Display options
Share it on

Heliyon. 2021 Apr 07;7(4):e06689. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06689. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Comparative chemical analysis of Indigenous Nigerian soaps with conventional ones.

Heliyon

John A O Oyekunle, Odunayo T Ore, Oluseyi H Ogunjumelo, Michael S Akanni

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, 220005, Nigeria.

PMID: 33869872 PMCID: PMC8045000 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06689

Abstract

This study compared the chemical properties of the indigenous Nigerian soaps with the conventional soaps in order to determine whether or not they met acceptable standards. The locally made soaps were obtained from markets in Ile-Ife, Osun State and Okitipupa, Ondo State, Nigeria. The soap samples were acid digested and trace metals (Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Hg) in the digested samples were profiled using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Documented techniques were adopted to analyze the soaps for pH, moisture content, free fatty acid, chloride content, free caustic alkali, matters insoluble in water and ethanol. The margin of safety (MoS) and hazard index (HI) associated with the use of the soaps were also evaluated. The locally made soaps had higher physicochemical properties than the conventional soaps. Mercury (Hg) had the highest concentration in the locally made soaps ranging from 106.50 ± 0.23-273.58 ± 0.49 μg/g and 46.35 ± 0.22-55.12 ± 0.65 μg/g in the conventional soaps, while Cd had the least concentration in the locally made soaps ranging from 2.95 ± 0.45-6.05 ± 0.60 μg/g and 2.88 ± 0.11-5.20 ± 0.60 μg/g in the conventional soaps. Although highly mercuric soaps are known to kill bacteria and fungi, the observed MoS (<100) and HI (>1) indicated that the soaps might be safe if only restricted to occasional use by adults and children. A careful preliminary investigation and selection of the raw materials used in the production of indigenous soaps should be considered a necessary step.

© 2021 The Author(s).

Keywords: Cocoa pods; Metals; Palm bunches; Physicochemical properties; Soaps

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Nov;185(11):9663-8 - PubMed
  2. Int J Mol Med. 1998 Jun;1(6):1001-6 - PubMed
  3. Hong Kong Med J. 2003 Oct;9(5):329-34 - PubMed
  4. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(3):484-90 - PubMed
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 17;16(14): - PubMed
  6. West Afr J Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;21(1):51-5 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Jun;35(6):551-72 - PubMed
  8. Toxicol Rep. 2015 May 29;2:880-888 - PubMed
  9. Toxicol Rep. 2019 Aug 24;6:914-923 - PubMed
  10. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2006 Sep 10;1:22 - PubMed
  11. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Feb;49(2):324-41 - PubMed
  12. Toxicol Rep. 2016 Nov 22;3:866-869 - PubMed
  13. Toxicol Rep. 2016 Oct 06;3:796-803 - PubMed
  14. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2018;81(11):432-452 - PubMed

Publication Types