Display options
Share it on

Materials (Basel). 2021 May 11;14(10). doi: 10.3390/ma14102473.

Healing of Post-Extraction Sockets Filled with Anorganic Bovine Bone and Covered with a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix. Radiological 2D and 3D Results of a Pilot Study to Assess Dimensional Stability.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Tiziano Testori, Matteo Antonio Deflorian, Federico Mandelli, Giulia Attardo, Carlo Maiorana, Massimo Del Fabbro, Raffaele Vinci

Affiliations

  1. Dental Clinic, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
  2. Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 58259, USA.
  3. Section of Implantology and Oral Rehabilitation, Dental Clinic, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.
  4. Dental School, Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  5. Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  6. Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  7. Dental Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  8. Graduate school of oral surgery, Dental School, Vita-Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  9. Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.

PMID: 34064679 PMCID: PMC8151327 DOI: 10.3390/ma14102473

Abstract

Analysis of short-term results regarding dimensional stability of post-extraction sockets managed via a preservation protocol using deproteinized bovine bone matrix and a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Materials and methods Fifteen patients needing extraction of one single-rooted premolar tooth were treated in a pilot study. Five patients were treated in each centre. After tooth extraction, sockets were filled with anorganic bovine bone matrix and covered with a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Six months later, implants were placed. Dimensional changes in the treated sites were digitally evaluated using the best-fit superimposition of pre-and post-socket preservation models. Results After six months of healing, the vertical reduction of the grafted sites was 0.31 ± 0.24 mm (

Keywords: 3D evaluation; extraction socket; implantology; ridge preservation; socket seal

References

  1. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18 - PubMed
  3. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):341-63 - PubMed
  4. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215 - PubMed
  5. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):194-210 - PubMed
  6. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Feb;16(1):1-20 - PubMed
  7. J Periodontol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1768-74 - PubMed
  8. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23 - PubMed
  9. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Jan;39(1):91-7 - PubMed
  11. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Dec;17(6):606-14 - PubMed
  12. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1049-61 - PubMed
  13. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):941-6 - PubMed
  14. J Periodontol. 1998 Sep;69(9):1044-9 - PubMed
  15. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217 - PubMed
  16. J Prosthodont. 1999 Jun;8(2):106-18 - PubMed
  17. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Apr;35(4):356-63 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8 - PubMed
  20. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2 - PubMed
  21. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7 - PubMed
  22. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:22-38 - PubMed

Publication Types