Display options
Share it on

Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 01;14:560176. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.560176. eCollection 2020.

Exploring the Benefits of Doll Play Through Neuroscience.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Salim Hashmi, Ross E Vanderwert, Hope A Price, Sarah A Gerson

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  2. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  3. School of Psychology, Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science (CUCHDS), Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  4. School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff, United Kingdom.

PMID: 33132876 PMCID: PMC7560494 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.560176

Abstract

It has long been hypothesized that pretend play is beneficial to social and cognitive development. However, there is little evidence regarding the neural regions that are active while children engage in pretend play. We examined the activation of prefrontal and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) regions using near-infrared spectroscopy while 42 4- to 8-year-old children freely played with dolls or tablet games with a social partner or by themselves. Social play activated right prefrontal regions more than solo play. Children engaged the pSTS during solo doll play but not during solo tablet play, suggesting they were rehearsing social cognitive skills more with dolls. These findings suggest social play utilizes multiple neural regions and highlight how doll play can achieve similar patterns of activation, even when children play by themselves. Doll play may provide a unique opportunity for children to practice social interactions important for developing social-emotional skills, such as empathy.

Copyright © 2020 Hashmi, Vanderwert, Price and Gerson.

Keywords: development; empathy; fNIRS (functional near infrared spectroscopy); play; social processing

References

  1. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Oct;23(9-10):755-767 - PubMed
  2. Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(3):501-507 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 May;145:120-38 - PubMed
  4. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Feb;19(2):284-92 - PubMed
  5. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 13;6:233 - PubMed
  6. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jan 11;12:505 - PubMed
  7. Neurophotonics. 2014 Oct;1(2):025006 - PubMed
  8. Child Dev. 1995 Oct;66(5):1472-92 - PubMed
  9. J Biomed Opt. 2014 Jun;19(6):067010 - PubMed
  10. Neurosci Res. 2013 May-Jun;76(1-2):76-82 - PubMed
  11. Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1639-47 - PubMed
  12. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4596-609 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):1-34 - PubMed
  14. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;21(11):826-834 - PubMed
  15. Cogn Dev. 2014 Jan;29: - PubMed
  16. Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 20;6:922 - PubMed
  17. Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Feb 15;55(4):359-66 - PubMed
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):6017-21 - PubMed
  19. Neurophotonics. 2018 Jan;5(1):011020 - PubMed
  20. ISRN Neurosci. 2014 Mar 09;2014:734952 - PubMed
  21. Bull Menninger Clin. 2016 Winter;80(1):60-79 - PubMed
  22. Child Dev. 2009 Jul-Aug;80(4):986-99 - PubMed
  23. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Aug;199(3):457-80 - PubMed
  24. Pediatr Res. 2020 Mar 13;: - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 16;105(37):14222-7 - PubMed
  26. Cortex. 2015 Sep;70:35-48 - PubMed

Publication Types