Display options
Share it on

SICOT J. 2020;6:44. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020042. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of the Constant Murley Score into Arabic.

SICOT-J

Ali Maqdes, Sager Samir Hanna, Ahmed Khaled Bouhamra, Aliaa F Khaja

Affiliations

  1. Al Razi Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait.
  2. Al Razi Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait - Upper Extremity Fellowship, Queens University, Canada.

PMID: 33220719 PMCID: PMC7680506 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2020042

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Shoulder pain is a major disorder of the musculoskeletal system. To the best of our knowledge, there is no documentation of an Arabic version of the shoulder disability and pain measurements. Constant Murley Score (CMS) is one of the standard questionnaires for clinical practice and research. The aim of this research centred around the evaluation of the Arabic Constant Murley Score and subsequently assessing the reliability and validity in comparison to disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH).

METHODS: Hundred and twenty five patients took part in this research. We did the internal consistency tests with Cronbach's alpha. Intra-correlation coefficient, convergent validity, convergent construct validity, responsiveness, and floor and ceiling effects were also calculated.

RESULTS: Principal component analysis showed that the variance was 63.31% with a factor range of 0.42-0.85, which fulfils the uni-dimensionality criterion. Also, the Arabic CMS correlated negatively with the DASH score (-0.82, p < 0.001). The Arabic version of CMS was consistent with Cronbach's alpha of 0.74. With Inter Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.83 it also showed a very good test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSION: Ours is the first translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CMS into Arabic. Important evidences of validity were tested such as uni-dimensionality, convergent validity, and internal consistency. Results demonstrate an acceptable Cronbach's alpha of 0.74, ICC = 0.830 indicating excellent reliability and a strong correlation of the Arabic CMS with the DASH score (r = -0.820). Overall, the Arabic version of CMS is a good and reliable diagnostic tool for patients experiencing shoulder pain.

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020.

Keywords: Arabic language; Constant score; Outcome assessment; Questionnaire; Translation; Validity

References

  1. Dan Med J. 2013 Apr;60(4):A4608 - PubMed
  2. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun;16(3):285-9 - PubMed
  3. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 - PubMed
  4. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 May-Jun;14(3):273-8 - PubMed
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32 - PubMed
  6. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 May;44(5):336-40 - PubMed
  7. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(25):2469-78 - PubMed
  8. Qual Life Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2217-2226 - PubMed
  9. Arthroscopy. 2008 Jun;24(6):712-7 - PubMed
  10. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):157-64 - PubMed
  11. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Mar;51(3):366-71 - PubMed
  12. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Nov;57(11):649-55 - PubMed
  13. SICOT J. 2019;5:6 - PubMed
  14. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104 - PubMed
  15. JSES Open Access. 2017 Apr 19;1(1):45-50 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41 - PubMed
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 1;36(7):581-8 - PubMed
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1565-71 - PubMed
  19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):355-61 - PubMed
  20. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4 - PubMed
  21. Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2509-47 - PubMed
  22. Unfallchirurg. 2004 May;107(5):397-402 - PubMed
  23. SICOT J. 2019 Jan;5:7 - PubMed
  24. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):69-75 - PubMed
  25. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jan;44(378):25-9 - PubMed
  26. Qual Life Res. 1994 Dec;3(6):403-12 - PubMed
  27. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jan;21(1):4-12 - PubMed

Publication Types