Display options
Share it on

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;97(4):623-624. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29568.

FFR.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

Arnold H Seto, Morton J Kern

Affiliations

  1. VA Long Beach Healthcare System, University of California Irvine, Long Beach, California, USA.

PMID: 33721411 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29568

[No abstract available.]

References

  1. Agasthi P, Kanmanthareddy A, Khalil C, et al. Comparison of computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve to invasive fractional flow reserve in diagnosis of functional coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11535. - PubMed
  2. Agarwal SK, Kasula S, Hacioglu Y, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF, Hakeem A. Utilizing post-intervention fractional flow reserve to optimize acute results and the relationship to long-term outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(10):1022-1031. - PubMed
  3. Bom MJ, Schumacher SP, Driessen RS, et al. Non-invasive procedural planning using computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:614-622. - PubMed
  4. Kim KH, Doh JH, Koo BK, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):72-78. - PubMed
  5. Kikuta Y, Cook CM, Sharp ASP, et al. Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback predicts hemodynamic outcome in humans with coronary artery disease: primary results of the international multicenter iFR GRADIENT registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(8):757-767. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types