Display options
Share it on

Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;10(2):320-324. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_259_19. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

Assessment of Healing Using Alvogyl and Platelet Rich Fibrin in Patients with Dry Socket - An Evaluative Study.

Annals of maxillofacial surgery

M P Keshini, Sahith Kumar Shetty, Shyam Sundar, S N Chandan, S Manjula

Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

PMID: 33708574 PMCID: PMC7944002 DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_259_19

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dry socket is one of the most common postoperative complications following the extraction of permanent teeth, which is characterized by pain and exposed bone. The usual protocol followed for its management is irrigation of the socket and packing of the socket with medicated gel or paste to provide relatively faster pain relief and allow normal wound healing. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of management of dry socket with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and intraalveolar alvogyl dressing, in terms of improvement in pain and socket epithelialization after the treatment.

METHODOLOGY: Thirty participants with established dry socket were randomly divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. The participants in Group A were treated with alvogyl and those in Group B were treated with PRF. Clinical parameters were assessed for both groups on the 1

RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in pain and the number of socket wall exposure in both the groups by the 3

DISCUSSION: The use of PRF in the present study yielded promising results in terms of both pain reduction and improved wound healing which was comparable to the conventional alvogyl dressing. It may be concluded that PRF is an effective modality for the management of dry socket.

Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery.

Keywords: Alvogyl; dry socket; platelet-rich fibrin

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Br Dent J. 1976 Dec 21;141(12):377-9 - PubMed
  2. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Mar;101(3):e56-60 - PubMed
  3. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970 Dec;28(6):773-83 - PubMed
  4. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:796102 - PubMed
  5. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;31(3):309-17 - PubMed
  6. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Sep;90(3):282-4 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Dent. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):508-513 - PubMed
  8. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984 Apr;22(2):115-22 - PubMed
  9. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):160-165 - PubMed
  10. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 May;58(5):531-7 - PubMed
  11. Dent Update. 1991 Jan-Feb;18(1):31-4 - PubMed
  12. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972 Mar;30(1):23-32 - PubMed
  13. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Summer;12(3):153-158 - PubMed
  14. Anesth Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;37(1):32-41 - PubMed
  15. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:249073 - PubMed
  16. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Mar;101(3):e45-50 - PubMed
  17. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Nov;41(11):706-10 - PubMed
  18. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):76-82 - PubMed
  19. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Feb;47(2):165-7 - PubMed

Publication Types