Laryngoscope. 2021 Oct;131(10):2356-2360. doi: 10.1002/lary.29479. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.
The Laryngoscope
Janice T Chua, Emily Nguyen, Adwight Risbud, Sina Soltanzadeh-Zarandi, Ariel Lee, Shahrnaz Jamshidi, Soha Bayginejad, Mehdi Abouzari
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California, U.S.A.
PMID: 33625763
PMCID: PMC8382775 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29479
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess and characterize online ratings and comments on pediatric otolaryngologists and determine factors that correlate with higher ratings.
STUDY DESIGN: Online database analysis.
METHODS: All American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) members were queried on Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMDs, and Yelp for their online ratings and comments as of June 2020. Ratings were normalized for comparison on a five-point Likert scale. All comments were categorized based on context and positive or negative quality.
RESULTS: Of the 561 ASPO members, 489 (87%) were rated on at least one online platform. Of those rated, 410 (84%) were on Healthgrades, 429 (88%) on Vitals, 236 (48%) on RateMDs, and 72 (15%) on Yelp. Across all platforms, the average overall rating was 4.13 ± 0.03 (range, 1.00-5.00). We found significant positive correlations between overall ratings and specific ratings (P < .001) on all individual topics. In addition, the majority of all narrative comments were related to perceived physician bedside manner and clinical outcome, with negative comments correlating negatively with overall score (P < .05). Time spent with the physician was the only category in which both positive and negative comments showed significant correlation with the overall physician rating (P = .016 and P = .017, respectively). Attending a top-ranked medical school or residency program did not correlate with higher or lower ratings.
CONCLUSIONS: Online ratings and comments for pediatric otolaryngologists are largely influenced by patient and parent perceptions of physician competence, comforting bedside manner, and office and time management.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2356-2360, 2021.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Keywords: Pediatric otolaryngologist; online rating; patient rating; physician rating
References
- Ann Plast Surg. 2015 May;74 Suppl 1:S66-70 - PubMed
- Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014 Aug;43(8):359-63 - PubMed
- Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec;33(6):466-470 - PubMed
- Health Policy. 2014 Oct;118(1):66-73 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38 - PubMed
- JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jul;140(7):635-8 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):104-14 - PubMed
- Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1429-37 - PubMed
- Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jan;40(1):139-143 - PubMed
- J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S364-S367 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):435-6 - PubMed
- J Surg Res. 2018 Jul;227:1-6 - PubMed
- Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):1756-1762 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):685-92 - PubMed
- Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;155(3):411-5 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1152-6 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):260-73 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e966-75 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 01;15(2):e24 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):734-5 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25(9):942-6 - PubMed
- Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;21(1):9-19 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1463-6 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types
Grant support