Display options
Share it on

Sports (Basel). 2021 Feb 11;9(2). doi: 10.3390/sports9020027.

Footwear Affects Conventional and Sumo Deadlift Performance.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)

Kevin A Valenzuela, Kellie A Walters, Elizabeth L Avila, Alexis S Camacho, Fany Alvarado, Hunter J Bennett

Affiliations

  1. Movement Science Lab, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA.
  2. Neuromechanics Lab, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.

PMID: 33670253 PMCID: PMC7918349 DOI: 10.3390/sports9020027

Abstract

Barefoot weightlifting has become a popular training modality in recent years due to anecdotal suggestions of improved performance. However, research to support these anecdotal claims is limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the differences between the conventional deadlift (CD) and the sumo deadlift (SD) in barefoot and shod conditions. On day one, one-repetition maximums (1 RM) were assessed for thirty subjects in both the CD and SD styles. At least 72 h later, subjects returned to perform five repetitions in four different conditions (barefoot and shod for both CD and SD) at 70% 1 RM. A 2 × 2 (footwear × lifting style) MANOVA was used to assess differences between peak vertical ground reaction force (VGRF), total mechanical work (WORK), barbell vertical displacement (DISP), peak vertical velocity (PV) and lift time (TIME) during the concentric phase. The CD displayed significant increases in VGRF, DISP, WORK, and TIME over the SD. The shod condition displayed increased WORK, DISP, and TIME compared to the barefoot condition. This study suggests that lifting barefoot does not improve performance as no differences in VGRF or PV were evident. The presence of a shoe does appear to increase the DISP and WORK required to complete the lift, suggesting an increased work load is present while wearing shoes.

Keywords: barefoot; resistance training; shoes; weight lifting

References

  1. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3011-3019 - PubMed
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jul;32(7):1265-75 - PubMed
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):150-161 - PubMed
  4. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229507 - PubMed
  5. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec;88:196-200 - PubMed
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 16;16(12): - PubMed
  7. J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Aug 01;18(3):448-453 - PubMed
  8. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Dec;29(12):3271-8 - PubMed
  9. Knee. 2011 Dec;18(6):407-11 - PubMed
  10. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jun;32(6):1525-1530 - PubMed
  11. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S70-S77 - PubMed
  12. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Apr;34(4):682-8 - PubMed
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1177-82 - PubMed
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1345-53 - PubMed
  15. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jul;25(7):2000-9 - PubMed
  16. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Dec;33(12):3213-3219 - PubMed

Publication Types