Display options
Share it on

J Intell. 2021 Mar 16;9(1). doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9010016.

Advancing the Understanding of the Factor Structure of Executive Functioning.

Journal of Intelligence

Samsad Afrin Himi, Markus Bühner, Sven Hilbert

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Jagannath University, Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh.
  2. Psychological Methods and Assessment, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.
  3. Educational Science and Sport Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

PMID: 33809636 PMCID: PMC8006229 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence9010016

Abstract

There has been considerable debate and interest regarding the factor structure of executive functioning (EF). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to delve into this issue differently, by investigating EF and other cognitive constructs, such as working memory capacity (WMC), relational integration, and divided attention, which may contribute to EF. Here, we examined whether it is possible to provide evidence for a definite model of EF containing the components of updating, shifting, and inhibition. For this purpose, 202 young adults completed a battery of EF, three WMC tests, three relational integration tests, and two divided attention tests. A confirmatory factor analysis on all the cognitive abilities produced a five-factor structure, which included one factor predominately containing shifting tasks, the next factor containing two updating tasks, the third one predominately representing WMC, the fourth factor consisting of relational integration and antisaccade tasks, and finally, the last factor consisting of the divided attention and stop signal tasks. Lastly, a subsequent hierarchical model supported a higher-order factor, thereby representing general cognitive ability.

Keywords: divided attention; executive functioning; factor structure; relational integration; task impurity; working memory capacity

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 26;6:328 - PubMed
  2. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):32-48 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:246-258 - PubMed
  4. Neuropsychology. 2006 Sep;20(5):607-13 - PubMed
  5. Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:275-298 - PubMed
  6. Child Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;77(6):1822-41 - PubMed
  7. J Pers. 2016 Jun;84(3):348-60 - PubMed
  8. Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):326-40 - PubMed
  9. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 - PubMed
  10. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 - PubMed
  11. Neuropsychology. 2004 Apr;18(2):296-305 - PubMed
  12. Cogn Process. 2017 Feb;18(1):13-29 - PubMed
  13. Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1343-1355 - PubMed
  14. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):451-66 - PubMed
  15. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1509-15 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Apr;105(4):286-305 - PubMed
  17. Neuroimage. 2003 Mar;18(3):789-97 - PubMed
  18. Brain Cogn. 2012 Apr;78(3):284-99 - PubMed
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Feb;108(2):187-218 - PubMed
  20. Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Dec;21(6):803-31; discussion 831-64 - PubMed
  21. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):595-619 - PubMed
  22. Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):222-243 - PubMed
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):336-58 - PubMed

Publication Types