Display options
Share it on

Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 17;14:611130. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.611130. eCollection 2020.

Beyond Technologies of Electroencephalography-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Systematic Review From Commercial and Ethical Aspects.

Frontiers in neuroscience

Cesar Augusto Fontanillo Lopez, Guangye Li, Dingguo Zhang

Affiliations

  1. KU-Leuven Center for IT & IP Law, KU-Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  2. The Robotics Institute, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  3. The Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

PMID: 33390892 PMCID: PMC7773904 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.611130

Abstract

The deployment of electroencephalographic techniques for commercial applications has undergone a rapid growth in recent decades. As they continue to expand in the consumer markets as suitable techniques for monitoring the brain activity, their transformative potential necessitates equally significant ethical inquiries. One of the main questions, which arises then when evaluating these kinds of applications, is whether they should be aligned or not with the main ethical concerns reported by scholars and experts. Thus, the present work attempts to unify these disciplines of knowledge by performing a comprehensive scan of the major electroencephalographic market applications as well as their most relevant ethical concerns arising from the existing literature. In this literature review, different databases were consulted, which presented conceptual and empirical discussions and findings about commercial and ethical aspects of electroencephalography. Subsequently, the content was extracted from the articles and the main conclusions were presented. Finally, an external assessment of the outcomes was conducted in consultation with an expert panel in some of the topic areas such as biomedical engineering, biomechatronics, and neuroscience. The ultimate purpose of this review is to provide a genuine insight into the cutting-edge practical attempts at electroencephalography. By the same token, it seeks to highlight the overlap between the market needs and the ethical standards that should govern the deployment of electroencephalographic consumer-grade solutions, providing a practical approach that overcomes the engineering myopia of certain ethical discussions.

Copyright © 2020 Fontanillo Lopez, Li and Zhang.

Keywords: EEG; brain-computer interface; commercial aspects; electroencephalography; ethical aspects

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neuroethics. 2013;6:513-526 - PubMed
  2. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976 May;40(5):529-34 - PubMed
  3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48 - PubMed
  4. Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1061-71 - PubMed
  5. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):470-7 - PubMed
  6. Brain Topogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):46-54 - PubMed
  7. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1271-84 - PubMed
  8. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2014 Oct;52(10):861-72 - PubMed
  9. Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Mar 22;18:923-931 - PubMed
  10. Am J Bioeth. 2009 May;9(5):45-7 - PubMed
  11. Neural Netw. 2009 Nov;22(9):1352-7 - PubMed
  12. JAMA. 1984 Aug 17;252(7):925-7 - PubMed
  13. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Aug 09;13(8):10273-86 - PubMed
  14. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):230-7 - PubMed
  15. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 26;10:539 - PubMed
  16. Brain Topogr. 2018 Sep;31(5):848-862 - PubMed
  17. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):617-627 - PubMed
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):E6058-67 - PubMed
  19. Front Neuroeng. 2012 Jul 17;5:14 - PubMed
  20. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 24;18(2): - PubMed
  21. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016 Oct;54(10):1503-13 - PubMed
  22. Physiol Meas. 2018 Aug 29;39(8):08TR02 - PubMed
  23. Neurology. 2006 Jun 27;66(12):1811-6 - PubMed
  24. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):59-63 - PubMed
  25. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;10:250-263 - PubMed
  26. Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 07;6:36487 - PubMed
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr;12(4):163-9 - PubMed
  28. Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):379-87 - PubMed
  29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Apr;128(4):512-519 - PubMed
  30. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jan;9(1):41-7 - PubMed
  31. Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Nov-Dec;45(6):26-35 - PubMed
  32. Funct Neurol. 2011 Jan-Mar;26(1):51-4 - PubMed
  33. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018 May 22;2018:1867548 - PubMed
  34. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:3925-8 - PubMed
  35. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2015;19:205-22 - PubMed
  36. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(11):1847-51 - PubMed
  37. J Neural Eng. 2013 Aug;10(4):046003 - PubMed
  38. AJOB Neurosci. 2015 Oct 2;6(4):4-11 - PubMed
  39. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Apr;16(4):213-25 - PubMed
  40. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012 Mar;7(2):89-103 - PubMed
  41. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 26;10:416 - PubMed
  42. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0193607 - PubMed
  43. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jun-Jul;53-54:73-85 - PubMed
  44. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011 Oct;42(4):219-24 - PubMed
  45. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul;122(7):1333-41 - PubMed
  46. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;11:51 - PubMed
  47. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;58(1):35-38 - PubMed
  48. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995 Sep;20(3):211-28 - PubMed
  49. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69 - PubMed
  50. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006 Jun;14(2):205-10 - PubMed
  51. Assist Technol. 2013 Summer;25(2):99-110 - PubMed
  52. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:889 - PubMed
  53. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;36(2):94-9 - PubMed
  54. J Med Eng Technol. 2017 Nov;41(8):670-680 - PubMed
  55. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;115(7):1490-505 - PubMed
  56. Food Res Int. 2018 Jun;108:650-664 - PubMed
  57. Brain Sci. 2018 Mar 30;8(4): - PubMed
  58. J Physiol. 2007 Mar 15;579(Pt 3):621-36 - PubMed
  59. J Addict Dis. 1996;15(4):39-53 - PubMed
  60. Front Neurosci. 2018 Jun 29;12:423 - PubMed
  61. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191500 - PubMed
  62. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Oct;57:401-10 - PubMed
  63. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 01;12:107 - PubMed
  64. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jul 31;11:388 - PubMed
  65. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011 Oct;42(4):236-44 - PubMed
  66. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:15-23 - PubMed
  67. Biotechnol J. 2008 Dec;3(12):1493-501 - PubMed
  68. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Nov;52(Pt A):1-7 - PubMed
  69. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:5549-52 - PubMed
  70. J Neural Eng. 2011 Apr;8(2):025005 - PubMed
  71. J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):191-205 - PubMed
  72. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun;129(6):1130-1136 - PubMed
  73. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016 Apr;7(2):143-58 - PubMed
  74. J Mot Behav. 2015;47(1):73-8 - PubMed
  75. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:11-18 - PubMed
  76. Front Neurosci. 2016 Nov 21;10:530 - PubMed
  77. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26322 - PubMed
  78. J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):289-92 - PubMed
  79. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:57-60 - PubMed
  80. Biomed Mater Eng. 2018;29(5):551-566 - PubMed
  81. Am J Psychiatry. 1978 Jan;135(1):69-74 - PubMed
  82. AJOB Neurosci. 2014 Jan;5(1):24-33 - PubMed
  83. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010 Oct;11(5):449-55 - PubMed
  84. Neuron. 2013 Dec 4;80(5):1112-28 - PubMed
  85. Speech Commun. 2010 Apr 1;52(4):367-379 - PubMed
  86. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Summer;16(3):291-302 - PubMed
  87. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2006;(70):409-14 - PubMed
  88. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jun;129(6):1209-1220 - PubMed
  89. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;7:31-49 - PubMed
  90. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Sep;89(3):334-41 - PubMed
  91. N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 22;319(25):1635-8 - PubMed
  92. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):60 - PubMed
  93. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2011 Jan;15(1):19-25 - PubMed
  94. Brain Topogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):4-11 - PubMed
  95. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6104-9 - PubMed

Publication Types