Display options
Share it on

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 27;5(4):e24760. doi: 10.2196/24760.

Psychological and Coping Strategies Related to Home Isolation and Social Distancing in Children and Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.

JMIR formative research

Abduljaleel Abdullatif Zainel, Hamda Qotba, Alyaa Al-Maadeed, Sadriya Al-Kohji, Hanan Al Mujalli, Atif Ali, Lolwa Al Mannai, Aisha Aladab, Hamda AlSaadi, Khalid Ali AlKarbi, Tholfakhar Al-Baghdadi

Affiliations

  1. Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  2. Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

PMID: 33851577 PMCID: PMC8083952 DOI: 10.2196/24760

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 was identified as the cause of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. It rapidly spread due to human-to-human transmission, resulting in a global pandemic. Nearly every country, including Qatar, has established guidelines and regulations to limit the spread of the virus and to preserve public health. However, these procedures have been associated with negative effects on the psychological and intellectual well-being of individuals, including children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the psychological influence of home isolation and social distancing on children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar, and the strategies used to cope with these measures.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study was undertaken using an online questionnaire administered through SMS text messaging. All home-isolated children and adolescents registered at the Primary Health Care Corporation aged 7-18 years were invited to participate in the study. Children and adolescents with intellectual disadvantages were excluded. A P value of .05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: Data were collected from 6608 participants from June 23 to July 18, 2020. Nearly all participants adhered to the official regulations during the period of home isolation and social distancing; however, 69.1% (n=4568) of parents believed their children were vulnerable to the virus compared to 25% (n=1652) who expressed they were not vulnerable at all. Higher levels of anger, depression, and general anxiety were prevalent among 1.3% (n=84), 3.9% (n=260), and 1.6% (n=104) of participants, respectively. The mean score for the emotional constructs anger and depression decreased with increased compliance with regulations (P=.04 and P=.11, respectively). The differences in mean score for all psychological and coping strategies used among participants across the 3 levels of vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 were statistically significant. The mean score varied little with increasing reported vulnerability to the virus. This mild variation can make a difference when the sample size is large, as is the case in this study.

CONCLUSIONS: Screening for psychological and social disruptions is important for the development of strategies by schools and health care providers to assess and monitor behavioral changes and negative psychological impact during post-COVID-19 reintegration. Participants experiencing higher levels of anxiety should be given more attention during reintegration and transitional phases in schools. Although electronic devices and social media platforms may have lowered anxiety levels in some cases, it is important to address how they are used and how content is tailored to children and adolescents. It is also important to maintain an active lifestyle for children and young persons, and encourage them not to neglect their physical health, as this promotes a better psychological state of mind.

©Abduljaleel Abdullatif Zainel, Hamda Qotba, Alyaa Al-Maadeed, Sadriya Al-Kohji, Hanan Al Mujalli, Atif Ali, Lolwa Al Mannai, Aisha Aladab, Hamda AlSaadi, Khalid Ali AlKarbi, Tholfakhar Al-Baghdadi. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 27.04.2021.

Keywords: COVID-19; Qatar; adolescents; children; coping strategies; coronavirus; pandemic; psychological

References

  1. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2020 May 12;14:20 - PubMed
  2. J Pers. 1996 Mar;64(1):71-105 - PubMed
  3. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Jul;31(5):449-453 - PubMed
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:38-45 - PubMed
  5. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):166-85 - PubMed
  6. Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6): - PubMed
  7. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Feb;7(1):105-10 - PubMed
  8. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2003 Fall;13(3):337-49 - PubMed
  9. Couns Psychother Res. 2020 Jun 03;: - PubMed
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5): - PubMed
  11. Fam Process. 2003 Spring;42(1):1-18 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920 - PubMed
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:119-44 - PubMed
  14. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Jul;136(7):997-1007 - PubMed
  15. J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Nov;39(11):1330-42 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):87-127 - PubMed
  17. J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:264-266.e1 - PubMed
  18. Psychol Bull. 2003 Mar;129(2):216-269 - PubMed
  19. Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):331-335 - PubMed
  20. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;59(11):1218-1239.e3 - PubMed
  21. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;53(1):15-23 - PubMed
  22. J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;205:298-299.e1 - PubMed
  23. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(4):265-72 - PubMed
  24. J Affect Disord. 2020 Oct 1;275:112-118 - PubMed
  25. J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1457-9 - PubMed
  26. Can J Psychiatry. 2011 May;56(5):258-65 - PubMed
  27. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jul 26;14(1):100 - PubMed
  28. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;10(7):1206-12 - PubMed
  29. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Sep;26(5):626-53 - PubMed
  30. Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):945-947 - PubMed

Publication Types