Display options
Share it on

Brain Commun. 2021 Jan 23;3(1):fcaa226. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa226. eCollection 2021.

Long-term motor deficit in brain tumour surgery with preserved intra-operative motor-evoked potentials.

Brain communications

Davide Giampiccolo, Cristiano Parisi, Pietro Meneghelli, Vincenzo Tramontano, Federica Basaldella, Marco Pasetto, Giampietro Pinna, Luigi Cattaneo, Francesco Sala

Affiliations

  1. Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  2. Division of Neurology and Intraoperative Neurophysiology Unit, University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  3. CIMEC-Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

PMID: 33615216 PMCID: PMC7884605 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa226

Abstract

Muscle motor-evoked potentials are commonly monitored during brain tumour surgery in motor areas, as these are assumed to reflect the integrity of descending motor pathways, including the corticospinal tract. However, while the loss of muscle motor-evoked potentials at the end of surgery is associated with long-term motor deficits (muscle motor-evoked potential-related deficits), there is increasing evidence that motor deficit can occur despite no change in muscle motor-evoked potentials (muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits), particularly after surgery of non-primary regions involved in motor control. In this study, we aimed to investigate the incidence of muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits and to identify the associated brain regions. We retrospectively reviewed 125 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for peri-Rolandic lesions using intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. Intraoperative changes in muscle motor-evoked potentials were correlated with motor outcome, assessed by the Medical Research Council scale. We performed voxel-lesion-symptom mapping to identify which resected regions were associated with short- and long-term muscle motor-evoked potential-associated motor deficits. Muscle motor-evoked potentials reductions significantly predicted long-term motor deficits. However, in more than half of the patients who experienced long-term deficits (12/22 patients), no muscle motor-evoked potential reduction was reported during surgery. Lesion analysis showed that muscle motor-evoked potential-related long-term motor deficits were associated with direct or ischaemic damage to the corticospinal tract, whereas muscle motor-evoked potential-unrelated deficits occurred when supplementary motor areas were resected in conjunction with dorsal premotor regions and the anterior cingulate. Our results indicate that long-term motor deficits unrelated to the corticospinal tract can occur more often than currently reported. As these deficits cannot be predicted by muscle motor-evoked potentials, a combination of awake and/or novel asleep techniques other than muscle motor-evoked potentials monitoring should be implemented.

© The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.

Keywords: SMA-syndrome; brain mapping; intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM); motor-evoked potentials (MEPs); neuro-oncology

References

  1. Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):448-50 - PubMed
  2. Qual Life Res. 1996 Feb;5(1):139-50 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;127(1):123-131 - PubMed
  4. Neurosurgery. 1993 Feb;32(2):219-26 - PubMed
  5. Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26;15(2):122-8 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb 23;130(1):17-27 - PubMed
  7. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jun;130(6):952-959 - PubMed
  8. Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1060-70; discussion 1070-1 - PubMed
  9. J Neurosurg. 2018 Aug 17;131(1):201-208 - PubMed
  10. Neurol Sci. 2005 Jun;26(2):108-16 - PubMed
  11. Brain Behav. 2018 Feb 05;8(3):e00926 - PubMed
  12. J Neurosurg. 2013 Jul;119(1):7-14 - PubMed
  13. Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):2482-2494 - PubMed
  14. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jan 10;20(1):103-112 - PubMed
  15. Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2009 Nov;70(4):171-5 - PubMed
  16. J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):640-7 - PubMed
  17. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jan-Feb;78(1):66-71 - PubMed
  18. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Nov;9(11):856-69 - PubMed
  19. Neurosurgery. 2004 May;54(5):1061-70; discussion 1070-2 - PubMed
  20. Brain Stimul. 2020 May - Jun;13(3):819-831 - PubMed
  21. Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Apr;221(3):1751-66 - PubMed
  22. Neurosurgery. 2010 Aug;67(2):302-13 - PubMed
  23. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;69(6):828-31 - PubMed
  24. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;81(1):99-110 - PubMed
  25. Phys Ther. 1996 Mar;76(3):248-59 - PubMed
  26. Neuron. 2015 Dec 16;88(6):1086-1107 - PubMed
  27. Neurology. 1962 Dec;12:876-81 - PubMed
  28. J Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;125(6):1431-1442 - PubMed
  29. Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Jun;116(3):929-52 - PubMed
  30. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jun;155(6):951-7 - PubMed
  31. Brain Cogn. 2020 Jul;142:105583 - PubMed
  32. J Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;106(4):582-92 - PubMed
  33. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;35(4):157-63 - PubMed
  34. J Neurosurg. 1996 Oct;85(4):542-9 - PubMed
  35. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 - PubMed
  36. Arch Neurol. 1980 Jan;37(1):6-10 - PubMed
  37. J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1015-24 - PubMed
  38. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2578-92 - PubMed
  39. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;85(12):1377-85 - PubMed
  40. J Neurol Sci. 1977 Dec;34(3):301-14 - PubMed
  41. J Neurosurg. 2000 Apr;92(4):676-87 - PubMed
  42. Br J Neurosurg. 2000 Jun;14(3):204-10 - PubMed
  43. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):e395-403 - PubMed
  44. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28 - PubMed
  45. Neuro Oncol. 2014 Aug;16(8):1110-28 - PubMed
  46. Cortex. 2020 Jul;128:297-311 - PubMed
  47. Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):801-14 - PubMed
  48. Neurosurgery. 2002 Feb;50(2):297-303; discussion 303-5 - PubMed
  49. J Neurosurg. 2004 Mar;100(3):389-99 - PubMed

Publication Types