J Intell. 2021 Mar 16;9(1). doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9010016.
Advancing the Understanding of the Factor Structure of Executive Functioning.
Journal of Intelligence
Samsad Afrin Himi, Markus Bühner, Sven Hilbert
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, Jagannath University, Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh.
- Psychological Methods and Assessment, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802 Munich, Germany.
- Educational Science and Sport Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
PMID: 33809636
PMCID: PMC8006229 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence9010016
Abstract
There has been considerable debate and interest regarding the factor structure of executive functioning (EF). Therefore, the aim of the current study was to delve into this issue differently, by investigating EF and other cognitive constructs, such as working memory capacity (WMC), relational integration, and divided attention, which may contribute to EF. Here, we examined whether it is possible to provide evidence for a definite model of EF containing the components of updating, shifting, and inhibition. For this purpose, 202 young adults completed a battery of EF, three WMC tests, three relational integration tests, and two divided attention tests. A confirmatory factor analysis on all the cognitive abilities produced a five-factor structure, which included one factor predominately containing shifting tasks, the next factor containing two updating tasks, the third one predominately representing WMC, the fourth factor consisting of relational integration and antisaccade tasks, and finally, the last factor consisting of the divided attention and stop signal tasks. Lastly, a subsequent hierarchical model supported a higher-order factor, thereby representing general cognitive ability.
Keywords: divided attention; executive functioning; factor structure; relational integration; task impurity; working memory capacity
References
- Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 26;6:328 - PubMed
- Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):32-48 - PubMed
- J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Mar;167:246-258 - PubMed
- Neuropsychology. 2006 Sep;20(5):607-13 - PubMed
- Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:275-298 - PubMed
- Child Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;77(6):1822-41 - PubMed
- J Pers. 2016 Jun;84(3):348-60 - PubMed
- Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):326-40 - PubMed
- Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 - PubMed
- Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 - PubMed
- Neuropsychology. 2004 Apr;18(2):296-305 - PubMed
- Cogn Process. 2017 Feb;18(1):13-29 - PubMed
- Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1343-1355 - PubMed
- J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):451-66 - PubMed
- Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1509-15 - PubMed
- J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Apr;105(4):286-305 - PubMed
- Neuroimage. 2003 Mar;18(3):789-97 - PubMed
- Brain Cogn. 2012 Apr;78(3):284-99 - PubMed
- J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Feb;108(2):187-218 - PubMed
- Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Dec;21(6):803-31; discussion 831-64 - PubMed
- Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):595-619 - PubMed
- Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):222-243 - PubMed
- J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):336-58 - PubMed
Publication Types