Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020 Sep 11;54(3):371-374. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.61482. eCollection 2020.

Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Findings in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy.

Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni

Fatma Cetinkaya Cat, Mehmet Sait Okan

PMID: 33312038 PMCID: PMC7729725 DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.61482

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy is characterized as a tendency towards recurrent seizures and it is a significant health problem in the world and one of the most common severe neurologic disorders among children. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the etiology in patients with refractory epilepsy and to reveal pathologies that may have the potential to be treated with methods, such as epileptic surgery.

METHODS: Data were obtained from the patient files of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy and monitored for at least two years between 01.01.2009-12.31.2012 in the Uludag Faculty of Medicine, the Division of the Pediatric Neurology. File records of the patients, age, sex and MRI findings of the patients were recorded.

RESULTS: One hundred twenty were girls (49%) and 125 were male (51%) of the cases. The age range ranged from 1 to 18 years and the median value was 8.3 (1-18) years. One hundred twenty of the 245 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for resistant epilepsy was found as well controlled. In patients with resistant epilepsy, the findings of these two groups of patients were compared concerning MR findings. Among all patients, 154 (62.8%) patients were found to have MR pathology. Of these patients, 83 (53.9%) were in the resistant group and 71 (46.1%) were in the well-controlled group. There was no significant difference in the presence of MR findings between the two groups (p=0.354). The highest incidence (24.8%) of the encephalomalacia in patients in the resistant group may explain the association of perinatal hypoxia with resistance development.

CONCLUSION: If patients with epilepsy can be predicted early in the disease, which group of the patients will not respond well to medical treatment; unlike other patients, different treatment modalities, such as antiepileptic use, vagal nerve stimulation, ketogenic diet and epilepsy surgery, can be applied to this group of the patients. We think that clinicians can guide the planning of treatment of the MR findings.

Copyright: © 2019 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital.

Keywords: Child; epilepsy; magnetic resonance; resistant epilepsy

Conflict of interest statement

References

1. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Sep;61(3):343-7 - PubMed
2. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jul;110(7):1245-51 - PubMed
3. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999 Jun;99(6):329-33 - PubMed
4. Epilepsia. 1996 Jan;37(1):24-30 - PubMed
5. Epilepsy Curr. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):177-80 - PubMed
6. Semin Neurol. 1990 Dec;10(4):406-13 - PubMed
7. Epilepsia. 1990 Nov-Dec;31(6):806-12 - PubMed
8. Lancet. 1976 May 1;1(7966):948-51 - PubMed
9. Neurology. 2001 Jun 12;56(11):1445-52 - PubMed
10. Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:401323 - PubMed
11. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:609813 - PubMed
12. Pediatr Neurol. 2002 Sep;27(3):186-91 - PubMed
13. Dev Neurosci. 2001;23(3):198-202 - PubMed
14. Lancet. 1983 Oct 22;2(8356):952-4 - PubMed
15. Epilepsy Res. 2009 Jul;85(1):31-45 - PubMed
16. EPMA J. 2011 Jun;2(2):197-210 - PubMed
17. Neurology. 2003 Jan 28;60(2):162-3 - PubMed
18. Epilepsia. 2006 Feb;47(2):431-6 - PubMed
19. Epilepsia. 1997 Dec;38(12):1275-82 - PubMed
20. Metabolism. 2000 Feb;49(2 Suppl 1):3-8 - PubMed
21. Pediatr Neurol. 2001 Mar;24(3):209-13 - PubMed
22. Adv Neurol. 2006;97:5-10 - PubMed
23. Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Sep;7(2):204-13 - PubMed
24. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1995 Jul;6(3):419-29 - PubMed
25. Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Oct;81(10):1063-72 - PubMed
26. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):314-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article