Chin Neurosurg J. 2018 Dec 21;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s41016-018-0146-3. eCollection 2018.
Cranial nerve monitoring in endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors (observing of 23 cases).
Chinese neurosurgical journal
A N Shkarubo, I V Chernov, A A Ogurtsova, V E Chernov, O V Borisov, K V Koval, D N Andreev
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Neurooncology, Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Neurophysiology, Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Neurosurgery, N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
- Laboratory of Molecular Human Genetics, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
PMID: 32922898
PMCID: PMC7398298 DOI: 10.1186/s41016-018-0146-3
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preservation of anatomic integrity and function of the cranial nerves during the removal of skull base tumors is one of the most challenging procedures in endoscopic endonasal surgery. It is possible to use intraoperative mapping and identification of the cranial nerves in order to facilitate their preservation.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative trigger electromyography in prevention of iatrogenic damage to the cranial nerves.
METHODS: Twenty three patients with various skull base tumors (chordomas, neuromas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, cholesteatomas) underwent mapping and identification of cranial nerves during tumor removal using the endoscopic endonasal approach in Department of Neurooncology of Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from 2013 to 2018. During the surgical interventions, mapping and identification of the cranial nerves were carried out using electromyography in triggered mode. The effectiveness of the method was evaluated based on a comparison with a control group (41 patients).
RESULTS: In the main group of patients, 44 nerves were examined during surgery using triggered electromyography. During the study, the III, V, VI, VII, and XII cranial nerves were identified intraoperatively. Postoperative cranial nerve deficiency was observed in 5 patients in the study group and in 13 patients in the control group. The average length of hospitalization was 9 days.
CONCLUSION: We did not receive statistically significant data supporting the fact that intraoperative identification of cranial nerves using trigger electromyography reduces the incidence of postoperative complications in the form of cranial nerve deficits (
© The Author(s) 2018.
Keywords: Electromyography; Endoscopic endonasal approach; Intraoperative cranial nerve identification; Skull base tumor surgery; T-EMG
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons64-76; discussion ons76 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2010 Sep;67(3 Suppl Operative):ons108-18; discussion ons118-9 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2011 May;30(5):E2 - PubMed
- Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Sep 18;92(35):2506-8 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6 Suppl Operative):211-9; discussion 219-20 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1):36-52; discussion 52-4 - PubMed
- Skull Base Surg. 1995;5(3):169-75 - PubMed
- J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012 Aug;73(4):236-44 - PubMed
- Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;103(2):72-82 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E3 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2004 Jul;55(1):239-44; discussion 244-6 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Feb;17(2):147-155 - PubMed
- Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:1751245 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg. 1986 Jun;64(6):879-89 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E4 - PubMed
- Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(7):751-6; discussion 756-7 - PubMed
- Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Feb;62(2):92-102 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2004 Sep;55(3):539-47; discussion 547-50 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E6 - PubMed
- World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:230-238 - PubMed
- Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;117(1-2):66-9 - PubMed
- Surg Neurol. 1995 Feb;43(2):177-81 - PubMed
- Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;47(1):1-8 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;93(4):586-93 - PubMed
- J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;28(6):543-50 - PubMed
- J Clin Neurol. 2013 Oct;9(4):244-51 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 1993 Feb;32(2):227-35; discussion 235 - PubMed
- Neurosurg Focus. 2011 May;30(5):E1 - PubMed
- Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):891-6 - PubMed
- Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 1;51(1):49-53 - PubMed
- Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62(3):556-63; discussion 556-63 - PubMed
Publication Types