Display options
Cite
Doornewaard R, Bruyn H, Matthys C, et al. The Long-Term Effect of Adapting the Vertical Position of Implants on Peri-Implant Health: A 5-Year Intra-Subject Comparison in the Edentulous Mandible Including Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10)doi: 10.3390/jcm9103320.
Doornewaard, R., Bruyn, H., Matthys, C., Bronkhorst, E., Vandeweghe, S., & Vervaeke, S. (2020). The Long-Term Effect of Adapting the Vertical Position of Implants on Peri-Implant Health: A 5-Year Intra-Subject Comparison in the Edentulous Mandible Including Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(10), . https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103320
Doornewaard, Ron, et al. "The Long-Term Effect of Adapting the Vertical Position of Implants on Peri-Implant Health: A 5-Year Intra-Subject Comparison in the Edentulous Mandible Including Oral Health-Related Quality of Life." Journal of clinical medicine vol. 9,10 (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103320
Doornewaard R, Bruyn H, Matthys C, Bronkhorst E, Vandeweghe S, Vervaeke S. The Long-Term Effect of Adapting the Vertical Position of Implants on Peri-Implant Health: A 5-Year Intra-Subject Comparison in the Edentulous Mandible Including Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 16;9(10). doi: 10.3390/jcm9103320. PMID: 33081103; PMCID: PMC7602860.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 16;9(10). doi: 10.3390/jcm9103320.

The Long-Term Effect of Adapting the Vertical Position of Implants on Peri-Implant Health: A 5-Year Intra-Subject Comparison in the Edentulous Mandible Including Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.

Journal of clinical medicine

Ron Doornewaard, Hugo de Bruyn, Carine Matthys, Ewald Bronkhorst, Stefan Vandeweghe, Stijn Vervaeke

Affiliations

  1. Department Periodontology & Oral Implantology, Dental School, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
  2. Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  3. Department Reconstructive Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

PMID: 33081103 PMCID: PMC7602860 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103320

Abstract

Despite high success rates of dental implants, surface exposure may occur as a consequence of biologic width establishment associated with surgery. This prospective split-mouth study evaluated the effect of early implant surface exposure caused by initial bone remodeling on long-term peri-implant bone stability and peri-implant health. Additionally, Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) was assessed by means of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Twenty-six patients received two non-splinted implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible by means of locators. One implant was installed equicrestally (control) and the second one was installed subcrestally, taking at least 3 mm soft tissue thickness into account (test). During initial bone remodeling (up to 6 months postoperatively), equicrestal placement yielded 0.68 mm additional surface exposure compared to subcrestal placement (

Keywords: bone loss; dental implant; implant survival; oral health-related quality of life; overdenture; patient-reported outcome measures; peri-implantitis; soft tissue; split-mouth design

References

  1. J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Oct;23(10):971-3 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):605-612 - PubMed
  3. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):712-9 - PubMed
  4. J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):3-9 - PubMed
  5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):214-218 - PubMed
  6. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Apr 6;: - PubMed
  7. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 May;21(5):466-72 - PubMed
  8. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):7-21 - PubMed
  9. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):319-324 - PubMed
  10. J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jan;62(1):1-9 - PubMed
  11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):365-72 - PubMed
  12. Gerodontology. 2019 Sep;36(3):195-204 - PubMed
  13. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23(2):197-204 - PubMed
  14. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:152-156 - PubMed
  15. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:100-123 - PubMed
  16. J Dent Res. 2016 Apr;95(4):372-9 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5 Suppl:S13-9 - PubMed
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):e168-e178 - PubMed
  19. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S313-S318 - PubMed
  20. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):886-894 - PubMed
  21. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):238-47 - PubMed
  22. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90 - PubMed
  23. J Periodontol. 2014 Jan;85(1):68-82 - PubMed
  24. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Jun;7(2):133-42 - PubMed
  25. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):30-9 - PubMed
  26. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):321-32 - PubMed
  27. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 May;79(5):575-9 - PubMed
  28. Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 05;12(1): - PubMed
  29. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):515-521 - PubMed
  30. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e364-75 - PubMed
  31. J Periodontol. 2016 Jun;87(6):690-9 - PubMed
  32. Gerodontology. 2002 Jul;19(1):3-4 - PubMed
  33. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):123-9 - PubMed
  34. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):e28-e34 - PubMed
  35. Stat Med. 2009 Dec 10;28(28):3470-82 - PubMed
  36. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):835-844 - PubMed

Publication Types