Porcine Health Manag. 2020 Sep 08;6:23. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00161-3. eCollection 2020.
Objective pathogen monitoring in nursery and finisher pigs by monthly laboratory diagnostic testing.
Porcine health management
Nicole B Goecke, Maja Kobberø, Thomas K Kusk, Charlotte K Hjulsager, Ken Steen Pedersen, Charlotte S Kristensen, Lars E Larsen
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Centre for Diagnostics, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
- Present address: University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
- Present address: Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
- Ø-Vet A/S, 4700 Næstved, Denmark.
- SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre, 1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark.
PMID: 32922832
PMCID: PMC7476771 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-020-00161-3
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases are of great economic importance in commercial pig production, causing both clinical and subclinical disease, with influence on welfare, productivity, and antibiotic use. The causes of these diseases are often multifactorial and laboratory diagnostics are seldom routinely performed. The aim of the present study was to explore the benefits of monthly pathogen monitoring in nursery and finisher herds and to examine association between laboratory results and observed clinical signs, including coughing and diarrhoea. Three monthly samplings were conducted in three different age groups in six nursery and four finisher production units. For each unit, two pens were randomly selected in each age group and evaluated for coughing and diarrhoea events. Furthermore, faecal sock and oral fluid samples were collected in the selected pens and analysed for 18 respiratory and enteric viral and bacterial pathogens using the high-throughput real-time PCR BioMark HD platform (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, USA).
RESULTS: In total, 174 pens were sampled in which eight coughing events and 77 diarrhoeic events were observed. The overall findings showed that swine influenza A virus, porcine circovirus 2, porcine cytomegalovirus,
CONCLUSIONS: The use of high-throughput real-time PCR analysis for continuous monitoring of pathogens and thereby dynamics of infections in a pig herd, provided the veterinarian and farmer with an objective knowledge on the distribution of pathogens in the herd. In addition, the use of a high-throughput method in combination with information about clinical signs, productivity, health status and antibiotic consumption, presents a new and innovative way of diagnosing and monitoring pig herds and even to a lower cost than the traditional method.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Keywords: Coughing; Diagnostics; Diarrhoea; Enteric bacteria; Enteric viruses; High-throughput real-time PCR; Monitoring; Respiratory bacteria; Respiratory viruses
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsNG is employed by the Technical University of Denmark that may benefit commercially by the use of the system described in the study. CK works for SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre. T
References
- Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2001 Nov;17(3):551-65 - PubMed
- J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020 Jan;32(1):51-64 - PubMed
- Virus Res. 2012 Mar;164(1-2):10-9 - PubMed
- J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Apr;97(2):207-37 - PubMed
- Res Vet Sci. 2019 Dec;127:47-56 - PubMed
- Front Vet Sci. 2018 Dec 12;5:315 - PubMed
- J Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;174 Suppl 1:S98-106 - PubMed
- Vet Rec. 2015 Jan 31;176(5):124 - PubMed
- Virus Res. 2016 Dec 2;226:1-6 - PubMed
- Ir Vet J. 2014 Nov 01;67(1):24 - PubMed
- Res Vet Sci. 2000 Feb;68(1):9-13 - PubMed
- Porcine Health Manag. 2017 Apr 5;3:7 - PubMed
- Vet Res. 2019 May 22;50(1):36 - PubMed
- J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1978 Feb 15;172(4):458-63 - PubMed
- Vet Microbiol. 2013 May 3;163(3-4):242-7 - PubMed
- Prev Vet Med. 2011 Mar 1;98(4):288-91 - PubMed
- Res Vet Sci. 2003 Apr;74(2):163-9 - PubMed
- Vet Microbiol. 2009 Jan 1;133(1-2):172-8 - PubMed
- Viruses. 2020 Feb 23;12(2): - PubMed
- Vet J. 2015 Oct;206(1):30-8 - PubMed
- Vaccine. 2007 Sep 28;25(39-40):6852-62 - PubMed
- Virol J. 2016 Nov 11;13(1):184 - PubMed
- J Comp Pathol. 2006 Nov;135(4):176-82 - PubMed
- Vet J. 2003 Nov;166(3):251-6 - PubMed
- Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Jun;65(3):602-606 - PubMed
- Anim Health Res Rev. 2011 Dec;12(2):133-48 - PubMed
- Prev Vet Med. 2015 Jul 1;120(3-4):313-20 - PubMed
- Vet J. 2015 Jul;205(1):93-7 - PubMed
- Prev Vet Med. 2000 Sep 1;46(4):279-92 - PubMed
- Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jan 1;108(1):63-72 - PubMed
- J Comp Pathol. 2010 Aug-Oct;143(2-3):120-31 - PubMed
- Vet J. 2000 Jan;159(1):37-56 - PubMed
- Vet Microbiol. 2017 May;203:18-27 - PubMed
- Acta Vet Scand. 2015 Sep 30;57:64 - PubMed
- Vet Q. 1992 Jan;14(1):29-34 - PubMed
- Anim Health Res Rev. 2010 Dec;11(2):207-16 - PubMed
- Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Jun;4(6):337-48 - PubMed
- J Virol Methods. 2017 May;243:190-195 - PubMed
- Vet J. 2012 Aug;193(2):443-7 - PubMed
- Anim Health Res Rev. 2005 Dec;6(2):119-42 - PubMed
- Int J Biometeorol. 2012 Nov;56(6):1167-71 - PubMed
- J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Nov;44 Suppl B:3-9 - PubMed
Publication Types