Display options
Share it on

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Apr 02; doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06544-5. Epub 2021 Apr 02.

The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA

Andreas B Imhoff, Eva Bartsch, Christoph Becher, Peter Behrens, Gerrit Bode, Matthias Cotic, Theresa Diermeier, Holger Falk, Matthias J Feucht, Ulrich Haupt, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Johannes Holz, René Hutter, René Kaiser, Tobias Knoblauch, Wolfgang Nebelung, Philipp Niemeyer, Turlough O'Donnel, Geert Pagenstert, Thilo Patzer, Tim Rose, Marco C Rupp, Thomas Tischer, Arne J Venjakob, Stephan Vogt, Jonas Pogorzelski

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. [email protected].
  2. Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  3. ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Bismarckstr. 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Orthodok, Tonndorfer Hauptstraße 71, 22045, Hamburg, Germany.
  5. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
  6. Gelenkzentrum Rhein-Main, Frankfurter Straße 94, 65239, Hochheim am Main, Germany.
  7. Orthomotion, City Clinic Thun, Marktgasse 17, 3600, Thun, Switzerland.
  8. OrthoPlus Munich, Alte Börse, Lenbachplatz 2a, 80333, Munich, Germany.
  9. Orthocentrum, Hansastr. 1-3, 20149, Hamburg, Germany.
  10. Department of Orthopedics, Kantonspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 99, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
  11. Gelenkzentrum Leipzig, Richard-Lehmann-Str. 21, 04275, Leipzig, Germany.
  12. Department of Sport Orthopedics, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Schloßstr. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  13. Center for Orthopaedics, Beacon Hospital, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Dublin, Ireland.
  14. Knee Institute Basel, CLARAHOF Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, MERIAN-ISELIN-Hospital, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Föhrenstr. 2, 4054, Basel, Switzerland.
  15. Orthopädie-Zentrum, Schön Klinik, Am Heerdter Krankenhaus 2, 40549, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  16. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Rostock, Doberanerstr. 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
  17. Department of Sports Orthopedics, Hessing Stiftung, Hessingstr. 17, 86199, Augsburg, Germany.

PMID: 33811265 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06544-5

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up following contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty (PFIA) and to identify potential risk factors for failure in a multi-center study.

METHODS: All patients who underwent implantation of PFIA between 09/2009 and 11/2016 at 11 specialized orthopedic referral centers were enrolled in the study and were evaluated retrospectively at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tegner Scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and subjective patient satisfaction. Pre- and perioperative risk factors were compared among failures and non-failures to determine potential risk factors.

RESULTS: A total of 263 patients (85% follow-up rate) could be enrolled. The mean age at the time of index surgery was 49 ± 12 years with a mean postoperative follow-up of 45 ± 18 months. The overall failure rate was 11% (28 patients), of which 18% (5 patients) were patients with patella resurfacing at index surgery and 82% (23 patients) were patients without initial patella resurfacing. At final follow-up, 93% of the patients who did not fail were satisfied with the procedure with a mean transformed WOMAC Score of 84.5 ± 14.5 points, a mean KOOS Score of 73.3 ± 17.1 points, a mean Tegner Score of 3.4 ± 1.4 points and a mean VAS pain of 2.4 ± 2.0 points. An increased BMI was significantly correlated with a worse postoperative outcome. Concomitant procedures addressing patellofemoral instability or malalignment, the lack of patellofemoral resurfacing at the index surgery and a high BMI were significantly correlated with failure in our patient cohort.

CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with good functional outcomes at short-term follow-up and thus can be considered a viable treatment option in young patients suffering from isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Patellar resurfacing at index surgery is recommended to decrease the risk of failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Keywords: Inlay; Knee; Patellofemoral; Patellofemoral arthroplasty; Patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Patellofemoral resurfacing; Retropatellar resurfacing; Trochlea; WAVE prosthesis

