Display options
Share it on

Genes Brain Behav. 2021 Apr;20(4):e12718. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12718. Epub 2020 Dec 09.

Correlation between octopaminergic signalling and foraging task specialisation in honeybees.

Genes, brain, and behavior

Andrés Arenas, Rocío Lajad, Tianfei Peng, Christoph Grüter, Walter Farina

Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Insectos Sociales, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  2. Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias, CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  3. Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolutionary Biology, Johannes-Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  4. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

PMID: 33251675 DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12718

Abstract

Regulation of pollen and nectar foraging in honeybees is linked to differences in the sensitivity to the reward. Octopamine (OA) participates in the processing of reward-related information in the bee brain, being a candidate to mediate and modulate the division of labour among pollen and nectar foragers. Here we tested the hypothesis that OA affects the resource preferences of foragers. We first investigated whether oral administration of OA is involved in the transition from nectar to pollen foraging. We quantified the percentage of OA-treated bees that switched from a sucrose solution to a pollen feeder when the sugar concentration was decreased experimentally. We also evaluated if feeding the colonies sucrose solution containing OA increases the rate of bees collecting pollen. Finally, we quantified OA and tyramine (TYR) receptor genes expression of pollen and nectar foragers in different parts of the brain, as a putative mechanism that affects the decision-making process regarding the resource type collected. Adding OA in the food modified the probability that foragers switch from nectar to pollen collection. The proportion of pollen foragers also increased after feeding colonies with OA-containing food. Furthermore, the expression level of the AmoctαR1 was upregulated in foragers arriving at pollen sources compared with those arriving at sugar-water feeders. Using age-matched pollen and nectar foragers that returned to the hive, we detected an upregulated expression of a TYR receptor gene in the suboesophageal ganglia. These findings support our prediction that OA signalling affects the decision in honeybee foragers to collect pollen or nectar.

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Keywords: brain; division of labour; honeybee; octopamine; pollen foragers; receptor gene expression; subesophageal ganglion; task specialisation; task switching; tyramine

