Display options
Share it on

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec 01;29(23):e1225-e1231. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00862.

Analysis of the Basic Science Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination From 2014 to 2019.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Tony S Shen, Daniel A Driscoll, Bridget K Ellsworth, Ajay Premkumar, Drake G Lebrun, Mathias P G Bostrom, Michael B Cross

Affiliations

  1. From the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

PMID: 33973963 DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00862

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), produced by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), plays an important role in the educational mission of orthopaedic residency programs nationwide. An up-to-date understanding of this examination is critical for programs to develop an appropriate curriculum and for individuals to identify learning resources. This study presents an updated analysis of the basic science section of the OITE from 2014 to 2019.

METHODS: All questions from the OITE from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. Each question from the basic science section was categorized by topic and taxonomy. The use of radiographic images or other clinical media was recorded. The reference section was analyzed for bibliometric factors. Pearson chi-square tests were used as appropriate for statistical comparison.

RESULTS: In total, 185 of 1,600 questions in the basic science section were used over the 6-year study period (11.6%). The proportion of basic science questions ranged from 10.7% to 12.0% from year to year. The most frequently tested topics were cellular and molecular biology (23.8%), physiology/pathophysiology (16.8%), and pharmacology (10.8%). There was an increase in the number of biostatistics questions from 2017 to 2019 compared with the number from 2014 to 2016 (P = 0.02). The most common taxonomic category was knowledge recall (89.7%). A total of 383 references were cited from 122 sources. The 3 most common sources accounting for 44.4% of all citations were produced by the AAOS.

DISCUSSION: The basic science section of the OITE accounts for approximately 11% of all questions, with the most common taxonomy being knowledge recall (89.7%). Recent tests have emphasized biostatistics, highlighting the importance of incorporating biostatistics into residency education. Reference materials produced by the AAOS were highly cited in this section.

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

References

  1. Mankin HJ: The orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE). Clin Orthop Relat Res 1971;75:108-116. - PubMed
  2. Klein GR, Austin MS, Randolph S, Sharkey PF, Hilibrand AS: Passing the boards. J Bone Jt Surg 2004;86:1092-1095. - PubMed
  3. Seybold JD, Srinivasan RC, Goulet JA, Dougherty PJ: Analysis of the orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) musculoskeletal trauma questions. J Surg Educ 2012;69:8-12. - PubMed
  4. Srinivasan RC, Seybold JD, Kadakia AR: Analysis of the foot and ankle section of the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE). Foot Ankle Int 2009;30:1060-1064. - PubMed
  5. Cross MB, Osbahr DC, Nam D, Reinhardt KR, Bostrom MPG, Dines JS: An analysis of the hip and knee reconstruction section of the orthopaedic in-training examination. Orthopedics 2011;34:550-556. - PubMed
  6. Cross MB, Osbahr DC, Gardner MJ, et al.: An analysis of the musculoskeletal trauma section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). J Bone Jt Surg 2011;93:e49-1–6. - PubMed
  7. Synovec J, Plumblee L, Barfield W, Slone H: Orthopedic in-training examination: An analysis of the sports medicine section—An update. J Surg Educ 2019;76:286-293. - PubMed
  8. Lackey WG, Jeray KJ, Tanner S: Analysis of the musculoskeletal trauma section of the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE). J Orthop Trauma 2011;25:238-242. - PubMed
  9. Frassica FJ, Papp D, McCarthy E, Weber K: Analysis of the pathology section of the OITE will aid in trainee preparation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:1323-1328. - PubMed
  10. LeBrun DG, Premkumar A, Ellsworth B, Shen TS, Cross MB, Fufa DT: Analysis of hand Surgery questions on orthopedic in-training examination from 2014 to 2019. Hand (N Y) [published online ahead of print October 26, 2020] doi: 10.1177/1558944720964960. - PubMed
  11. Premkumar A, Lebrun DG, Shen TS, Ellsworth BK, Bostrom MPG, Cross MB: Analysis of hip and knee reconstruction questions on the orthopedic in-training examination. J Arthroplasty 2020;36:1156-1159. - PubMed
  12. Ellsworth BK, Premkumar A, Shen T, Lebrun DG, Cross MB, Widmann RF: An updated analysis of the pediatric section of the orthopaedic in-training examination. J Pediatr Orthop 2020;40:E1017-E1021. - PubMed
  13. Sheibani-Rad S, Arnoczky SP, Walter NE: Analysis of the basic science section of the orthopaedic in-training examination. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1251-e1255. - PubMed
  14. Buckwalter JA, Schumacher R, Albright JP, Cooper RR: Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance. J Med Educ 1981;56:115-121. - PubMed
  15. Schultz EM, Frisby JC, Miskiel SA, Patel DK, Mulcahey MK, Kim TWB: The changing nature of the oncology section of the orthopaedic in-training examination. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:e532-e539. - PubMed
  16. Marker DR, LaPorte DM, Seyler TM, et al.: Orthopaedic Journal publications and their role in the preparation for the orthopaedic in-training examination. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:59-66. - PubMed
  17. Karam MD, Marsh JL: Does a trauma course improve resident performance on the trauma domain of the OITE? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:e19. - PubMed
  18. Taylor BC, Fowler TT: Analysis of the trauma section of the orthopaedic in-training examination. Orthopedics 2011;34:261-266. - PubMed
  19. Barr CR, Cheng I, Chou LB, Hunt KJ: Foot and ankle questions on the orthopaedic in-training examination: Analysis of content, reference, and performance. Orthopedics 2012;35:e880-e888. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types