References

  1. Beckmann J, Merz C, Huth J, Rath B, Schnurr C, Thienpont E (2019) Patella alta and patellar subluxation might lead to early failure with inlay patello-femoral joint arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:685–691 - PubMed
  2. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840 - PubMed
  3. Bendixen NB, Eskelund PW, Odgaard A (2019) Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty-registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review. Acta Orthop 90:473–478 - PubMed
  4. Calliess T, Ettinger M, Schado S, Becher C, Hurschler C, Ostermeier S (2016) Patella tracking and patella contact pressure in modular patellofemoral arthroplasty: a biomechanical in vitro analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:849–855 - PubMed
  5. Chawla H, Nwachukwu BU, van der List JP, Eggman AA, Pearle AD, Ghomrawi HM (2017) Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral versus total knee arthroplasty in younger patients. Bone Jt J 99-b:1028–1036 - PubMed
  6. Clement ND, Howard TA, Immelman RJ, MacDonald D, Patton JT, Lawson GM et al (2019) Patellofemoralarthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: equal function and satisfaction but higher revision rate for partial arthroplasty at a minimum eight years’ follow-up. Bone Jt J 101-b:41–46 - PubMed
  7. Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:487–491 - PubMed
  8. Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2012) Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2174–2190 - PubMed
  9. Felson DT, Niu J, Gross KD, Englund M, Sharma L, Cooke TD et al (2013) Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: findings from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Rheum 65:355–362 - PubMed
  10. Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K, Baldini JF, Meidinger G, Schottle PB et al (2017) A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2784–2791 - PubMed
  11. Grassi A, Compagnoni R, Ferrua P, Zaffagnini S, Berruto M, Samuelsson K et al (2018) Patellar resurfacing versus patellar retention in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3206–3218 - PubMed
  12. Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Meidinger G, Schottle PB, Cotic M (2015) Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1299–1307 - PubMed
  13. Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J (2019) High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2251–2258 - PubMed
  14. Joseph MN, Carmont MR, Tailor H, Stephen JM, Amis AA (2020) Total knee arthroplasty reduces knee extension torque in-vitro and patellofemoralarthroplasty does not. J Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109739109739 - PubMed
  15. Kamikovski I, Dobransky J, Dervin GF (2019) The clinical outcome of patellofemoralarthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty 34:2914–2917 - PubMed
  16. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502 - PubMed
  17. Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR (2003) Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone JtSurg Br 85:836–840 - PubMed
  18. Laursen JO (2017) High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave - PubMed
  19. Laursen JO, Backer Mogensen C, Skjøt-Arkil H (2019) HemiCAP knee implants: mid- to long-term results. Cartilage. https://doi.org/10.1177/19476035198947321947603519894732 - PubMed
  20. Liow MH, Goh GS, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2016) Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 23:331–337 - PubMed
  21. Migliorini F, Rath B, Tingart M, Niewiera M, Eschweiler J (2019) Distal alignment procedures for patellofemoral instability: comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29:1579–1588 - PubMed
  22. Mont MA, Haas S, Mullick T, Hungerford DS (2002) Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone JtSurg Am 84:1977–1981 - PubMed
  23. Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A, Fabrin J (2018) The mark coventry award: patellofemoralarthroplasty results in better range of movement and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. ClinOrthopRelat Res 476:87–100 - PubMed
  24. Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone JtSurg Br 43-B:752–757 - PubMed
  25. Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, Abdel MP, Argenson JN (2015) Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: long term results of partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 97-b:9–15 - PubMed
  26. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96 - PubMed
  27. Tanikawa H, Tada M, Harato K, Okuma K, Nagura T (2017) Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and patellofemoral pressure. J Arthroplasty 32:280–285 - PubMed
  28. Thienpont E, Lonner JH (2014) Coronal alignment of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 21(Suppl 1):S51-57 - PubMed
  29. Tishelman JC, Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Gruskay J, Strickland SM (2019) Patient satisfaction reporting for patellofemoral arthroplasty is significantly lacking: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 47:270–274 - PubMed
  30. van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2017) Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2622–2631 - PubMed
  31. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A (2009) Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop 80:62–66 - PubMed
  32. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A (2010) Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:1066–1071 - PubMed
  33. Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Vander Sloten J, Desloovere K, Bellemans J (2016) Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty reproduces natural patellofemoral joint kinematics when the patella is resurfaced. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3668–3677 - PubMed
  34. Vasta S, Rosi M, Tecame A, Papalia R, Adravanti P (2020) Aiming for anatomical femoral axis on the coronal plane leads to good-to-excellent short-term outcomes in isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.016 - PubMed
  35. Walker LC, Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C et al (2018) The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3333–3341 - PubMed
  36. Zicaro JP, Yacuzzi C, Astoul Bonorino J, Carbo L, Costa-Paz M (2017) Patellofemoral arthritis treated with resurfacing implant: clinical outcome and complications at a minimum two-year follow-up. Knee 24:1485–1491 - PubMed

Publication Types