J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Apr 07.
More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk scores are available for risk adjustment: A systematic review.
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Hemalkumar B Mehta, Lin Wang, Ioannis Malagaris, Yanjun Duan, Lori Rosman, G Caleb Alexander
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
- Welch Medical Library, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
PMID: 33838274
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.029
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: While several prescription drug-based risk indices have been developed, their design, performance, and application has not previously been synthesized.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase from inception through March 3, 2020 and included studies that developed or updated a prescription drug-based risk index. Two reviewers independently performed screening and extracted information on data source, study population, cohort sizes, outcomes, study methodology and performance. Predictive performance was evaluated using C statistics for binary outcomes and R
RESULTS: Of 19,112 articles that were retrieved, 124 were full-text screened and 25 were included, each of which represented a de novo or updated drug-based index. The indices were customized to varied age groups and clinical populations and most commonly evaluated outcomes including mortality (36%), hospitalization (24%) and healthcare costs (24%). C statistics ranged from 0.62 to 0.92 for mortality and 0.59 to 0.72 for hospitalization, while adjusted R
CONCLUSIONS: More than two-dozen prescription drug-based risk indices have been developed and they differ significantly in design, performance and application.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Administrative healthcare data; Comorbidity scores; Pharmacy data; Prescription drugs; Risk index; Systematic review
Substances
MeSH terms
Publication Types