Display options
Cite
Khan SA, Tushar, Nezam S, et al. Comparison and Evaluation of Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals Using Vision Inspection System: An . J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(6):736-742doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20.
Khan, S. A., Tushar, Nezam, S., Singh, P., Kumari, N., & Singh, S. S. (2020). Comparison and Evaluation of Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals Using Vision Inspection System: An . Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 10(6), 736-742. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20
Khan, Shabab Ahmed, et al. "Comparison and Evaluation of Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals Using Vision Inspection System: An ." Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry vol. 10,6 (2020): 736-742. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20
Khan SA, Tushar, Nezam S, Singh P, Kumari N, Singh SS. Comparison and Evaluation of Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals Using Vision Inspection System: An . J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Nov 24;10(6):736-742. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20. eCollection 2020. PMID: 33437707; PMCID: PMC7791581.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Nov 24;10(6):736-742. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20. eCollection 2020.

Comparison and Evaluation of Linear Dimensional Accuracy of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals Using Vision Inspection System: An .

Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Shabab Ahmed Khan, Tushar, Sumaiya Nezam, Puja Singh, Neelu Kumari, Shashank Shekher Singh

Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown & Bridge, NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
  2. Department of Prosthodontics & Crown and Bridge, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
  3. Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Nalanda Medical College Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
  4. Department of Periodontology & Implantology, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar, India.
  5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.

PMID: 33437707 PMCID: PMC7791581 DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_282_20

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Making an impression represents a crucial step in fabrication of a prosthesis. Elastomers are the most commonly used materials for precise and accurate recording and reproduction of tooth morphology and surrounding soft tissue.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the linear dimensional accuracy of three elastomeric impression materials: addition silicone, condensation silicone, and polyether at different time intervals up to 15 days using a vision inspection system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dimensional accuracy of impression materials was measured at certain designated time periods using stainless steel die. The impressions of die were made using one representative material of each type of elastomeric impression material. The die along with the impression material in the mold was held using a clamp and put in a water bath maintained at mouth temperature. The linear dimensional changes taking place in each material with time were measured using the vision inspection system.

RESULTS: On comparison with master die impression at 30min, 1h, and 1½ h time interval, a significant decreased mean dimension of condensation silicone was observed, whereas addition silicone and polyether showed statistically nonsignificant difference. At 2, 3, 4, and 12h time span, a significant difference in mean dimension of addition and condensation silicone was noted, whereas polyether showed a nonsignificant difference. At 24h, 1 week, and 15 days duration, on comparison with the master die, a significant reduction in mean dimension of condensation silicone was discovered, whereas addition silicone and polyether showed nonsignificant difference.

CONCLUSION: Polyether showed significantly lesser dimensional changes among all three materials, though the differences were small enough to be considered clinically acceptable.

Copyright: © 2020 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.

Keywords: Addition silicone; condensation silicone; elastomers; linear dimensional accuracy; polyether

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Jul;52(1):120-5 - PubMed
  2. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Jul 01;12(4):272-8 - PubMed
  3. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Jun;65(6):748-57 - PubMed
  4. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;15(3):195-8 - PubMed
  5. Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):188-96 - PubMed
  6. J Dent. 2004 Nov;32(8):603-9 - PubMed
  7. Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg. 1989 Sep;16(3):425-8 - PubMed
  8. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;48(2):vi-vii, 445-70 - PubMed
  9. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977 Apr;94(4):733-41 - PubMed
  10. Molecules. 2016 Mar 05;21(3):311 - PubMed
  11. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jul;51(3):629-42, vi - PubMed
  12. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Mar;45(3):329-33 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011 Dec;19(4):163-6 - PubMed
  14. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Apr;53(4):484-90 - PubMed
  15. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jul;21(7):912-920 - PubMed
  16. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Jan;45(1):89-94 - PubMed

Publication Types