Display options
Share it on

Clin Kidney J. 2020 Sep 06;14(5):1412-1418. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa132. eCollection 2021 May.

Sex differences in the vascular access of hemodialysis patients: a cohort study.

Clinical kidney journal

Jennifer M MacRae, Alix Clarke, Sofia B Ahmed, Meghan Elliott, Rob R Quinn, Matthew James, Kathryn King-Shier, Swapnil Hiremath, Matthew J Oliver, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Pietro Ravani,

Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  2. Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  3. Faculty of Nursing and Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  5. Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  6. Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 33959269 PMCID: PMC8087139 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa132

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We describe differences for probability of receiving a fistula attempt, achieving fistula use, remaining catheter-free and the rate of access-related procedures as a function of sex.

METHODS: Prospectively collected vascular access data on incident dialysis patients from five Canadian programs using the Dialysis Measurement Analysis and Reporting System to determine differences in fistula-related outcomes between women and men. The probability of receiving a fistula attempt and the probability of fistula use were determined using binary logistic regression. Catheter and fistula procedure rates were described using Poisson regression. We studied time to fistula attempt and time to fistula use, accounting for competing risks.

RESULTS: We included 1446 (61%) men and 929 (39%) women. Men had a lower body mass index (P < 0.001) and were more likely to have coronary artery disease (P < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001). A total of 688 (48%) men and 403 (43%) women received a fistula attempt. Women were less likely to receive a fistula attempt by 6 months {odds ratio [OR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.79]} and to achieve catheter-free use of their fistula by 1 year [OR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27-0.53)]. At an average of 2.30 access procedures per person-year, there is no difference between women and men [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.07)]. Restricting to those with a fistula attempt, women received more procedures [IRR 1.16 (95% CI 1.04-1.30)] attributed to increased catheter procedures [IRR 1.50 (95% CI 1.27-1.78)]. There was no difference in fistula procedures [IRR women versus men 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.07)].

CONCLUSION: Compared with men, fewer women undergo a fistula attempt. This disparity increases after adjusting for comorbidities. Women have the same number of fistula procedures as men but are less likely to successfully use their fistula.

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.

Keywords: catheter; fistula; hemodialysis; sex differences; vascular access

References

  1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 May;16(5):1449-55 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):226-30 - PubMed
  3. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1726-32 - PubMed
  4. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):155-62 - PubMed
  5. Med Care. 2000 Apr;38(4):354-65 - PubMed
  6. Perit Dial Int. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):41-8 - PubMed
  7. Am J Nephrol. 2019;49(1):11-19 - PubMed
  8. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Oct;29(10):1956-64 - PubMed
  9. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Feb;41(2):429-32 - PubMed
  10. Kidney Int. 2003 Jan;63(1):346-52 - PubMed
  11. Kidney Int. 2002 Jan;61(1):305-16 - PubMed
  12. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb;28(2):613-620 - PubMed
  13. Ren Fail. 2006;28(4):275-81 - PubMed
  14. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):229-235 - PubMed
  15. Croat Med J. 2002 Jun;43(3):306-11 - PubMed
  16. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Mar;14(3):151-164 - PubMed
  17. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1722-30 - PubMed
  18. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3204-12 - PubMed
  19. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Feb;27(2):810-6 - PubMed
  20. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):59-64 - PubMed
  21. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Mar;6(3):575-81 - PubMed
  22. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jun;71(6):793-801 - PubMed
  23. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 May;29(5):685-90 - PubMed
  24. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;37(3):277-286 - PubMed
  25. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(3):465-73 - PubMed
  26. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):134-40 - PubMed
  27. Am J Nephrol. 2018;48(1):4-14 - PubMed
  28. Kidney Int. 2002 Aug;62(2):620-6 - PubMed
  29. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):955-964 - PubMed
  30. Vascular. 2019 Jun;27(3):270-276 - PubMed
  31. Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 04;13:160 - PubMed
  32. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Mar;67(3 Suppl 1):Svii, S1-305 - PubMed

Publication Types