depend mainly on restoring knee function, through precise bony resection and appropriate soft tissue balancing. The current literature lacks evidence regarding the degree of radiographic change after intra-operative knee balancing. The purpose of our study was to assess the degree of change in coronal lower extremity alignment by comparing pre-operative to post-operative full-length radiographs (FLR) after quantifying the degree of intra-operative knee balancing and correlate patient-reported outcomes to the extent of balancing required.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four patients undergoing primary TKA for varus knee osteoarthritis were included in the study. The performed soft tissue releases and bony adjustments to obtain a balanced TKA intra-operatively were prospectively documented and were grouped into minimal, moderate and extensive release groups. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), anatomical femoral-tibial angle (FTA), condylar hip angle (CH), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and condylar plateau angle (CPA) were measured on full-length radiographs both pre-operatively and post-operatively. Frequencies of the soft tissue releases and bony resections in addition to descriptive statistics of the measured angles on the radiographs were recorded. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) were compared between the grouped patients.

RESULTS: Of those that were included in the study, 66 knees (42.9%) required minimal release to adequately balance the knee, while 70 (45.5%) required moderate release and 18 (11.7%) required extensive release. No statistically significant differences were found in change of alignment between the groups for all the measured angles. In addition, no difference in PROMs was seen between the groups both pre- and post-operatively.

CONCLUSION: Although we found no association between post-operative coronal alignment of a TKA and the degree of soft tissue release and bony resection, this likely represents the fact that a balanced TKA is dynamic and not dependent on change of single radiographic parameters. Patient-reported outcomes were not impacted by the extent of releases.

© 2020 Alzahrani et al.

Keywords: alignment; balancing; knee arthroplasty; outcomes; soft tissue

Conflict of interest statement

Lyndsay E Somerville reports institutional support from Smith and Nephew, Depuy, Zimmer, Stryker, outside the submitted work. Steven J MacDonald reports personal fees from DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson C

References

  1. Orthopedics. 2007 Apr;30(4):299-303 - PubMed
  2. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2475-2479 - PubMed
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Sep;73(5):709-14 - PubMed
  4. J Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;34(9):1796-801 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Feb;90(2):159-65 - PubMed
  6. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991 Jun;66(6):589-95 - PubMed
  7. J Orthop Res. 2014 May;32(5):627-32 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):124-30 - PubMed
  9. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Jun 1;27(11):e516-e521 - PubMed
  10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jul;(388):18-25 - PubMed
  11. J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):349-55 - PubMed
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):203-7 - PubMed
  13. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):102-5 - PubMed
  14. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Aug;20(5):585-90 - PubMed
  15. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Dec;17(12):766-74 - PubMed
  16. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):878-82 - PubMed
  17. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):1-8 - PubMed
  18. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):950-4 - PubMed
  19. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):75-78 - PubMed
  20. J Orthop Res. 2017 Sep;35(9):2031-2039 - PubMed
  21. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4 Suppl 1):44-9 - PubMed
  22. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):39-43 - PubMed
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 15;92(12):2143-9 - PubMed
  24. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):144-9 - PubMed
  25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:83-7 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1227-36 - PubMed
  27. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):381-7 - PubMed
  28. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Dec;64(9):1317-23 - PubMed
  29. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):45-53 - PubMed
  30. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:295-304 - PubMed
  31. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):232-8 - PubMed

Publication Types