Display options
Cite
Mills DA, Bernstein J. A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(7):1259-1266doi: 10.1002/jdd.12582.
Mills, D. A., & Bernstein, J. (2021). A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers. Journal of dental education, 85(7), 1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12582
Mills, Denise A, and Bernstein, Joshua. "A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers." Journal of dental education vol. 85,7 (2021): 1259-1266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12582
Mills DA, Bernstein J. A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers. J Dent Educ. 2021 Jul;85(7):1259-1266. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12582. Epub 2021 Mar 08. PMID: 33682132.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Dent Educ. 2021 Jul;85(7):1259-1266. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12582. Epub 2021 Mar 08.

A community of practice in dental education: A phenomenon of newcomers becoming oldtimers.

Journal of dental education

Denise A Mills, Joshua Bernstein

Affiliations

  1. Midwestern University College of Dental Medicine-Arizona, Glendale, Arizona, USA.
  2. A.T. Still University College of Health Sciences, Kriksville, Missouri, USA.

PMID: 33682132 DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12582

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Community of practice (CoP) members develop cooperative learning history with shared cases, techniques, and concepts. A 2020 study was designed to explore participants' perceptions toward learning in the dental education CoP.

METHODS: The Institutional Review Board exempted (AZ #1355) study involved an incidental population of third- and fourth-year dental students (N = 285) and resulted in a 43.5% response rate. The online Community of Practice Assessment Scale, consisted of Likert-style, check box items, and one open-ended question. Survey responses were categorized as Strongly Agree (1), Agree (2), No opinion (3), Disagree (4), and Strongly Disagree (5). Univariate analyses and descriptive statistics were used to analyze study variables (domain, community, and practice).

RESULTS: Overall the learning domain is most strongly perceived by participants with mean scores ranging from 1.59 to 1.61. Responses assessing practices within the CoP had mean scores ranging from 1.72 to 1.90. Similarly, responses assessing the community ranged from 1.65 to 1.81. "Builds Knowledge and Shared Learning" was the characteristic participants most strongly agreed as beneficial with a 1.58 mean score. Participants agree that the CoP "Captures and Stores Tacit and Explicit Knowledge" with a mean score of 1.90. There was a 25.6% response rate to the open-ended question. Two themes evolved: the need for calibration and more shared learning.

CONCLUSION: Based on study results, participants strongly agreed or agreed in opinions about CoP learning resources (faculty, staff, technology, and other students) benefitting their learning. The CoP provides an optimal environment for preparing competent new dental professionals.

© 2021 American Dental Education Association.

Keywords: dental students; mentors; observational learning; shared learning; social learning

References

  1. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991. - PubMed
  2. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripherial Participation. New York, NY: Cambride University Press; 1991. - PubMed
  3. Kaufman D, Mann K. Teaching and learning in medical education: how theroy can inform practice. In: Swanick T, Forrest K, O'Brien B, eds. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 2014:17-39. - PubMed
  4. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Printice-Hall; 1977. - PubMed
  5. Jakovljevic M, Buckley S, Bushney M. Forming communities of practice in higher education. In: Management, Knowledge, and Learning Conference, Croatia; 2013:1107-1119. - PubMed
  6. Wenger E. Communities of practice: a brief introduction. 2011. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/84d6/e4deccf799fbc18c6a2b7a86911e62cbe78d.pdf?_ga=2.221929759.606783724.1599189282-717730445.1588976339. Accessed September 2, 2020. - PubMed
  7. Cole JD, Ruble MJ, Donnelly J, Groves B. Peer assisted learning: clinical skill training for pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(6):644-648. - PubMed
  8. MacDougall M, Riley SC. Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: what do supervisors recommend? BMC Med Educ. 2012;10:1-11. - PubMed
  9. Commission on Dental Accreditation. Accreditation standards for dental education programs. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2019. https://www.ada.org/en/coda/current-accreditation-standards. Accessed September 2, 2020. - PubMed
  10. Serrat O. Surveying communities of practice. In: Serrat O, ed. Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance. Singapore: Springer; 2017:746-763. - PubMed
  11. Ary D, Chester Jacobs L, Sorensen C, Walker D. Introduction to Research in Education. 10th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning Inc.; 2019. - PubMed
  12. Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process providing translation research informatic support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381. - PubMed
  13. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Office 2020. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/microsoft-office. Accessed September 2, 2020. - PubMed
  14. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS. Statistics for Mac, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2020. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/downloading-ibm-spss-statistics-26. Accessed September 2, 2020. - PubMed
  15. Linehan C, McCarthy J. Position in practice: understanding participation in the social world. J Theory Soc Behav. 2000;30(4):435-453. - PubMed
  16. O'Connor A, Cahill M, McKay EA. Revisiting 1:1 and 2:1 clinical placement model: student and clinical educator perspectives. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59(4):276-283. - PubMed
  17. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978. - PubMed
  18. Hodge P, Wright S, Mozeley F. More-than-human theorizing-inclusive communities of practice in student practice-based learning. In: Huisman J, Tight M, eds. Theory and Method in Higher Education Research II. Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014:83-102. - PubMed
  19. Hägg-Martinell A, Hult H, Hendriksson P, Kiessling A. A community of practice and student interaction at an acute medical ward: an ethnographic study. Med Teach. 2015;38(8):793-800. - PubMed
  20. Nishioka VM, Coe MT, Hanita M, Moscato SR. Dedicated education unit student perspectives. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014;35(5):301-307. - PubMed
  21. Ranse K, Grealish L. Nursing students’ perceptions of learning in the clinical setting of the Dedicated Education Unit. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(2):301-307. - PubMed
  22. Mohan M, Ravindran TKS. Conceptual framework explaining “preparedness for practice” of dental graduates: a systematic review. J Dent Educ. 2016;82(11):1194-1202. - PubMed
  23. Burgess J, Sawchenko L. Community of practice: a nurse practitioner collaborative model. Nurs Leadersh. 2011;24(2):99-112. - PubMed
  24. Fredholm A, Manninen K, Hjelmqvist H, Silén C. Authenticity made visible in medical students’ experiences of feeling like a doctor. Int J Med Educ. 2019;10:113-121. - PubMed
  25. Mayne W, Andrew N, Drury C, et al. ‘There's more unites us than divides us!’ A further and higher education community of practice in nursing. J Furth High Educ. 2013;39(2):163-170. - PubMed
  26. Sayer L. Communities of practice, a phenomenon to explain student development in community nursing. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014;15(4):430-440. - PubMed
  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-2019), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html. Accessed September 2, 2020. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types