Display options
Share it on

Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jan 25;14:273-278. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S296299. eCollection 2021.

The Knowledge of Health Professionals About the Application of Cricoid Pressure in a Low-Income Country: A Single-Center Survey Study.

International journal of general medicine

Metages Hunie, Tiruwork Desse, Diriba Teshome, Simegnew Kibret, Moges Gelaw, Efrem Fenta

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

PMID: 33531829 PMCID: PMC7846866 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S296299

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of cricoid pressure requires good knowledge and practice of health professionals who are working in operation theatres to prevent pulmonary aspiration. This study aims to assess the application of cricoid pressure knowledge and practice in health professionals who are working in the operation theatres.

METHODS: This survey-based study was conducted in health care professionals who are working in the operation theatre of Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from November 1 to December 1, 2020. A structured checklist was used to collect data regarding the knowledge and practice of the application of cricoid pressure.

RESULTS: A total of 43 health professionals who are working in the operation theaters were involved in this study with a response rate of 81%. The correct anatomic position of cricoid cartilage was not identified in 67% of nurses. We found that 78% of anesthetists did not use the nasogastric tube for decompression, and 83% of them complain of difficult intubation during the application of cricoid pressure.

CONCLUSION: Health care professionals who are working in operation theatres had poor knowledge and practice in the application of cricoid pressure.

© 2021 Hunie et al.

Keywords: cricoid pressure; health professionals; knowledge; practice

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.

References

  1. Trials. 2012 Feb 16;13:17 - PubMed
  2. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):738-752 - PubMed
  3. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1971 Aug;80(4):492-506 - PubMed
  4. Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):414-25 - PubMed
  5. Anesth Analg. 1992 Mar;74(3):457-9 - PubMed
  6. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2016 May-Jun;66(3):283-8 - PubMed
  7. Singapore Med J. 2012 Sep;53(9):620-2 - PubMed
  8. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jan;4(1):42-9 - PubMed
  9. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Dec;88(12):1034-7 - PubMed
  10. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Aug;31(4):388-91 - PubMed
  11. J Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jan;35(1):11-5 - PubMed
  12. Anaesthesia. 2002 Nov;57(11):1098-101 - PubMed
  13. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Apr;18(2):106-10 - PubMed
  14. BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 28;12(1):546 - PubMed
  15. JAMA Surg. 2019 Jan 1;154(1):9-17 - PubMed
  16. Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar;75(3):313-322 - PubMed
  17. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Jan;14(1):43-7 - PubMed
  18. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 May;15(5):402-6 - PubMed
  19. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jan;132(1):261-267 - PubMed
  20. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;76(6):877-8 - PubMed
  21. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1992 Sep;1(4):195-8 - PubMed
  22. J Emerg Med. 2012 May;42(5):606-11 - PubMed
  23. J Perioper Pract. 2011 Jul;21(7):234-8 - PubMed
  24. Anaesthesia. 1983 May;38(5):457-60 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 1961 Aug 19;2(7199):404-6 - PubMed
  26. J Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;20(1):29-31 - PubMed
  27. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015 Dec;76(12):730 - PubMed
  28. AORN J. 2000 Dec;72(6):1018-28, 1030 - PubMed

Publication Types