J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3346-3352. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06832-3. Epub 2021 May 06.

Contraceptive Procedures in Internal Medicine Clinics and Resident Education: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Methods, Barriers, and Facilitators.

Journal of general internal medicine

Rachel S Casas, Christine A Prifti, Alexandra E Bachorik, Heather Stuckey, Mindy Sobota, Cynthia H Chuang, Carol S Weisman

PMID: 33959883 PMCID: PMC8606354 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06832-3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants are highly effective and increasingly popular. Internal Medicine (IM) clinics and residency curricula do not routinely include LARCs, which can limit patient access to these methods. In response, internists are integrating LARCs into IM practices and residency training.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the approaches, facilitators, and barriers reported by IM faculty to incorporating LARCs into IM clinics and resident education.

DESIGN: We interviewed faculty who were prior or current LARC providers and/or teachers in 15 IM departments nationally. Each had implemented or attempted to implement LARC training for residents in their IM practice. Semi-structured interviews were used.

PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were a convenience sample of clinicians identified as key informants at each institution.

APPROACH: We used inductive thematic coding analysis to identify themes in the transcribed interviews.

KEY RESULTS: Fourteen respondents currently offered LARCs in their clinic and 12 were teaching these procedures to residents. LARC integration into IM clinics occurred in 3 models: (1) a dedicated procedure or women's health clinic, (2) integration into existing IM clinical sessions, or (3) an interdisciplinary IM and family medicine or gynecology clinic. Balancing clinical and educational priorities was a common theme, with chosen LARC model(s) reflecting the desired priority balance at a given institution. Most programs incorporated a mix of educational modalities, with opportunities based upon resident interest and desired educational goals. Facilitators and barriers related to clinical (equipment, workflow), educational (curriculum, outcomes), or process considerations (procedural volume, credentialing). Participants reported that support from multiple stakeholders including patients, residents, leadership, and other departments was necessary for success.

CONCLUSION: The model for integration of LARCs into IM clinics and resident education depends upon the clinical resources, patient needs, stakeholder support, and educational goals of the program.

© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Keywords: contraception; graduate medical education; internal medicine; women’s health

References

1. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):e44-e48 - PubMed
2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117 - PubMed
3. Womens Health Issues. 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):131-4 - PubMed
4. Aust Fam Physician. 2016 Nov;45(11):837-841 - PubMed
5. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):291-7 - PubMed
6. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1061-1062 - PubMed
7. Fam Med. 2015 Jan;47(1):22-30 - PubMed
8. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):947-55 - PubMed
9. Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):48-54 - PubMed
10. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Dec;52(6):534-9 - PubMed
11. Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):472-8 - PubMed
12. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):127-31 - PubMed
13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):352.e1-14 - PubMed
14. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Aug;23(8):707-13 - PubMed
15. Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):578-83 - PubMed
16. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52 - PubMed
17. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(3):1-103 - PubMed
18. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't