Display options
Share it on

Front Robot AI. 2020 Mar 05;7:28. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00028. eCollection 2020.

Differences in Spontaneous Interactions of Autistic Children in an Interaction With an Adult and Humanoid Robot.

Frontiers in robotics and AI

Bob R Schadenberg, Dennis Reidsma, Dirk K J Heylen, Vanessa Evers

Affiliations

  1. Human Media Interaction, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  2. Institute of Science and Technology for Humanity, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

PMID: 33501197 PMCID: PMC7805683 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00028

Abstract

Robots are promising tools for promoting engagement of autistic children in interventions and thereby increasing the amount of learning opportunities. However, designing deliberate robot behavior aimed at engaging autistic children remains challenging. Our current understanding of what interactions with a robot, or facilitated by a robot, are particularly motivating to autistic children is limited to qualitative reports with small sample sizes. Translating insights from these reports to design is difficult due to the large individual differences among autistic children in their needs, interests, and abilities. To address these issues, we conducted a descriptive study and report on an analysis of how 31 autistic children spontaneously interacted with a humanoid robot and an adult within the context of a robot-assisted intervention, as well as which individual characteristics were associated with the observed interactions. For this analysis, we used video recordings of autistic children engaged in a robot-assisted intervention that were recorded as part of the DE-ENIGMA database. The results showed that the autistic children frequently engaged in exploratory and functional interactions with the robot spontaneously, as well as in interactions with the adult that were elicited by the robot. In particular, we observed autistic children frequently initiating interactions aimed at making the robot do a certain action. Autistic children with stronger language ability, social functioning, and fewer autism spectrum-related symptoms, initiated more functional interactions with the robot and more robot-elicited interactions with the adult. We conclude that the children's individual characteristics, in particular the child's language ability, can be indicative of which types of interaction they are more likely to find interesting. Taking these into account for the design of deliberate robot behavior, coupled with providing more autonomy over the robot's behavior to the autistic children, appears promising for promoting engagement and facilitating more learning opportunities.

Copyright © 2020 Schadenberg, Reidsma, Heylen and Evers.

Keywords: autism spectrum condition; child-robot interaction; descriptive study; individual characteristics; interaction types

References

  1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Apr;37(4):613-27 - PubMed
  2. J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Jun;23(2):281-307 - PubMed
  3. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Aug;40(8):946-57 - PubMed
  4. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;39(5):765-75 - PubMed
  5. Autism. 2003 Dec;7(4):379-90 - PubMed
  6. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 May;39(5):693-705 - PubMed
  7. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 May;43(5):1038-49 - PubMed
  8. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):54-67 - PubMed
  9. J Autism Dev Disord. 1987 Sep;17(3):349-64 - PubMed
  10. Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1577 - PubMed
  11. Autism. 2003 Dec;7(4):361-77 - PubMed
  12. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;45(2):212-29 - PubMed
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):549-59 - PubMed
  14. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 May;38(5):857-66 - PubMed
  15. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1983 Oct;24(4):613-20 - PubMed
  16. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Nov;45(11):3746-55 - PubMed
  17. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1424-1433 - PubMed
  18. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jan;46(1):113-126 - PubMed
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):3027-31 - PubMed
  20. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006 Jun;31(2):101-14 - PubMed
  21. Autism. 2003 Dec;7(4):391-9 - PubMed
  22. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:275-94 - PubMed
  23. Mol Autism. 2013 May 15;4(1):12 - PubMed
  24. Autism. 2014 Jul;18(5):598-608 - PubMed
  25. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 May;44(4):543-51 - PubMed
  26. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Nov;36(8):993-1005 - PubMed
  27. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jul;46(7):2464-79 - PubMed
  28. Autism Res. 2012 Jun;5(3):160-79 - PubMed
  29. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012 Jan;6(1):249-262 - PubMed
  30. Except Child. 1991 May;57(6):521-35 - PubMed
  31. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013 Oct;16(5):345-56 - PubMed
  32. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 May;68(5):459-65 - PubMed
  33. Autism. 2015 Feb;19(2):248-51 - PubMed
  34. J Autism Dev Disord. 1997 Dec;27(6):677-96 - PubMed
  35. J Autism Dev Disord. 1998 Dec;28(6):487-97 - PubMed
  36. Autism. 2015 Jul;19(5):622-36 - PubMed
  37. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):67-77 - PubMed
  38. J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jul;90:1-11 - PubMed
  39. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 May;42(5):863-73 - PubMed
  40. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2017 Jan-Dec;2: - PubMed

Publication Types