Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:555265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265. eCollection 2020.

Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review.

Frontiers in psychology

Holger Diessel, Kenny R Coventry

Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany.
  2. School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

PMID: 33324275 PMCID: PMC7723831 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555265

Abstract

This paper offers a review of research on demonstratives from an interdisciplinary perspective. In particular, we consider the role of demonstratives in current research on language universals, language evolution, language acquisition, multimodal communication, signed language, language and perception, language in interaction, spatial imagery, and discourse processing. Traditionally, demonstratives are analyzed as a particular class of spatial deictics. Yet, a number of recent studies have argued that space is largely irrelevant to deixis and that demonstratives are primarily used for social and interactive purposes. Synthesizing findings in the literature, we conclude that demonstratives are a very special class of linguistic items that are foundational to both spatial and social aspects of language and cognition.

Copyright © 2020 Diessel and Coventry.

Keywords: deixis; demonstrative; embodied cognition; joint attention; language acquisition; language universals; peripersonal action space; spatial cognition

References

  1. Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:64-84 - PubMed
  2. Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;43(3):e12719 - PubMed
  3. Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):889-95 - PubMed
  4. J Child Lang. 2006 May;33(2):303-20 - PubMed
  5. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210333 - PubMed
  6. Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 1;216:116128 - PubMed
  7. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:222 - PubMed
  8. Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 18;9(1):14967 - PubMed
  9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Dec;22(12):1076-1090 - PubMed
  10. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735 - PubMed
  11. Cognition. 2016 Aug;153:99-107 - PubMed
  12. Cognition. 1999 Nov 9;73(1):35-63 - PubMed
  13. Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104070 - PubMed
  14. Cognition. 2019 Oct;191:103989 - PubMed
  15. Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):124-9 - PubMed
  16. Cogn Sci. 2012 May-Jun;36(4):698-713 - PubMed
  17. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Mar;69:46-70 - PubMed
  18. Cognition. 2000 Apr 14;75(1):1-28 - PubMed
  19. J Semant. 2008;25(1):1-44 - PubMed
  20. Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):415-9 - PubMed
  21. Trends Neurosci. 1992 Jan;15(1):20-5 - PubMed
  22. Cognition. 2009 May;111(2):270-4 - PubMed
  23. Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Oct;32(5):429-48; discussion 448-494 - PubMed

Publication Types