Display options
Share it on

Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 01;15:625321. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625321. eCollection 2021.

A Critical Review of Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Neuromodulation in Clinical and Non-clinical Samples.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Tad T Brunyé, Joseph E Patterson, Thomas Wooten, Erika K Hussey

Affiliations

  1. U. S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center, Cognitive Science Team, Natick, MA, United States.
  2. Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.
  3. Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States.

PMID: 33597854 PMCID: PMC7882621 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.625321

Abstract

Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a neuromodulation tool used for treating several clinical disorders, including insomnia, anxiety, and depression. More recently, a limited number of studies have examined CES for altering affect, physiology, and behavior in healthy, non-clinical samples. The physiological, neurochemical, and metabolic mechanisms underlying CES effects are currently unknown. Computational modeling suggests that electrical current administered with CES at the earlobes can reach cortical and subcortical regions at very low intensities associated with subthreshold neuromodulatory effects, and studies using electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) show some effects on alpha band EEG activity, and modulation of the default mode network during CES administration. One theory suggests that CES modulates brain stem (e.g., medulla), limbic (e.g., thalamus, amygdala), and cortical (e.g., prefrontal cortex) regions and increases relative parasympathetic to sympathetic drive in the autonomic nervous system. There is no direct evidence supporting this theory, but one of its assumptions is that CES may induce its effects by stimulating afferent projections of the vagus nerve, which provides parasympathetic signals to the cardiorespiratory and digestive systems. In our critical review of studies using CES in clinical and non-clinical populations, we found severe methodological concerns, including potential conflicts of interest, risk of methodological and analytic biases, issues with sham credibility, lack of blinding, and a severe heterogeneity of CES parameters selected and employed across scientists, laboratories, institutions, and studies. These limitations make it difficult to derive consistent or compelling insights from the extant literature, tempering enthusiasm for CES and its potential to alter nervous system activity or behavior in meaningful or reliable ways. The lack of compelling evidence also motivates well-designed and relatively high-powered experiments to assess how CES might modulate the physiological, affective, and cognitive responses to stress. Establishing reliable empirical links between CES administration and human performance is critical for supporting its prospective use during occupational training, operations, or recovery, ensuring reliability and robustness of effects, characterizing if, when, and in whom such effects might arise, and ensuring that any benefits of CES outweigh the risks of adverse events.

Copyright © 2021 Brunyé, Patterson, Wooten and Hussey.

Keywords: electrotherapy; human performance; neuromodulation; non-invasive brain stimulation; psychiatry

