Display options
Cite
Gasik M, Lambert F, Bacevic M. Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(11)doi: 10.3390/ma14112845.
Gasik, M., Lambert, F., & Bacevic, M. (2021). Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 14(11), . https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112845
Gasik, Michael, et al. "Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants." Materials (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 14,11 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112845
Gasik M, Lambert F, Bacevic M. Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 26;14(11). doi: 10.3390/ma14112845. PMID: 34073388; PMCID: PMC8199480.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Materials (Basel). 2021 May 26;14(11). doi: 10.3390/ma14112845.

Biomechanical Properties of Bone and Mucosa for Design and Application of Dental Implants.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Michael Gasik, France Lambert, Miljana Bacevic

Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University Foundation, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
  2. Dental Biomaterials Research Unit, University of Liege, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

PMID: 34073388 PMCID: PMC8199480 DOI: 10.3390/ma14112845

Abstract

Dental implants' success comprises their proper stability and adherence to different oral tissues (integration). The implant is exposed to different mechanical stresses from swallowing, mastication and parafunctions for a normal tooth, leading to the simultaneous mechanical movement and deformation of the whole structure. The knowledge of the mechanical properties of the bone and gingival tissues in normal and pathological conditions is very important for the successful conception of dental implants and for clinical practice to access and prevent potential failures and complications originating from incorrect mechanical factors' combinations. The challenge is that many reported biomechanical properties of these tissues are substantially scattered. This study carries out a critical analysis of known data on mechanical properties of bone and oral soft tissues, suggests more convenient computation methods incorporating invariant parameters and non-linearity with tissues anisotropy, and applies a consistent use of these properties for in silico design and the application of dental implants. Results show the advantages of this approach in analysis and visualization of stress and strain components with potential translation to dental implantology.

Keywords: biomechanics; bone; dental implants; in silico; soft tissues; stiffness

References

  1. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Sep;30(9):892-902 - PubMed
  2. J Biomech. 2011 Feb 3;44(3):450-4 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Aug;17(7 ( Pt 2)):516-24 - PubMed
  4. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2012 Jun-Jul;28(6-7):604-25 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Dec;99(6):2369-78 - PubMed
  6. J Biomech Eng. 2010 Jul;132(7):074502 - PubMed
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975 Nov-Dec;(113):15-26 - PubMed
  8. Dent Mater. 2004 Sep;20(7):623-9 - PubMed
  9. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Nov 30;6:187 - PubMed
  10. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1317-29 - PubMed
  11. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):415-21 - PubMed
  12. J Periodontol. 2011 Aug;82(8):1178-86 - PubMed
  13. Adv Healthc Mater. 2012 Jan 11;1(1):117-27 - PubMed
  14. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Mar;47(3):317-29 - PubMed
  15. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2005 Mar;3(3):147-71 - PubMed
  16. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:425421 - PubMed
  17. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Jun;46(3):152-65 - PubMed
  18. Shikwa Gakuho. 1972 Jun;72(6):17-45 - PubMed
  19. Med Eng Phys. 1995 Jul;17(5):347-55 - PubMed
  20. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Dec;6(6):602-611 - PubMed
  21. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 19;14(2): - PubMed
  22. J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Apr;59(2):84-95 - PubMed
  23. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:295-308 - PubMed
  24. J R Soc Interface. 2015 Aug 6;12(109):20150325 - PubMed
  25. J Biomech. 1989;22(8-9):837-44 - PubMed
  26. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):30-7 - PubMed
  27. Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;14(1): - PubMed
  28. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Apr;4(3):269-74 - PubMed
  29. Dent Mater J. 1985 Jun;4(1):47-53 - PubMed
  30. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2017 Jul 31;18(1):550-562 - PubMed
  31. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:55-67 - PubMed
  32. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):210-3 - PubMed
  33. Int Dent J. 1971 Dec 4;21(4):430-41 - PubMed
  34. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):e201-e207 - PubMed
  35. Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 11;20(1): - PubMed
  36. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015 Aug;14(4):679-91 - PubMed
  37. Biomaterials. 1997 Jul;18(14):995-9 - PubMed
  38. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2012 May;28(5):574-88 - PubMed
  39. J Periodontol. 2020 Sep;91(9):1213-1224 - PubMed
  40. Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Feb 13;74(7):1250-1253 - PubMed
  41. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Oct;2(5):410-32 - PubMed
  42. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Aug;18(2):116-21 - PubMed
  43. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):357-68 - PubMed
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 01;17(13): - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support