Display options
Cite
Martínez J, Piersol CV, Holloway S, et al. Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP). West J Nurs Res. 2021;43(10):949-961doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274.
Martínez, J., Piersol, C. V., Holloway, S., Terhorst, L., & Leland, N. E. (2021). Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP). Western journal of nursing research, 43(10), 949-961. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211004274
Martínez, Jenny, et al. "Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP)." Western journal of nursing research vol. 43,10 (2021): 949-961. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211004274
Martínez J, Piersol CV, Holloway S, Terhorst L, Leland NE. Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP). West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24. PMID: 33896283; PMCID: PMC8429065.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).

Western journal of nursing research

Jenny Martínez, Catherine Verrier Piersol, Sherrie Holloway, Lauren Terhorst, Natalie E Leland

Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  2. Country Meadows Retirement Community, Hershey, PA, USA.
  3. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

PMID: 33896283 PMCID: PMC8429065 DOI: 10.1177/01939459211004274

Abstract

Evaluating engagement in a research partnership can capture the success and impact of the research team-stakeholder partnerships. This article describes the Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP), an iterative method to develop an evaluation that reflects research team-stakeholder collective values, language, and priorities. We describe our implementation of the SCIP and provide the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation, an evaluation developed in collaboration with our advisory committee. Mean scores across three administrations of the tool remained constant. We monitored responses received from our advisory committee during each administration for changes in scores that guided refinements to our stakeholder engagement strategy. Face validity and acceptability questions showed high satisfaction for the tool's time required to complete, (

Keywords: comparative effectiveness research; research design; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder participation

References

  1. J Community Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):17-32 - PubMed
  2. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Apr;42:19-21 - PubMed
  3. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21 - PubMed
  4. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1692-701 - PubMed
  5. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):521-30 - PubMed
  6. Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316 - PubMed
  7. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):396-406 - PubMed
  8. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216600 - PubMed
  10. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367 - PubMed
  11. J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1937-1951 - PubMed
  12. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206588 - PubMed
  13. Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170 - PubMed
  14. Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):17-31 - PubMed
  15. J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Nov;8(15):1327-1341 - PubMed
  16. Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084 - PubMed
  17. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127 - PubMed
  18. Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100361 - PubMed
  19. J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Jun;6(4):375-389 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support