Display options
Cite
Greatrix R, Dowell J. UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):292doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1.
Greatrix, R., & Dowell, J. (2020). UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?. BMC medical education, 20(1), 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1
Greatrix, Rachel, and Dowell, Jonathan. "UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?." BMC medical education vol. 20,1 (2020): 292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1
Greatrix R, Dowell J. UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 05;20(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1. PMID: 32891164; PMCID: PMC7487558.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 05;20(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1.

UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK - what has changed since 2006?.

BMC medical education

Rachel Greatrix, Jonathan Dowell

Affiliations

  1. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. [email protected].
  2. University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

PMID: 32891164 PMCID: PMC7487558 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is an aptitude test used since 2006 within selection processes of a consortium of UK medical and dental schools. Since 2006, student numbers have increased in medical training and schools now have an increased focus on widening access. A growing evidence base has emerged around medical student selection (Patterson et al., Med Educ 50:36-60, 2016) leading to changes in practice. However, whilst some papers describe local selection processes, there has been no overview of trends in selection processes over time across Universities. This study reports on how the use of the UKCAT in medical student selection has changed and comments on other changes in selection processes.

METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted annually with UKCAT Consortium medical schools. Use of the UKCAT was categorised and data analysed to identify trends over time.

RESULTS: The number of schools using the UKCAT to select applicants for interview has risen, with cognitive test results contributing significantly to outcomes at this stage at many universities. Where schools use different weighted criteria (Factor Method), the UKCAT has largely replaced the use of personal statements. Use of the test at offer stage has also increased; the most significant use being to discriminate between applicants at a decision borderline. A growing number of schools are using the UKCAT Situational Judgement Test (SJT) in selection. In 2018, all but seven (out of 26) schools made some adjustment to selection processes for widening access applicants. Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) are now used by the majority of schools. Whilst medical student numbers have increased over this time, the ratio of applicants to places has fallen. The probability of applicants being invited to interview or receiving an offer has increased.

CONCLUSIONS: More medical schools are using the UKCAT in undergraduate selection processes in an increasing number of ways and with increasing weight compared with 2007. It has replaced the use of personal statements in all but a few Consortium medical schools. An increased focus on academic attainment and the UKCAT across medical schools may be leading to the need for schools to interview and make offers to more applicants.

Keywords: Medical student admissions; Medical student selection; UKCAT

References

  1. BMJ. 2010 Nov 02;341:c6108 - PubMed
  2. BMJ Open. 2018 May 23;8(5):e020291 - PubMed
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 23;14:88 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 11;14:116 - PubMed
  5. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Nov 24;11:98 - PubMed
  6. BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):6 - PubMed
  7. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jan 08;14:7 - PubMed
  8. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 8;8(10):e023274 - PubMed
  9. Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1091-1101 - PubMed
  10. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):868-80 - PubMed
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jul 28;10:55 - PubMed
  12. BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):1005-9 - PubMed
  13. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 08;12:69 - PubMed
  14. BMJ. 2012 Apr 17;344:e1805 - PubMed
  15. BMC Med. 2013 Nov 14;11:244 - PubMed
  16. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 26;13:32 - PubMed
  17. Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60 - PubMed
  18. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 7;6(10):e011313 - PubMed
  19. Med Educ. 2016 Oct;50(10):1033-44 - PubMed
  20. BMC Med. 2016 Sep 26;14(1):140 - PubMed
  21. Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):717-25 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support