Display options
Share it on

Future Sci OA. 2021 Mar 29;7(5):FSO697. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0197.

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor strongly predicts global mortality in acute heart failure patients: insight from the STADE-HF registry.

Future science OA

Fabien Huet, Anne-Marie Dupuy, Claire Duflos, Cintia Azara Reis, Nils Kuster, Sylvain Aguilhon, Jean-Paul Cristol, François Roubille

Affiliations

  1. Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  2. PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR, 9214, Montpellier, 34090, France.
  3. Department of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, 34090, France.
  4. Medico-Economic Research Unit, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, 34090, France.

PMID: 34046195 PMCID: PMC8147742 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0197

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) could be a valuable prognostic indicator remains uncertain.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients from STADE-HF (Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenesis-2 as a Help for Management of Diagnosis, Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure) were included for analysis.

RESULTS: 95 patients were included. The suPAR level of expression was significantly higher in the group of patients who died at one month (7.90 ± 4.35 ng/ml vs 11.94 ± 6.86 ng/ml; p < 0.05) or 1 year (7.28 ± 4.27 ng/ml vs 11.81 ± 4.88 ng/ml; p < 0.01), but there was no significant difference according to the readmission.

CONCLUSION: High suPAR levels during hospitalization for acute heart failure were highly predictive for the risk of mortality, but not the risk of readmission.

© 2021 Fabien Huet.

Keywords: acute heart failure; biomarkers; prognosis; suPAR

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with th

References

  1. Lancet. 2011 Feb 5;377(9764):469-76 - PubMed
  2. J Intern Med. 2010 Sep;268(3):296-308 - PubMed
  3. Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1404-13 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 27;8(7): - PubMed
  5. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 24;9(1):13783 - PubMed
  6. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 18;6(2): - PubMed
  7. Postgrad Med J. 2018 Sep;94(1115):517-524 - PubMed
  8. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Feb 03;: - PubMed
  9. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;7(2):774-778 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1119-1131 - PubMed
  11. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;67(6):544-51 - PubMed
  12. Circulation. 2002 Mar 5;105(9):1135-43 - PubMed
  13. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:45-50 - PubMed
  14. Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Mar;21(2):169-76 - PubMed
  15. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 15;110(12):1756-63 - PubMed
  16. Panminerva Med. 2020 Sep;62(3):135-142 - PubMed
  17. J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Apr 30;10(6):1801 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975 - PubMed
  19. Circulation. 2012 Sep 25;126(13):1596-604 - PubMed
  20. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):280-286 - PubMed
  21. Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Mar;490:167-171 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 2002 Dec 19-26;420(6917):868-74 - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157159 - PubMed
  24. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Apr;5(4):268-277 - PubMed
  25. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2230-2239 - PubMed

Publication Types