References

  1. Oster GF, Wilson EO. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press; 1978. - PubMed
  2. Wilson EO. Between-caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the ant Pheidole pubiventris (hymenoptera: formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1985;17:35-37. - PubMed
  3. Jeanne RL. The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monit Zool Ital. 1986;20(1):19-33. - PubMed
  4. Robinson GE. Hormonal regulation of age polyethism in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Neurobiology and Behavior of Honeybees. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1987:266-279. - PubMed
  5. Robinson GE. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37(1):637-665. - PubMed
  6. Winston ML. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987. - PubMed
  7. Blenau W, Baumann A. Octopaminergic and tyraminergic signaling in the honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain: behavioral, pharmacological, and molecular aspects. Trace amines and neurological disorders. Farooqui A, Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors. Oxford: Academic Press; 2016;203-219. - PubMed
  8. Scheiner R, Entler BV, Barron AB, Scholl C, Thamm M. The effects of fat body tyramine level on gustatory responsiveness of honeybees (Apis mellifera) differ between behavioral castes. Front Syst Neurosci. 2017;11:55. - PubMed
  9. Scheiner R, Reim T, Søvik E, Entler BV, Barron AB, Thamm M. Learning, gustatory responsiveness and tyramine differences across nurse and forager honeybees. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(8):1443-1450. - PubMed
  10. Wagener-Hulme C, Kuehn JC, Schulz DJ, Robinson GE. Biogenic amines and division of labor in honey bee colonies. J Comp Physiol A. 1999;184(5):471-479. - PubMed
  11. Schulz DJ, Elekonich MM, Robinson GE. Biogenic amines in the antennal lobes and the initiation and maintenance of foraging behavior in honey bees. J Neurobiol. 2003;54(2):406-416. - PubMed
  12. Schulz DJ, Robinson GE. Biogenic amines and division of labor in honey bee colonies: behaviorally related changes in the antennal lobes and age-related changes in the mushroom bodies. J Comp Physiol A. 1999;184(5):481-488. - PubMed
  13. McQuillan HJ, Barron AB, Mercer AR. Age-and behaviour-related changes in the expression of biogenic amine receptor genes in the antennae of honey bees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Physiol A. 2012;198(10):753-761. - PubMed
  14. Reim T, Scheiner R. Division of labour in honey bees: age-and task-related changes in the expression of octopamine receptor genes. Insect Mol Biol. 2014;23(6):833-841. - PubMed
  15. Bicker G, Menzel R. Chemical codes for the control of behaviour in arthropods. Nature. 1989;337(6202):33-39. - PubMed
  16. Roeder T. Biogenic amines and their receptors in insects. Comp Biochem Phys C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1994;107(1):1-12. - PubMed
  17. Scheiner R, Baumann A, Blenau W. Aminergic control and modulation of honeybee behaviour. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2006;4(4):259-276. - PubMed
  18. Blenau W, Baumann A. Aminergic signal transduction in invertebrates: focus on tyramine and octopamine receptors. Recent Res Dev Neurochem. 2003;6:225-240. - PubMed
  19. Blenau W, Baumann A. Molecular and pharmacological properties of insect biogenic amine receptors: lessons from Drosophila melanogaster and Apis mellifera arch. Insect Biochem Physiol. 2000;48:13-38. - PubMed
  20. Scheiner R, Plückhahn S, Öney B, Blenau W, Erber J. Behavioural pharmacology of octopamine, tyramine and dopamine in honey bees. Behav Brain Res. 2002;136(2):545-553. - PubMed
  21. Mercer AR, Menzel R. The effects of biogenic amines on conditioned and unconditioned responses to olfactory stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A. 1982;145:363-368. - PubMed
  22. Hildebrandt H, Müller U. Octopamine mediates rapid stimulation of protein kinase a in the antennal lobe of honeybees. J Neurobiol. 1995;27:44-50. - PubMed
  23. Barron A, Schulz D, Robinson G. Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera). J Comp Physiol A. 2002;188(8):603-610. - PubMed
  24. Spivak M, Masterman R, Ross R, Mesce KA. Hygienic behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and the modulatory role of octopamine. J Neurobiol. 2003;55:341-354. - PubMed
  25. Schulz DJ, Robinson GE. Octopamine influences division of labor in honey bee colonies. J Comp Physiol A. 2001;187(1):53-61. - PubMed
  26. Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK, Nasr M. Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiology. 1995;36:387-396. - PubMed
  27. Page RE Jr, Erber J, Fondrk MK. The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A. 1998;182(4):489-500. - PubMed
  28. Waddington KD, Nelson CM, Page RE. Effects of pollen quality and genotype on the dance of foraging honey bees. Anim Behav. 1998;56(1):35-39. - PubMed
  29. Pankiw T, Page RE Jr. Response thresholds to sucrose predict foraging behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;47:265-267. - PubMed
  30. Arenas A, Kohlmaier MG. Nectar source profitability influences individual foraging preferences for pollen and pollen-foraging activity of honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73(3):34. - PubMed
  31. Hauser F, Cazzamali G, Williamson M, Blenau W, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP. A review of neurohormone GPCRs present in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster and the honey bee Apis mellifera. Prog Neurobiol. 2006;80:1-19. - PubMed
  32. Balfanz S, Jordan N, Langenstück T, Breuer J, Bergmeier V, Baumann A. Molecular, pharmacological, and signaling properties of octopamine receptors from honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain. J Neurochem. 2014;129:284-296. - PubMed
  33. Sinakevitch I, Mustard JA, Smith BH. Distribution of the octopamine receptor AmOA1 in the honey bee brain. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14536. - PubMed
  34. Cazzamali G, Klaerke DA, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP. A new family of insect tyramine receptors. Biochemic Biophys Res Comm. 2005;338:1189-1196. - PubMed
  35. Reim T, Balfanz S, Baumann A, Blenau W, Thamm M, Scheiner R. AmTAR2: functional characterization of a honeybee tyramine receptor stimulating adenylyl cyclase activity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;80:91-100. - PubMed
