Eur J Dent. 2021 May;15(2):266-272. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721294. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
Evaluation of Panoramic Radiographs in Relation to the Mandibular Third Molar and to Incidental Findings in an Adult Population.
European journal of dentistry
Josefine Cederhag, Nina Lundegren, Per Alstergren, Xie-Qi Shi, Kristina Hellén-Halme
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
- Department of Oral Diagnostics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
- Department of Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
- Specialized Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
- Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
PMID: 33368065
PMCID: PMC8184276 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721294
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the characteristics of the mandibular third molars, especially in relation to the inferior alveolar nerve. Further aims were to investigate incidental findings in panoramic radiographs in an adult population, and to investigate image quality related to patient positioning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a previous study with 451 randomly selected adult participants who lived in Sweden, 442 panoramic radiographs from four dental public health clinics were used. The third molars' characteristics and relation to inferior alveolar nerve were evaluated. Incidental findings and patient positioning were recorded.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Frequency analysis was used to investigate the occurrence of all findings and their possible interconnections. Whether the patients' age or gender had an impact or not was also analyzed.
RESULTS: The third molars were erupted in vertical position among 73% regardless of age. When retained or semi-retained, they were most commonly in mesioangular positions. The inferior alveolar nerve was located inferior to the roots in 52%, whereas an overlapped position was most common if the third molar was retained (90%), semi-retained (83%) or the age was less than 30 years (66%). Common incidental findings were apical radiolucencies, idiopathic osteosclerosis, and tooth fragments. Suboptimal patient positioning was found in one-third of the radiographs.
CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic radiography is a useful method to evaluate third molar prior to surgical removal and may be the only image required. Most incidental findings on panoramic radiographs does not seem to require any further odontological management.
European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
- Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):1-6 - PubMed
- J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Oct;78(10):617-22 - PubMed
- J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;66(10):2130-5 - PubMed
- Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Sep;37(6):340-3 - PubMed
- Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):98-102 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):320-6 - PubMed
- BMC Oral Health. 2018 Apr 4;18(1):58 - PubMed
- Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;32(5):548-52 - PubMed
- Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(6):20140001 - PubMed
- Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 Dec;70(6):511-9 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Oct;18(5):277-80 - PubMed
- Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;42(1):21-7 - PubMed
- J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):74-82 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):150-5 - PubMed
- Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):8-12 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Apr;115(4):550-7 - PubMed
- J Dent. 1996 May;24(3):185-201 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Dec;76(6):699-703 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;(7):CD004345 - PubMed
- Swed Dent J. 2014;38(4):179-85 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jul;82(1):10-7 - PubMed
- Swed Dent J. 2014;38(1):31-8 - PubMed
- Br Dent J. 1999 Jun 26;186(12):630-3 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Nov;100(5):545-9 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Jan;95(1):119-25 - PubMed
- Imaging Sci Dent. 2012 Dec;42(4):207-12 - PubMed
- Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Mar;50(1):53-64 - PubMed
- Acta Odontol Scand. 2011 Nov;69(6):355-9 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1015-1022 - PubMed
- Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Apr;83(4):517-21 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 May;46(5):628-635 - PubMed
- Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Oct;37(7):380-4 - PubMed
- Swed Dent J Suppl. 1991;78:1-129 - PubMed
Publication Types