Display options
Share it on

J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 May 05; doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab122. Epub 2021 May 05.

Correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Austria: trust and the government.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)

Eva Schernhammer, Jakob Weitzer, Manfred D Laubichler, Brenda M Birmann, Martin Bertau, Lukas Zenk, Guido Caniglia, Carlo C Jäger, Gerald Steiner

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  2. Complexity Science Hub, 1080 Vienna, Austria.
  3. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  4. School of Complex Adaptive Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
  5. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.
  6. Institute for Technical Chemistry, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
  7. Department for Knowledge and Communication Management, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems and der Donau, Austria.
  8. Konrado Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
  9. Global Climate Forum, 10178 Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 33948665 PMCID: PMC8135852 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab122

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic surging and new mutations evolving, trust in vaccines is essential.

METHODS: We explored correlates of vaccine hesitancy, considering political believes and psychosocial concepts, conducting a non-probability quota-sampled online survey with 1007 Austrians.

RESULTS: We identified several important correlates of vaccine hesitancy, ranging from demographics to complex factors such as voting behavior or trust in the government. Among those with hesitancy towards a COVID-19 vaccine, having voted for opposition parties (opp) or not voted (novote) were (95% Confidence Intervall (CI)opp, 1.44-2.95) to 2.25-times (95%CInovote, 1.53-3.30) that of having voted for governing parties. Only 46.2% trusted the Austrian government to provide safe vaccines, and 80.7% requested independent scientific evaluations regarding vaccine safety to increase willingness to vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to expected, psychosocial dimensions were only weakly correlated with vaccine hesitancy. However, the strong correlation between distrust in the vaccine and distrust in authorities suggests a common cause of disengagement from public discourse.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health.

Keywords: COVID-19; behaviour; communicable diseases; vaccine hesitancy

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Mar;272:113688 - PubMed
  2. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec 11;: - PubMed
  3. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):125-126 - PubMed
  5. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;9(1): - PubMed
  6. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Jan;129(1-2):59-64 - PubMed
  7. J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78 - PubMed
  8. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;9(1): - PubMed
  9. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594 - PubMed
  10. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2586-2593 - PubMed
  11. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Jan 18;: - PubMed
  12. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):785-788 - PubMed
  13. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Feb 05;: - PubMed
  14. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):775-779 - PubMed
  15. Psychol Med. 2020 Dec 11;:1-15 - PubMed
  16. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017 May-Aug;17(2):161-170 - PubMed
  17. Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1718-1722 - PubMed
  18. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Nov;132(21-22):645-652 - PubMed
  19. Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):8-10 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1296-1297 - PubMed
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 07;17(9): - PubMed
  22. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1049-62 - PubMed
  23. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 - PubMed

Publication Types