Cite
Garcia FH, Andreoiu C, Ball GC, et al. Absence of Low-Energy Shape Coexistence in ^{80}Ge: The Nonobservation of a Proposed Excited 0_{2}^{+} Level at 639 keV. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;125(17):172501doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.172501.
Garcia, F. H., Andreoiu, C., Ball, G. C., Bell, A., Garnsworthy, A. B., Nowacki, F., Petrache, C. M., Poves, A., Whitmore, K., Ali, F. A., Bernier, N., Bhattacharjee, S. S., Bowry, M., Coleman, R. J., Dillmann, I., Djianto, I., Forney, A. M., Gascoine, M., Hackman, G., Leach, K. G., Murphy, A. N., Natzke, C. R., Olaizola, B., Ortner, K., Peters, E. E., Rajabali, M. M., Raymond, K., Svensson, C. E., Umashankar, R., Williams, J., & Yates, D. (2020). Absence of Low-Energy Shape Coexistence in ^{80}Ge: The Nonobservation of a Proposed Excited 0_{2}^{+} Level at 639 keV. Physical review letters, 125(17), 172501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.172501
Garcia, F H, et al. "Absence of Low-Energy Shape Coexistence in ^{80}Ge: The Nonobservation of a Proposed Excited 0_{2}^{+} Level at 639 keV." Physical review letters vol. 125,17 (2020): 172501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.172501
Garcia FH, Andreoiu C, Ball GC, Bell A, Garnsworthy AB, Nowacki F, Petrache CM, Poves A, Whitmore K, Ali FA, Bernier N, Bhattacharjee SS, Bowry M, Coleman RJ, Dillmann I, Djianto I, Forney AM, Gascoine M, Hackman G, Leach KG, Murphy AN, Natzke CR, Olaizola B, Ortner K, Peters EE, Rajabali MM, Raymond K, Svensson CE, Umashankar R, Williams J, Yates D. Absence of Low-Energy Shape Coexistence in ^{80}Ge: The Nonobservation of a Proposed Excited 0_{2}^{+} Level at 639 keV. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Oct 23;125(17):172501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.172501. PMID: 33156683.
Copy
Download .nbib