Cite
Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Calon TGA, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Front Neurol. 2021;12:632987doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987.
Strijbos, R. M., Straatman, L. V., Calon, T. G. A., Johansson, M. L., de Bruijn, A. J. G., van den Berge, H., Wagenaar, M., Eichhorn, E., Janssen, M., Jonhede, S., van Tongeren, J., Holmberg, M., & Stokroos, R. (2021). Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Frontiers in neurology, 12632987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.632987
Strijbos, Ruben M, et al. "Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices." Frontiers in neurology vol. 12 (2021): 632987. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.632987
Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichhorn E, Janssen M, Jonhede S, van Tongeren J, Holmberg M, Stokroos R. Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:632987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987. eCollection 2021. PMID: 33716934; PMCID: PMC7945693.
Copy
Download .nbib