Display options
Share it on

Invest New Drugs. 2021 Aug;39(4):1047-1056. doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01081-x. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

First-in-human, phase I/IIa study of CRLX301, a nanoparticle drug conjugate containing docetaxel, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid malignancies.

Investigational new drugs

Sarina A Piha-Paul, Kyaw Z Thein, Paul De Souza, Richard Kefford, Tara Gangadhar, Christopher Smith, Shelly Schuster, William C Zamboni, Claire E Dees, Ben Markman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  3. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/ Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
  4. Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  5. Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  6. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  7. NewLink Genetics Corporation, Ames, IA, USA.
  8. UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Institute of Nanomedicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  9. Division of Medical Oncology, University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  10. Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health/Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

PMID: 33594602 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01081-x

Abstract

Background This was a phase I/IIa study to investigate the tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK)/ pharmacodynamics (PD) of CRLX301, CDP-based nanoparticle formulation of docetaxel. Methods The study was conducted in two parts. In part 1, dose-escalation using a standard 3 + 3 design was performed in two dosing schedules (every week (QW) and every 3 weeks (Q3W)). Part 2 was comprised of a dose expansion at 75 mg/m2 Q3W. PK studies were performed on both dosing schedules. Results Forty-two patients were recruited onto the study with a median age of 64(range 38-76); median number of prior systemic therapies was 5(range 0-10). Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included: neutropenia (21.4 %), infusion related reaction (11.9 %), anemia (7.1 %), fatigue (4.8 %), diarrhea (4.8 %), and peripheral neuropathy (4.8 %). The maximum tolerated dose was 75 mg/m2 given on the Q3W schedule and was not determined on the QW schedule. In this heavily pre-treated population, four patients (12.9 %) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months and 2 patients (6.5 %) achieved partial response (PR) for a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 19.4 % (6/31 patients). The PRs were seen in prostate and breast adenocarcinoma (one each). CRLX301 exhibited some PK advantages over docetaxel including higher retention of drug in plasma, slower clearance and controlled slow release of docetaxel from the carrier. Conclusions In this heavily pretreated patient population, the safety profile was acceptable for CRLX301 therapy. There was some evidence of preliminary tumor efficacy, but further work is necessary to find the optimal dose and schedule of this formulation.Clinicaltrials.gov trial registration number: NCT02380677 (Date of registration: March 2, 2015).

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Keywords: CRLX301; Docetaxel; First‐in‐human study; Nanoparticle; Phase I/IIa study

References

  1. Herbst RS, Khuri FR (2003) Mode of action of docetaxel - a basis for combination with novel anticancer agents. Cancer Treat Rev 29(5):407–415 - PubMed
  2. Aapro M (1996) The scientific rationale for developing taxoids. Anti-Cancer Drugs 7(Suppl 2):33–36 - PubMed
  3. Montero A, Fossella F, Hortobagyi G, Valero V (2005) Docetaxel for treatment of solid tumours: a systematic review of clinical data. Lancet Oncol 6(4):229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70094-2 - PubMed
  4. Saloustros E, Mavroudis D, Georgoulias V (2008) Paclitaxel and docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 9(15):2603–2616. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.9.15.2603 - PubMed
  5. Kuppens IE (2006) Current state of the art of new tubulin inhibitors in the clinic. Curr Clin Pharmacol 1(1):57–70 - PubMed
  6. Baker J, Ajani J, Scotte F, Winther D, Martin M, Aapro MS, von Minckwitz G (2009) Docetaxel-related side effects and their management. Eur J Oncol Nurs 13(1):49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2008.10.003 - PubMed
  7. Engels FK, Mathot RA, Verweij J (2007) Alternative drug formulations of docetaxel: a review. Anti-Cancer Drugs 18(2):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0b013e3280113338 - PubMed
  8. Gelderblom H, Verweij J, Nooter K, Sparreboom A (2001) Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation. Eur J Cancer 37 (13):1590–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00171-x - PubMed
  9. ten Tije AJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A (2003) Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles. Clin Pharmacokinet 42(7):665–685. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005 - PubMed
  10. Wilczewska AZ, Niemirowicz K, Markiewicz KH, Car H (2012) Nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. Pharmacol Rep 64(5):1020–1037 - PubMed
  11. Din FU, Aman W, Ullah I, Qureshi OS, Mustapha O, Shafique S, Zeb A (2017) Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. Int J Nanomed 12:7291–7309. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.S146315 - PubMed
  12. Heidel JD, Schluep T (2012) Cyclodextrin-containing polymers: versatile platforms of drug delivery materials. J Drug Deliv 2012:262731. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/262731 - PubMed
  13. Lazarus D, Kabir S, Eliasof S (2012) Abstract 5643: CRLX301, a novel tumor-targeted taxane nanopharmaceutical. Can Res 72(8 Supplement):5643–5643. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.Am2012-5643 - PubMed
  14. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 - PubMed
  15. Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD (2010) Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(2):281–289. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.09.4110 - PubMed
  16. Sonpavde G, Pond GR, Armstrong AJ, Galsky MD, Leopold L, Wood BA, Wang SL, Paolini J, Chen I, Chow-Maneval E, Mooney DJ, Lechuga M, Smith MR, Michaelson MD (2014) Radiographic progression by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-2 criteria as an intermediate endpoint for drug development in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int 114(6b):E25–E31. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12589 - PubMed
  17. Tran S, DeGiovanni PJ, Piel B, Rai P (2017) Cancer nanomedicine: a review of recent success in drug delivery. Clin Transl Med 6(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40169-017-0175-0 - PubMed
  18. Varan G, Benito JM, Mellet CO, Bilensoy E (2017) Development of polycationic amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles for anticancer drug delivery. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 8:1457–1468. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.8.145 - PubMed
  19. Erdogar N, Varan G, Bilensoy E (2017) Amphiphilic cyclodextrin derivatives for targeted drug delivery to tumors. Curr Top Med Chem 17(13):1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026616666161222101104 - PubMed
  20. Stella VJ, He Q (2008) Cyclodextrins. Toxicol Pathol 36(1):30–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623307310945 - PubMed
  21. Weiss GJ, Chao J, Neidhart JD, Ramanathan RK, Bassett D, Neidhart JA, Choi CHJ, Chow W, Chung V, Forman SJ, Garmey E, Hwang J, Kalinoski DL, Koczywas M, Longmate J, Melton RJ, Morgan R, Oliver J, Peterkin JJ, Ryan JL, Schluep T, Synold TW, Twardowski P, Davis ME, Yen Y (2013) First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of CRLX101, a cyclodextrin-containing polymer-camptothecin nanopharmaceutical in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. Investig New Drugs 31(4):986–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-012-9921-8 - PubMed
  22. Rivera E, Mejia JA, Arun BK, Adinin RB, Walters RS, Brewster A, Broglio KR, Yin G, Esmaeli B, Hortobagyi GN, Valero V (2008) Phase 3 study comparing the use of docetaxel on an every-3-week versus weekly schedule in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 112(7):1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23321 - PubMed
  23. Belfiglio M, Fanizza C, Tinari N, Ficorella C, Iacobelli S, Natoli C (2012) Meta-analysis of phase III trials of docetaxel alone or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(2):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-011-1091-0 - PubMed

Publication Types