Display options
Share it on

Chin Neurosurg J. 2018 Dec 21;4:38. doi: 10.1186/s41016-018-0146-3. eCollection 2018.

Cranial nerve monitoring in endoscopic endonasal surgery of skull base tumors (observing of 23 cases).

Chinese neurosurgical journal

A N Shkarubo, I V Chernov, A A Ogurtsova, V E Chernov, O V Borisov, K V Koval, D N Andreev

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurooncology, Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  2. Department of Neurophysiology, Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Department of Neurosurgery, N.N. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Laboratory of Molecular Human Genetics, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.

PMID: 32922898 PMCID: PMC7398298 DOI: 10.1186/s41016-018-0146-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preservation of anatomic integrity and function of the cranial nerves during the removal of skull base tumors is one of the most challenging procedures in endoscopic endonasal surgery. It is possible to use intraoperative mapping and identification of the cranial nerves in order to facilitate their preservation.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative trigger electromyography in prevention of iatrogenic damage to the cranial nerves.

METHODS: Twenty three patients with various skull base tumors (chordomas, neuromas, pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, cholesteatomas) underwent mapping and identification of cranial nerves during tumor removal using the endoscopic endonasal approach in Department of Neurooncology of Federal State Autonomous Institution "N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from 2013 to 2018. During the surgical interventions, mapping and identification of the cranial nerves were carried out using electromyography in triggered mode. The effectiveness of the method was evaluated based on a comparison with a control group (41 patients).

RESULTS: In the main group of patients, 44 nerves were examined during surgery using triggered electromyography. During the study, the III, V, VI, VII, and XII cranial nerves were identified intraoperatively. Postoperative cranial nerve deficiency was observed in 5 patients in the study group and in 13 patients in the control group. The average length of hospitalization was 9 days.

CONCLUSION: We did not receive statistically significant data supporting the fact that intraoperative identification of cranial nerves using trigger electromyography reduces the incidence of postoperative complications in the form of cranial nerve deficits (

© The Author(s) 2018.

Keywords: Electromyography; Endoscopic endonasal approach; Intraoperative cranial nerve identification; Skull base tumor surgery; T-EMG

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons64-76; discussion ons76 - PubMed
  2. Neurosurgery. 2010 Sep;67(3 Suppl Operative):ons108-18; discussion ons118-9 - PubMed
  3. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 May;30(5):E2 - PubMed
  4. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Sep 18;92(35):2506-8 - PubMed
  5. Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6 Suppl Operative):211-9; discussion 219-20 - PubMed
  6. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1):36-52; discussion 52-4 - PubMed
  7. Skull Base Surg. 1995;5(3):169-75 - PubMed
  8. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012 Aug;73(4):236-44 - PubMed
  9. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;103(2):72-82 - PubMed
  10. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E3 - PubMed
  11. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jul;55(1):239-44; discussion 244-6 - PubMed
  12. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Feb;17(2):147-155 - PubMed
  13. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:1751245 - PubMed
  14. J Neurosurg. 1986 Jun;64(6):879-89 - PubMed
  15. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E4 - PubMed
  16. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(7):751-6; discussion 756-7 - PubMed
  17. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Feb;62(2):92-102 - PubMed
  18. Neurosurgery. 2004 Sep;55(3):539-47; discussion 547-50 - PubMed
  19. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E6 - PubMed
  20. World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:230-238 - PubMed
  21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;117(1-2):66-9 - PubMed
  22. Surg Neurol. 1995 Feb;43(2):177-81 - PubMed
  23. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;47(1):1-8 - PubMed
  24. J Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;93(4):586-93 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;28(6):543-50 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Neurol. 2013 Oct;9(4):244-51 - PubMed
  27. Neurosurgery. 1993 Feb;32(2):227-35; discussion 235 - PubMed
  28. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 May;30(5):E1 - PubMed
  29. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012 Sep;114(7):891-6 - PubMed
  30. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan 1;51(1):49-53 - PubMed
  31. Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62(3):556-63; discussion 556-63 - PubMed

Publication Types