  36. Beggs KT, Tyndall JD, Mercer AR. Honey bee dopamine and octopamine receptors linked to intracellular calcium signaling have a close phylogenetic and pharmacological relationship. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26809. - PubMed
  37. Blenau W, Balfanz S, Baumann A. Amtyr1: characterization of a gene from honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain encoding a functional tyramine receptor. J Neurochem. 2000;74:900-908. - PubMed
  38. Mustard JA, Kurshan PT, Hamilton IS, Blenau W, Mercer AR. Developmental expression of a tyramine receptor gene in the brain of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol. 2005;483:66-75. - PubMed
  39. Giray T, Galindo-Cardona A, Oskay D. Octopamine influences honey bee foraging preference. J Insect Physiol. 2007;53(7):691-698. - PubMed
  40. Schulz DJ, Pankiw T, Fondrk MK, Robinson GE, Page RE. Comparisons of juvenile hormone hemolymph and octopamine brain titers in honey bees (hymenoptera: apidae) selected for high and low pollen hoarding. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2004;97(6):1313-1319. - PubMed
  41. Page RE, Fondrk MK. The effects of colony-level selection on the social organization of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies: colony-level components of pollen hoarding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1995;36(2):135-144. - PubMed
  42. Scheiner R, Toteva A, Reim T, Søvik E, Barron AB. Differences in the phototaxis of pollen and nectar foraging honey bees are related to their octopamine brain titers. Front Physiol. 2014;5:116. - PubMed
  43. Scheiner R, Kulikovskaja L, Thamm M. The honey bee tyramine receptor AmTYR1 and division of foraging labour. J Exp Biol. 2014;217(8):1215-1217. - PubMed
  44. Rotjan R, Calderone N, Seeley T. How a honey bee colony mustered additional labor for the task of pollen foraging. Apidologie. 2002;33(4):367-373. - PubMed
  45. Amdam GV, Csondes A, Fondrk MK, Page RE. Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits. Nature. 2006;439(7072):76-78. - PubMed
  46. Seeley TD. The Wisdom of the Hive: the Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995. - PubMed
  47. Erber J, Kloppenburg P, Scheidler A. Neuromodulation by serotonin and octopamine in the honeybee: behaviour, neuroanatomy and electrophysiology. Experientia. 1993;49:1073-1083. - PubMed
  48. Perry CJ, Barron AB. Neural mechanisms of reward in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013;58:543-562. - PubMed
  49. Galizia CG, Eisenhardt D, Giurfa M. Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior: a Tribute to Randolf Menzel. Berlín: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. - PubMed
  50. Arenas A, Farina WM. Age and rearing environment interact in the retention of early olfactory memories in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A. 2008;194(7):629-640. - PubMed
  51. Grozinger CM, Sharabash NM, Whitfield CW, Robinson GE. Pheromone-mediated gene expression in the honey bee brain. PNAS. 2003;100(2):14519-14525. - PubMed
  52. Reim T, Thamm M, Rolke D, Blenau W, Scheiner R. Suitability of three common reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in honey bees. Apidologie. 2013;44(3):342-350. - PubMed
  53. Liang ZS, Nguyen T, Mattila HR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Seeley TD, Robinson GE. Molecular determinants of scouting behavior in honey bees. Science. 2012;335(6073):1225-1228. - PubMed
  54. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C T method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-1108. - PubMed
  55. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Chapman, Hall, Generalized linear models. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1989;37. - PubMed
  56. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:127-135. - PubMed
  57. Crawley MJ. The R Book. West Sussex: Wiley; 2007. - PubMed
  58. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. GLM and GAM for count data. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York, NY: Springer; 2009:209-243. - PubMed
  59. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. lme4: linear mixed effects model using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. 2011. - PubMed
  60. R Development Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. - PubMed
  61. Scheiner R, Page RE, Erber J. Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie. 2004;35(2):133-142. - PubMed
  62. Arenas A, Farina WM. Honeybee pollen collecting: learned floral cues affect foraging preferences. Anim Behav. 2012;83:1023-1033. - PubMed
  63. Pernal SF, Currie RW. Discrimination and preferences for pollen based cues by foraging honeybees, Apis mellifera L. Anim Behav. 2002;63:369-390. - PubMed
  64. Arenas A, Farina WM. Bias to pollen odors is affected by early exposure and foraging experience. J Insect Physiol. 2014;66:28-36. - PubMed
  65. Nery D, Moreno Coellar EA, Arenas A. Pollen reinforces learning in honey bee pollen foragers but not in nectar foragers. J Exp Biol. 2020;223:230250. - PubMed
  66. Pankiw T, Nelson M, Page RE, Fondrk MK. The communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2004;55(3):286-292. - PubMed
  67. Ramírez GP, Martínez AS, Fernández VM, Bielsa GC, Farina WM. The influence of gustatory and olfactory experiences on responsiveness to reward in the honeybee. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13498. - PubMed
  68. Fewell JH, Winston ML. Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1992;30(6):387-393. - PubMed
  69. Fewell JH, Page RE. Genotypic variation in foraging responses to environmental stimuli by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1993;49:1106-1112. - PubMed
  70. Taylor DJ, Robinson GE, Logan BJ, Laverty R, Mercer AR. Changes in brain amine levels associated with the morphological and behavioral development of the worker honeybee. J Comp Physiol A. 1992;170:715-721. - PubMed
  71. Verlinden H, Vleugels R, Marchal E, et al. The role of octopamine in locusts and other arthropods. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56(8):854-867. - PubMed
  72. Jernigan CM, Halby R, Gerkin RC, Sinakevitch I, Locatelli F, Smith BH. Experience-dependent tuning of early olfactory processing in the adult honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Exp Biol. 2020;223(1):1-13. - PubMed
  73. Kreissl S, Eichmüller S, Bicker G, Rapus J, Eckert M. Octopamine-like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. J Comp Neurol. 1994;348(4):583-595. - PubMed

Publication Types