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Sep;20(6):1681-7 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):765-72 - PubMed
  3. Cereb Cortex. 2002 Jun;12(6):663-9 - PubMed
  4. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996 Sep;43(9):939-43 - PubMed
  5. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;82(2):81-5 - PubMed
  6. Science. 1999 Apr 9;284(5412):238-40 - PubMed
  7. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Apr;29(2-3):169-95 - PubMed
  8. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):160-6 - PubMed
  9. Gen Dent. 1999 Jan-Feb;47(1):50-5 - PubMed
  10. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2016 Mar;29(1):11-7 - PubMed
  11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):677-95 - PubMed
  12. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:101992 - PubMed
  13. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1973 Aug;157(2):108-20 - PubMed
  14. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;41(4):256-61 - PubMed
  15. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug 15;70(4):327-33 - PubMed
  16. Depress Anxiety. 2016 Apr;33(4):289-99 - PubMed
  17. Front Psychol. 2015 May 19;6:621 - PubMed
  18. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76 - PubMed
  19. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;36(1):169-76 - PubMed
  20. Physiol Meas. 2018 Nov 26;39(11):114007 - PubMed
  21. J Int Med Res. 2013 Dec;41(6):1788-95 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 2011 Feb 24;470(7335):437 - PubMed
  23. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001 Jun;41(2):143-53 - PubMed
  24. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 3:1058-68 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jul;18(4):331-44 - PubMed
  26. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010 Nov;48(11):37-42 - PubMed
  27. Pain. 1981 Apr;10(2):169-172 - PubMed
  28. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Nov;203(11):827-35 - PubMed
  29. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):975-91 - PubMed
  30. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 May;62(5):1272-80 - PubMed
  31. Headache. 1989 Jul;29(7):445-50 - PubMed
  32. Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-Dec;7(6):871-7 - PubMed
  33. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 20;168(6):414-421 - PubMed
  34. Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Nov;24(1-2):161-71 - PubMed
  35. Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:280-7 - PubMed
  36. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1996 Apr-Jun;31(2):88-95 - PubMed
  37. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):198-206 - PubMed
  38. Psychosom Med. 1968 Sep-Oct;30(5):Suppl:576-607 - PubMed
  39. Mil Med. 2020 Feb 13;185(1-2):e53-e60 - PubMed
  40. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Nov 1;2(11):436-47 - PubMed
  41. Complement Ther Med. 2013 Feb;21(1):8-13 - PubMed
  42. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;37(3):318-32 - PubMed
  43. J ECT. 2013 Jun;29(2):e31-2 - PubMed
  44. Brain Res. 1981 Nov 9;224(1):83-93 - PubMed
  45. Biol Psychol. 1977 Mar;5(1):47-82 - PubMed
  46. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Jul;50(7):671-81 - PubMed
  47. Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):487-98 - PubMed
  48. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007 Jul;4(4):489-95 - PubMed
  49. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):311-41 - PubMed
  50. J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;164:171-7 - PubMed
  51. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):309-26 - PubMed
  52. Brain Behav. 2012 May;2(3):211-20 - PubMed
  53. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;14(2):85-94 - PubMed
  54. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:259-84 - PubMed
  55. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jan 24;8:2 - PubMed
  56. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Nov;70:98-105 - PubMed
  57. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 - PubMed
  58. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;69(3):412-7 - PubMed
  59. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:426-437 - PubMed
  60. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1996 Jun;21(2):121-9 - PubMed
  61. J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:785-788 - PubMed
  62. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 08;(7):CD010521 - PubMed
  63. US Army Med Dep J. 2014 Oct-Dec;:46-54 - PubMed
  64. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2014 Jun;1(2):64-73 - PubMed
  65. Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Aug 18;9:134-9 - PubMed
  66. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 26;(8):CD001878 - PubMed
  67. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 - PubMed
  68. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(3):403-412 - PubMed
  69. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Nov;112(11):2075-83 - PubMed
  70. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1973 Aug;157(2):121-8 - PubMed
  71. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44428 - PubMed
  72. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Apr;1369(1):55-75 - PubMed
  73. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jan;120(1):80-4 - PubMed
  74. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010 Jan;7(1):67-97 - PubMed
  75. Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 17;10(1):266 - PubMed
  76. Brain Cogn. 2018 Dec;128:80-88 - PubMed
  77. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1999 Jan-Mar;34(1):43-53 - PubMed
  78. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2000 Aug;25(6):535-49 - PubMed
  79. Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53 - PubMed
  80. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):488-501 - PubMed
  81. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Oct;9(4):480-94 - PubMed
  82. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1991 Jan;27(1):1-6 - PubMed
  83. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:523 - PubMed
  84. J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Oct 15;219(2):297-311 - PubMed
  85. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Jun;26(1-3):31-49 - PubMed
  86. J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 20;26(51):13338-43 - PubMed
  87. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010 Jun 17;4:19 - PubMed
  88. Learn Mem. 2015 Aug 18;22(9):411-6 - PubMed
  89. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 01;7:1671 - PubMed
  90. Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov - Dec;12(6):1349-1366 - PubMed
  91. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 30;101(13):4637-42 - PubMed
  92. J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jul;39(3):167-75 - PubMed
  93. J Psychiatr Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):443-55 - PubMed
  94. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Sep;15(3):421-4 - PubMed
  95. Neuroscientist. 2010 Jun;16(3):285-307 - PubMed
  96. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 13;9:44 - PubMed
  97. Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):458-62 - PubMed
  98. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jan 15;2:5 - PubMed
  99. Trends Neurosci. 2014 Jun;37(6):304-14 - PubMed

Publication Types