Display options
Share it on

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 02;113(11):1551-1560. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab075.

Gender Differences in Treatment Allocation and Survival of Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis, Marianne C Kalff, Anna D Wagner, Rob H A Verhoeven, Valery E P P Lemmens, Martijn G H van Oijen, Suzanne S Gisbertz, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven

Affiliations

  1. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  2. Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  3. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  4. Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  5. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

PMID: 33837791 PMCID: PMC8562959 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab075

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological sex and gender have been reported to affect incidence and overall survival (OS) of curatively treated gastroesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare palliative treatment allocation and OS between women and men with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

METHODS: Patients with an unresectable or metastatic esophageal (including cardia) adenocarcinoma (EAC) or squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) diagnosed in 2015-2018 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatment allocation was compared using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and OS using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS: Of patients with EAC (n = 3077), ESCC (n = 794), and GAC (n = 1836), 18.0%, 39.4%, and 39.1% were women, respectively. Women less often received systemic treatment compared with men for EAC (42.7% vs 47.4%, P = .045) and GAC (33.8% vs 38.8%, P = .03) but not for ESCC (33.2% vs 39.5%, P = .07). Women had a lower probability of receiving systemic treatment for GAC in multivariable analyses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62 to 1.00) but not for EAC (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.06) and ESCC (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.14). Median OS was lower in women with EAC (4.4 vs 5.2 months, P = .04) but did not differ after adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics and systemic treatment administration.

CONCLUSIONS: We observed statistically significant and clinically relevant gender differences in systemic treatment administration and OS in advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Causes of these disparities may be sex based (ie, related to tumor biology) as well as gender based (eg, related to differences in treatment choices).

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

References

  1. Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1015-21 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2680-2683 - PubMed
  3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jan 1;111(1):34-41 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Nov;139:107-118 - PubMed
  5. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296 - PubMed
  6. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;69:101846 - PubMed
  7. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30 - PubMed
  8. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:40-47 - PubMed
  10. Oncotarget. 2017 Oct 7;8(56):95965-95972 - PubMed
  11. Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc11 - PubMed
  12. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 May;16(5):330-9 - PubMed
  13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4 - PubMed
  14. Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):303-310 - PubMed
  15. Int J Cancer. 2011 Jun 1;128(11):2717-25 - PubMed
  16. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011 Jun;2(2):77-84 - PubMed
  17. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;3(1):1-10 - PubMed
  18. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):1003-1006 - PubMed
  19. BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19 - PubMed
  20. Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):113-117 - PubMed
  21. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 7;18(5):393-400 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:23-31 - PubMed
  24. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4344-4351 - PubMed
  25. Br J Surg. 2016 Feb;103(3):233-41 - PubMed
  26. Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9 - PubMed
  27. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jun;16(6):e498-e506 - PubMed
  28. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 5;381(10):982-985 - PubMed
  29. Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):565-582 - PubMed
  30. Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(16):2397-403 - PubMed
  31. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Mar;19(3):417-23 - PubMed
  32. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 30;108(10): - PubMed
  33. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jan 1;112(1):12-29 - PubMed
  34. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):1-6.e1 - PubMed
  35. J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul/Oct;32(3-4):92-100 - PubMed
  36. J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1470-4 - PubMed
  37. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2265-72 - PubMed
  38. Ann Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;30(12):1914-1924 - PubMed
  39. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 Sep;11(7):653-66 - PubMed
  40. Oncologist. 2010;15(6):648-55 - PubMed

Publication Types