Display options
Share it on

Scars Burn Heal. 2021 Mar 16;7:2059513120988532. doi: 10.1177/2059513120988532. eCollection 2021.

Electrochemical treatment of ex vivo human abdominal skin and potential use in scar management: A pilot study.

Scars, burns & healing

Dana M Hutchison, Amir A Hakimi, Avin Wijayaweera, Soohong Seo, Ellen M Hong, Tiffany T Pham, Melissa Bircan, Ryan Sivoraphonh, Brandyn Dunn, Mark R Kobayashi, Sehwan Kim, Brian Jf Wong

Affiliations

  1. Beckman Laser Institute & Medical Clinic, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
  2. Department of Dermatology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  3. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California - Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  4. Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California - Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
  5. Beckman Laser Institute Korea, School of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheoan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea.
  6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

PMID: 33796338 PMCID: PMC7970177 DOI: 10.1177/2059513120988532

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scar treatments aim to address pathologic collagen deposition; however, they can be expensive or difficult to control. Electrochemical therapy (ECT) offers a simple alternative treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine the acid-base and histological changes in ex vivo human abdominal skin following ECT.

METHODS: Forty-two ex vivo human panniculus tissue sections collected from six individuals were tumesced with normal saline. ECT was performed by inserting two platinum needle electrodes connected to a DC power supply into each specimen. Voltage was varied (3-6 V) and applied for 5 minutes. Each specimen was sectioned across both electrode insertion sites and immediately stained with pH sensitive dye. The width of dye color change for each dosimetry pair was calculated. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to evaluate samples.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: ECT caused a spatially localised and dose-dependent increased area of acidic and basic pH around the anode and cathode, respectively. A significantly greater mean width of pH change was generated at the cathode compared to the anode in all treatment groups. Histological evaluation displayed broad condensation and hyalinisation of dermal collagen.

CONCLUSION: ECT triggered dermal pH alterations and changed the underlying structural framework of the specimen. This technology may serve as a low-cost, minimally invasive local soft-tissue remodeling technique with potential application in scar management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

LAY SUMMARY: Electrochemical therapy is a novel treatment that causes spatially selective dermal injury in areas of interest. This study measures the effects of electrochemical therapy when applied to abdominal skin. Electrochemical therapy appears to have beneficial effects by causing a highly localised reduction in collagen content or local softening of tissue, which is consistent with other studies on scar therapies, including chemexfoliation, radiofrequency technologies, and lasers. However, electrochemical therapy can be performed at a fraction of the costs of these aforementioned modalities.

© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords: Electrochemical therapy; collagen; in situ drug therapy; skin

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;28(5):518-24 - PubMed
  2. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;38(11):3389-97 - PubMed
  3. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Mar/Apr;22(2):86-92 - PubMed
  4. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995 Mar;32(3):472-8 - PubMed
  5. J Dermatol Sci. 2008 Dec;52(3):205-9 - PubMed
  6. Eur Surg Res. 2017;58(1-2):81-94 - PubMed
  7. Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Mar;52(3):196-206 - PubMed
  8. Burns. 2017 Nov;43(7):1379-1389 - PubMed
  9. J Dermatol Sci. 2018 Dec;92(3):281-283 - PubMed
  10. JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):69-73 - PubMed
  11. J Dermatol Sci. 2018 Jun;90(3):232-240 - PubMed
  12. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jan;19(1):190-198 - PubMed
  13. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Feb 21;:1-7 - PubMed
  14. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 Mar;34(3):455-64 - PubMed
  15. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Dec 1;19(6):502-509 - PubMed
  16. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Feb 1;7(2):29-45 - PubMed
  17. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016 Jun;6(2):169-83 - PubMed
  18. Arch Surg. 1994 Jan;129(1):107-11 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Med Res. 2017 Aug 14;22(1):28 - PubMed
  20. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jan 29;7(2):298-299 - PubMed
  21. Laryngoscope. 2011 Sep;121(9):1839-42 - PubMed
  22. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(4):245-72 - PubMed
  23. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38 - PubMed
  24. Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):E405-10 - PubMed
  25. Laryngoscope. 2015 Sep;125(9):2058-66 - PubMed
  26. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Sep;61(9):1049-58 - PubMed
  27. J Dermatol Sci. 2020 Mar;97(3):179-186 - PubMed

Publication Types