BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e050223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050223.
Beyond PPE: a mixed qualitative-quantitative study capturing the wider issues affecting doctors' well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMJ open
Lyndsey Jayne Cubitt, Yu Ri Im, Ciaran James Scott, Louise Claire Jeynes, Paul David Molyneux
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Dept of Anaesthetics, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury Saint Edmunds, UK.
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
- Dept of Medicine, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury Saint Edmunds, UK.
- Neurology, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury Saint Edmunds, UK [email protected].
- Department of Neurology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
PMID: 33753449
PMCID: PMC7985981 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050223
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to the medical workforce. This has put them at increased risk of burnout at a time when levels are already worryingly high in the profession, with recent studies consistently showing that around half of doctors meet the validated criteria for burnout.
OBJECTIVES: To understand the wider factors influencing and impacting upon hospital doctors' well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey and mixed quantitative-qualitative analysis.
SETTING: Acute National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust in England.
PARTICIPANTS: An online survey was circulated in early June 2020 to all 449 doctors employed by the Trust. 242 doctors completed the survey (54% response rate).
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Questions assessed occupational details, self-reported changes in physical and mental health, satisfaction with working hours and patterns, availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), medication and facilities, communication and sought to identify areas seen as having a significant effect on doctors' well-being.
RESULTS: 96% of respondents requiring PPE were able to access it. Nearly half of the respondents felt that their mental health had deteriorated since the start of the pandemic. Over a third stated that their physical health had also declined. Issues identified as having a negative impact on doctors included increased workload, redeployment, loss of autonomy, personal issues affecting family members, anxiety around recovery plans, inadequate access to changing and storage facilities and to rest areas that allow for social distancing. Doctors appreciated access to 'calm rooms' that were made available for staff, access to clinical psychology support, free drinks and free car parking on site.
CONCLUSION: The emerging themes are suggestive of increased burnout risk among doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic and encompass factors well beyond shortage of PPE. Small organisational initiatives and the implementation of changes suggested by survey respondents can have a positive impact on doctors' well-being.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Keywords: COVID-19; mental health; occupational & industrial medicine
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: LJC, YRI, CJS, LCJ and PDM were employed by the Trust at the time the survey was undertaken and declare no further competing interests.
References
- BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 31;10(7):e039832 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):e031765 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2020 Mar 31;368:m1316 - PubMed
- Open Med (Wars). 2018 Jul 04;13:253-263 - PubMed
- J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2019 Feb 21;364:l848 - PubMed
- Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1684 - PubMed
- JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):195-205 - PubMed
- J Health Hum Serv Adm. 1999 Spring;21(4):472-89 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512 - PubMed
- Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):129-146 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):463-71 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2020 Mar 24;368:m1150 - PubMed
- BMC Med. 2004 Aug 18;2:29 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1022 - PubMed
- J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):1781-1790.e3 - PubMed
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e60-e65 - PubMed
- Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13 - PubMed
- Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:901-907 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m2055 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25;382(26):2485-2487 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e030968 - PubMed
- CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(5):603-607 - PubMed
- Pain Physician. 2020 Aug;23(4S):S271-S282 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1714-21 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e018720 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2020 Apr 17;369:m1562 - PubMed
- Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):443-51 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2019 May 15;9(5):e027362 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 5;9(9):e030209 - PubMed
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3043-53 - PubMed
- Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(4):252-254 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):952-60 - PubMed
- Ger Med Sci. 2020 Jun 22;18:Doc05 - PubMed
- Med Hypotheses. 2020 Nov;144:109972 - PubMed
- BJPsych Bull. 2017 Aug;41(4):197-204 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2020 Apr 6;369:m1379 - PubMed
- Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Jul;24(14):7869-7879 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0237301 - PubMed
- Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Aug 8;10(1):110 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types