Display options
Share it on

Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Feb 19; doi: 10.1111/nicc.12609. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Enteral nutrition feeding practices by intensive care nurses: A retrospective evaluation.

Nursing in critical care

Claire L Crossfield, Philip L Russo, Tracey K Bucknall

Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Geelong, Australia.
  2. Department of Nursing Research, Cabrini Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
  3. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Victoria, Burwood, Australia.

PMID: 33605511 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12609

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) is an integral component of standard management of critically ill patients in intensive care. However, achieving adequate nutrition in this environment continues to present many challenges.

DESIGN: A descriptive exploratory design using a retrospective review of medical records.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to describe nursing practice associated with EN feeding and identify barriers to optimal nutritional delivery in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS: Patients admitted to a major Australian metropolitan health service ICU during a 6-month period, and who received EN for at least 72 hours, were eligible for inclusion. Documented text from patient medical records was analysed using content analysis. Numerical data were analysed using SPSS software (version 25.0). Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included in the study. The mean time from admission to EN commencement was 12.6 hours, with 59.3% commenced within 12 hours of admission. Only 9.3% of patients commenced EN at the target rate. Of the 150 patients, 24 (16%) received 80% of nutrition targets within 72 hours of admission. Patients who had EN commenced within 12 hours of admission and at the target rate were significantly more likely to achieve nutritional requirements (P = <.01). Patients who received an initial dietitian review within 24 hours of admission were more likely to achieve nutrition requirements (P = <.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Commencing EN on time and meeting target volumes remains challenging in the ICU patient. Airway management, procedural requirements, and delayed dietitian review for prescribed hourly rate initiation provide barriers to optimal nutrition delivery to critically ill patients. Tackling these barriers may require interdisciplinary interventions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Providing adequate nutrition to critically ill patients is challenging. This study provides evidence that day's one and two are problematic to EN delivery; particularly concerning airway management, procedural requirements, and delayed dietitian review for prescribed hourly rate initiation. Highlighting the need for further research into these aspects of nutrition management.

© 2021 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.

Keywords: clinical decision making; clinical guidelines; critical care; enteral nutrition; feeding practices

References

  1. Marshall AP, Cahill NE, Gramlich L, MacDonald G, Alberd C, Heyland DK. (2012). Optimizing nutrition in intensive care units: empowering critical care nurses to be effective agents of change. Am J Crit Care; 21: 186-194. - PubMed
  2. Stewart ML. (2014). Interruptions in enteral nutrition delivery in critically ill patients and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care Nurse; 34: 14-22. - PubMed
  3. Ridley EJ, Davies AR, Hodgson CL, Deane A, Bailey M, Cooper DJ. (2018). Delivery of full predicted energy from nutrition and the effect on mortality in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Nutr; 37: 1913-1925. - PubMed
  4. Orinovsky I, Raizman E. (2018). Improvement of nutritional intake in intensive care unit patients via a nurse-led enteral nutrition feeding protocol. Critl Care Nurse; 38: 38-44. - PubMed
  5. Lottes Stewart M. (2014). Nutrition support protocols and their influence on the delivery of enteral nutrition: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 11: 194-199. - PubMed
  6. Kozeniecki M, McAndrew N, Patel J. (2016). ICU and process related barriers to optimising enteral nutrition in a tertiary medical intensive care unit. Nutr Clin Prac; 31: 80-85. - PubMed
  7. Tsai JR, Chang WT, Sheu CC, Wu YJ, Sheu YH, Liu PL, Ker CG, Huang MC. (2011). Inadequate energy delivery during early critical illness correlates with increased risk of mortality in patients who survive at least seven days: a retrospective study. Clin Nutr; 30: 209-214. - PubMed
  8. Bendavid I, Singer P, Theilla M, Themessl-Huber M, Suls I, Mouhieddine M, Schuh C, Mora B, Hiesmayr M. (2017). Nutrition Day ICU: a 7 year worldwide prevalence study of nutrition practice in intensive care. Clin Nutr; 36: 1122-1129. - PubMed
  9. Elke G, Wang M, Weiler N, Day AG, Heyland DK. (2014). Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large international nutrition database. Crit Care Med; 18: R29. - PubMed
  10. Lottes Stewart M, Biddle M, Thomas T. (2017). Evaluation of current feeding practices in the critically ill: a retrospective chart review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 38: 24-30. - PubMed
  11. Heyland DK, Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Sun X, Day AG, McClave SA. (2010). Impact of enteral feeding protocols on enteral nutrition delivery: results of a multicentre observational study. JPEN; 34: 675-684. - PubMed
  12. Jarden RJ, Sutton LJ. (2014). A practice change initiative to improve the provision of enteral nutrition to intensive care patients. Nurs Crit Care; 20: 242-255. - PubMed
  13. Elo S, Kyngas H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs; 62: 107-115. - PubMed
  14. Tian F, Heighes PT, Allingstrup MJ, Doig GS. (2018). Early enteral nutrition provided within 24 hours of ICU admission: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med; 46: 1049-1056. - PubMed
  15. Reeves A, White H, Sosnowski K, Leveritt M, Desbrow B, Jones M. (2012). Multidisciplinary evaluation of a critical care enteral feeding algorithm. Nutr Diet; 69: 242-249. - PubMed
  16. Cahill NE, Murch L, Cook D, Heyland DK. (2012). Barriers to feeding critically ill patients: a multicentre survey of critical care nurses. Crit Care; 27: 727-734. - PubMed
  17. Wikjord K, Dahl V, Sovik S. (2017). Effects on nutritional care practice after implementation of a flow chart-based nutrition support protocol in an intensive care unit. Nurs Open.; 4: 282-291. - PubMed
  18. Al Kalaldeh M. (2017). The influence of implementing nurse-led enteral nutrition guidelines on care delivery in the critically ill: a cohort study. Gastrointest Nurs; 15: 34-42. - PubMed
  19. Passier RHA, Davies AR, Ridley E, McClure J, Murphy D, Scheinkestel CD. (2013). Periprocedural cessation of nutrition in the intensive care unit: opportunities for improvement. Intensive Care Med; 39: 1221-1226. - PubMed
  20. Taylor B, Brody R, Denmark R, Southard R, Byham-Gray L. (2014). Improving enteral delivery through the adoption of the Feed early enteral diet adequately for maximum effed (FEED ME) protocol in a surgical trauma ICU. Nutr Clin Prac; 29: 639-645. - PubMed
  21. Coyer F, Miles S, Gosley S, Fulbrook P, Sketcher-Baker K, Cook JL, Whitmore J. (2017). Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: a state-wide comparison. Crit Care; 30: 244-250. - PubMed

Publication Types