Display options
Share it on

Pharmaceutics. 2020 Dec 26;13(1). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010029.

The Positive and Negative Outcome of Morphine and Disulfiram Subacute Co-Administration in Rats in the Absence of Ethanol Challenge.

Pharmaceutics

Karolina Frączek, Agnieszka Kowalczyk, Martyna Pekala, Kaja Kasarello, Grażyna Sygitowicz, Dorota Sulejczak, Malgorzata Zaremba, Marek Konop, Malgorzata Frankowska, Malgorzata Filip, Magdalena Bujalska-Zadrozny, Patrycja Kleczkowska

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Preclinical Research (CBP), Department of Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
  2. Centre for Preclinical Research (CBP), Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
  3. Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
  4. Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
  5. Centre for Preclinical Research (CBP), Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
  6. Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Kozielska 4, 01-163 Warsaw, Poland.
  7. Centre for Preclinical Research (CBP), Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
  8. Laboratory of Drug Addiction Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sm?tna 12, 31-343 Krakow, Poland.

PMID: 33375279 PMCID: PMC7823937 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13010029

Abstract

Recently, a well-known anti-alcohol agent, disulfiram (DSF), has gain much interest, as it was found to be effective in the treatment of cocaine abusers, thus also giving hope for patients addicted to opioids and other illicit drugs. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the possible outcome that might occur within the subacute co-administration of both morphine (MRF) and DSF in rats, but in the absence of ethanol challenge. As observed, intraperitoneal DSF dose-dependently enhanced MRF-mediated analgesia with the maximal efficacy at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Furthermore, MRF-induced tolerance and aggressive behavior were significantly reduced by DSF (100 mg/kg, i.p.) in comparison to MRF solely. Nonetheless, significant blood biochemical markers of hepatotoxicity were found (i.e., alteration in the levels of glutathione, blood urea nitrogen, etc.), following a combination of both drugs. Likewise, histological analysis of liver tissue revealed severe changes in the group of DSF + MRF, which includes swelling, cell death, damage to certain vessels, and hemorrhages into the liver parenchyma. Our findings indicate that DSF should be used with extreme caution, especially within the course of subacute concomitant use with MRF, as several possible side effects may take place.

Keywords: analgesia; disulfiram; hepatotoxicity morphine; side effects

References

  1. J Med Case Rep. 2016 Mar 31;10:72 - PubMed
  2. Alcohol. 1994 Jan-Feb;11(1):7-10 - PubMed
  3. Physiol Rev. 2001 Jan;81(1):299-343 - PubMed
  4. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989 Jun 1;99(1):139-47 - PubMed
  5. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1967 Dec;28(4):649-54 - PubMed
  6. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Feb;219(4):1153-64 - PubMed
  7. J Toxicol Sci. 1990 May;15(2):63-73 - PubMed
  8. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012 Jan;3(1):45-50 - PubMed
  9. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1972;50:266-97 - PubMed
  10. Pharmacol Res. 2007 Feb;55(2):117-21 - PubMed
  11. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;34(3):253-9 - PubMed
  12. Addict Health. 2015 Summer-Autumn;7(3-4):130-9 - PubMed
  13. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jan 5;265(1):264-73 - PubMed
  14. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2000;60(4):557-67 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009 May 1;609(1-3):51-7 - PubMed
  16. Biol Lett. 2008 Feb 23;4(1):119-22 - PubMed
  17. Behav Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;29(5):393-399 - PubMed
  18. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Nov;35(12):2440-9 - PubMed
  19. Biochem Pharmacol. 1986 Oct 15;35(20):3543-8 - PubMed
  20. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020 Jan;193(1):174-184 - PubMed
  21. Br Med J. 1966 Aug 20;2(5511):449-50 - PubMed
  22. J Biosci. 2005 Mar;30(2):245-52 - PubMed
  23. Drug Metab Rev. 2001 Aug-Nov;33(3-4):255-71 - PubMed
  24. Life Sci. 1967 Jul 1;6(13):1389-98 - PubMed
  25. Addict Behav. 2004 Aug;29(6):1123-8 - PubMed
  26. Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;96(1):131-3 - PubMed
  27. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 15;218(Pt 2):223-7 - PubMed
  28. Biol Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;14(2):337-44 - PubMed
  29. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991 Sep;125(3):246-52 - PubMed
  30. J Oleo Sci. 2009;58(9):485-90 - PubMed
  31. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Jan;68(1):93-8 - PubMed
  32. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 Mar;56(3):409-15 - PubMed
  33. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002 Nov;78(3):637-47 - PubMed
  34. Anal Biochem. 1968 Oct 24;25(1):192-205 - PubMed
  35. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:38-44 - PubMed
  36. Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):243-4 - PubMed
  37. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;96(4):468-76 - PubMed
  38. Addict Behav. 1993 May-Jun;18(3):263-8 - PubMed
  39. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1968 Mar;20(3):247-8 - PubMed
  40. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):830-1 - PubMed
  41. Mol Interv. 2009 Aug;9(4):175-87 - PubMed
  42. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):147-8 - PubMed
  43. J Ark Med Soc. 2014 Jun;110(13):280-3 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support