Display options
Share it on

Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2021 Jan 13;29(1):70-76. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.19810. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Evaluation of functions after surgical treatment in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome using QuickDASH.

Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi

Selçuk Köse, Servet Özdemir

Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Health Sciences University, Bak?rköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

PMID: 33768983 PMCID: PMC7970072 DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.19810

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

METHODS: A total of 106 patients (15 males, 91 females; mean age: 30.7±10.2 years; range, 13 to 60 years) with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome were included in this prospective study between January 2015 and December 2018. The questionnaire was administered to all patients before and six months after surgery. The patients were operated using a transaxillary or supraclavicular approach under general anesthesia.

RESULTS: The Cronbach"s alpha value of the questionnaire was found to be 0.85 and the scale consisted of two factors. The change in both the functional status subscale scores (p<0.001) and the physical pain subscale scores (p<0.001) were statistically significantly different before and after surgery. At the end of six months, 53% of the patients with at least one mild difficulty continued to have complaints related to hand, arm and shoulder.

CONCLUSION: Based on our study results, this questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for measuring and monitoring disease symptoms in patients with arterial thoracic outlet syndrome.

Copyright © 2021, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Keywords: Arterial; QuickDASH questionnaire; reliability; thoracic outlet syndrome; validity

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Mar;64(3):285-90 - PubMed
  2. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;40:303-326 - PubMed
  3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44 - PubMed
  4. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018 Jan 12;8(1): - PubMed
  5. Pain Ther. 2019 Jun;8(1):5-18 - PubMed
  6. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;46(3):601-4 - PubMed
  7. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 Sep;18(5):558-65 - PubMed
  8. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Jul;42(5):521-30 - PubMed
  9. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):241-245 - PubMed
  10. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 May 18;17(5): - PubMed
  11. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):630-5; discussion 635-7 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Jan;35(1):79-83 - PubMed

Publication Types