Display options
Share it on

J Neurol. 2021 Oct;268(10):3808-3816. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10530-9. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

MRI correlates of cognitive improvement after home-based EEG neurofeedback training in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

Journal of neurology

Daniela Pinter, Silvia Erika Kober, Viktoria Fruhwirth, Lisa Berger, Anna Damulina, Michael Khalil, Christa Neuper, Guilherme Wood, Christian Enzinger

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, Graz, Austria. [email protected].
  2. Research Unit for Neuronal Plasticity and Repair, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. [email protected].
  3. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria. [email protected].
  4. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
  5. Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  6. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, Graz, Austria.
  7. Research Unit for Neuronal Plasticity and Repair, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  8. Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
  9. Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

PMID: 33786666 PMCID: PMC8463344 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10530-9

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neurofeedback training may improve cognitive function in patients with neurological disorders. However, the underlying cerebral mechanisms of such improvements are poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to investigate MRI correlates of cognitive improvement after EEG-based neurofeedback training in patients with MS (pwMS).

METHODS: Fourteen pwMS underwent ten neurofeedback training sessions within 3-4 weeks at home using a tele-rehabilitation system. Half of the pwMS (N = 7, responders) learned to self-regulate sensorimotor rhythm (SMR, 12-15 Hz) by visual feedback and improved cognitively after training, whereas the remainder (non-responders, n = 7) did not. Diffusion-tensor imaging and resting-state fMRI of the brain was performed before and after training. We analyzed fractional anisotropy (FA) and functional connectivity (FC) of the default-mode, sensorimotor (SMN) and salience network (SAL).

RESULTS: At baseline, responders and non-responders were comparable regarding sex, age, education, disease duration, physical and cognitive impairment, and MRI parameters. After training, compared to non-responders, responders showed increased FA and FC within the SAL and SMN. Cognitive improvement correlated with increased FC in SAL and a correlation trend with increased FA was observed.

CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests that successful neurofeedback training may not only lead to cognitive improvement, but also to increases in brain microstructure and functional connectivity.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Keywords: Cognitive training; DTI; Multiple sclerosis; Neurofeedback; Resting-state fMRI

References

  1. Benedict R, DeLuca J, Enzinger C et al (2017) Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: looking back and moving forward. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 23:832–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717000959 - PubMed
  2. Sumowski JF, Benedict R, Enzinger C et al (2018) Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977 - PubMed
  3. das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, Lincoln NB (2016) Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002293 (pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com) - PubMed
  4. Rosti-Otajärvi EM, Hämäläinen PI (2014) Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009131.pub3 - PubMed
  5. Mitolo M, Venneri A, Wilkinson ID, Sharrack B (2015) Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci 354:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.004 - PubMed
  6. Sandroff BM, DeLuca J (2019) Will behavioral treatments for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis become standards-of-care? Int J Psychophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.02.010 - PubMed
  7. Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti ND, O’Brien AR, DeLuca J (2018) Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: an updated review of the literature from 2007 to 2016. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:390–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.021 - PubMed
  8. Keune PM, Hansen S, Sauder T et al (2019) Frontal brain activity and cognitive processing speed in multiple sclerosis: an exploration of EEG neurofeedback training. NeuroImage Clin 22:101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101716 - PubMed
  9. Charvet LE, Yang J, Shaw MT et al (2017) Cognitive function in multiple sclerosis improves with telerehabilitation: results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177177 - PubMed
  10. Gruzelier JH (2014) EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: a review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 44:124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.015 - PubMed
  11. Choobforoushzadeh A, Neshat-Doost HT, Molavi H, Abedi MR (2015) Effect of neurofeedback training on depression and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 40:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-014-9267-4 - PubMed
  12. Kober SE, Pinter D, Enzinger C et al (2019) Self-regulation of brain activity and its effect on cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis—first insights from an interventional study using neurofeedback. Clin Neurophysiol 130:2124–2131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.025 - PubMed
  13. Hoedlmoser K, Pecherstorfer T, Gruber G et al (2008) Instrumental conditioning of human sensorimotor rhythm (12–15 Hz) and its impact on sleep as well as declarative learning. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep/31.10.1401 - PubMed
  14. Kober SE, Schweiger D, Witte M et al (2015) Specific effects of EEG based neurofeedback training on memory functions in post-stroke victims. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0105-6 - PubMed
  15. Tan G, Thornby J, Hammond DC et al (2009) Meta-analysis of EEG biofeedback in treating epilepsy. Clin EEG Neurosci 40:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940904000310 - PubMed
  16. Sterman MB (2000) Basic concepts and clinical findings in the treatment of seizure disorders with EEG operant conditioning. Clin Electroencephalogr 31:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940003100111 - PubMed
  17. Kober SE, Witte M, Stangl M et al (2015) Shutting down sensorimotor interference unblocks the networks for stimulus processing: an SMR neurofeedback training study. Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.03.031 - PubMed
  18. Wei W, Wang X-J (2017) Inhibitory control in the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical ciruit: complex modulation and its interplay with working memory and decision making. Neuron 92:1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040 - PubMed
  19. Rao S (1990) A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee - PubMed
  20. Plummer DL (1992) DispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images. Rev Neuroradiol 5:489–495 - PubMed
  21. Pruim RHR, Mennes M, van Rooij D et al (2015) ICA-AROMA: a robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data. Neuroimage 112:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.064 - PubMed
  22. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL et al (2009) Correspondence of the brain’ s functional architecture during activation and rest. PNAS 106:13040–13045 - PubMed
  23. Nickerson LD, Smith SM, Öngür D, Beckmann CF (2017) Using dual regression to investigate network shape and amplitude in functional connectivity analyses. Front Neurosci 11:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00115 - PubMed
  24. Davelaar EJ (2018) Mechanisms of neurofeedback: a computation-theoretic approach. Neuroscience 378:175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.052 - PubMed
  25. Ros T, Baars BJ, Lanius RA, Vuilleumier P (2014) Tuning pathological brain oscillations with neurofeedback : a systems neuroscience framework. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01008 - PubMed
  26. Marins T, Rodrigues EC, Bortolini T et al (2019) Structural and functional connectivity changes in response to short-term neurofeedback training with motor imagery. Neuroimage 194:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.027 - PubMed
  27. Munivenkatappa A, Rajeswaran J, Indira Devi B et al (2014) EEG Neurofeedback therapy: can it attenuate brain changes in TBI? NeuroRehabilitation 35:481–484. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-141140 - PubMed
  28. Ghaziri J, Tucholka A, Larue V et al (2013) Neurofeedback training induces changes in white and gray matter. Clin EEG Neurosci 44:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059413476031 - PubMed
  29. Emmert K, Kopel R, Sulzer J et al (2016) NeuroImage Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: how is brain regulation mediated ? Neuroimage 124:806–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.042 - PubMed
  30. Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L et al (2016) Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.164 - PubMed
  31. Peters SK, Dunlop K, Downar J (2016) Cortico-striatal-thalamic loop circuits of the salience network: a central pathway in psychiatric disease and treatment. Front Syst Neurosci 10:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00104 - PubMed
  32. Micoulaud-Franchi JA, McGonigal A, Lopez R et al (2015) Electroencephalographic neurofeedback: level of evidence in mental and brain disorders and suggestions for good clinical practice. Neurophysiol Clin 45:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2015.10.077 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types