Display options
Share it on

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 18;23(1):e17680. doi: 10.2196/17680.

Evaluation of the Liver Disease Information in Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Longitudinal Study.

Journal of medical Internet research

Fei Sun, Fuchun Yang, Shusen Zheng

Affiliations

  1. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

PMID: 33459597 PMCID: PMC7850904 DOI: 10.2196/17680

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The internet has changed the way of people acquiring health information. Previous studies have shown that Wikipedia is a reasonably reliable medical resource, and it has been ranked higher than other general websites in various search engines. Baidu Encyclopedia is one of the most popular encyclopedia websites in China. However, no studies have shown the quality of the content provided in the Baidu Encyclopedia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of liver disease information provided by Wikipedia (in English) and Baidu Encyclopedia (in Chinese) and to perform a comparison of the quality and timeliness of the articles published in these two encyclopedias. Moreover, a 3-year follow-up study was conducted to compare if the information in both these websites was updated regularly over this period.

METHODS: We searched for information on liver diseases by using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision Version 2016 codes on Wikipedia (in English) and Baidu Encyclopedia (in Chinese). The quality of the articles was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, which consists of 3 sections. We recorded the latest editing date of the webpages and calculated the date interval to evaluate the update timeliness of these websites.

RESULTS: We found 22 entries on liver diseases in Baidu Encyclopedia and 15 articles in Wikipedia between September 15, 2016, and September 30, 2016, and we found 25 entries in Baidu Encyclopedia and 16 articles in Wikipedia between September 15, 2019, and September 30, 2019. In section 1 of the DISCERN instrument, the mean (SE) scores of Baidu Encyclopedia entries were significantly lower than those of Wikipedia articles. In section 2 and section 3 of the DISCERN instrument, the DISCERN scores of Baidu Encyclopedia entries were lower than those of Wikipedia articles, but the differences were not statistically significant. The total DISCERN scores of Baidu Encyclopedia entries were significantly lower than those of Wikipedia articles. The update interval of the entries in Baidu Encyclopedia was found to be significantly longer than that of the articles in Wikipedia.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the quality of articles and the reliability of the research content on liver diseases in Wikipedia are better than those of the entries in Baidu Encyclopedia. However, the quality of the treatment choices provided in both Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia is not satisfactory. Wikipedia is updated more frequently than Baidu Encyclopedia, thereby ensuring that the information presented has the most recent research findings. The findings of our study suggest that in order to find accurate health information, it is important to seek the help of medical professionals instead of looking for a prescription amid the confusing information provided on the internet.

©Fei Sun, Fuchun Yang, Shusen Zheng. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.01.2021.

Keywords: Baidu Encyclopedia; DISCERN instrument; Wikipedia; health information; internet; liver disease; timeliness; website

References

  1. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Jun 19;6(1):e18076 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;26(2):155-63 - PubMed
  3. Semin Dial. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):159-63 - PubMed
  4. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208783 - PubMed
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 04;17(3):e62 - PubMed
  6. Database (Oxford). 2012 Mar 20;2012:bar060 - PubMed
  7. New Rev Hypermedia Multimed. 2017 Jan 2;23(1):29-50 - PubMed
  8. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221596 - PubMed
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 30;20(11):e11655 - PubMed
  10. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;16(1):57-73 - PubMed
  11. Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jan;133:104000 - PubMed
  12. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;166:66-70 - PubMed
  13. Health Info Libr J. 2017 Dec;34(4):268-283 - PubMed
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 03;16(12):e260 - PubMed
  15. BMC Cancer. 2018 May 2;18(1):491 - PubMed
  16. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015 Mar;39(1):5-14 - PubMed
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 04;19(4):e92 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0118289 - PubMed
  19. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 06;5(10):e008187 - PubMed
  20. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e12450 - PubMed
  21. J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Jun;132(6):560-563 - PubMed
  22. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e15554 - PubMed
  23. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 May;114(5):368-73 - PubMed
  24. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):926-944 - PubMed
  25. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11 - PubMed
  26. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Feb;86:91-103 - PubMed
  27. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):471-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types