Display options
Share it on

Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 05; doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02772-2. Epub 2021 Jun 05.

A retrospective cohort study assessing acute kidney injury and renal recovery among septic patients empirically treated with vancomycin piperacillin-tazobactam versus vancomycin cefepime.

Internal and emergency medicine

Brian Pacca Elliott, Michael M Tang, Joshua Alexander Madden, Ronald James Markert, Steven Dale Burdette, Craig Matthew Pleiman, Emily Claire Speelmon

Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, USA. [email protected].
  3. Department of Internal Medicine and Neurology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, 128 E Apple St, Weber CHE Building, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA. [email protected].
  4. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA.
  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, USA.
  6. Department of Internal Medicine and Neurology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, 128 E Apple St, Weber CHE Building, Dayton, OH, 45409, USA.
  7. Department of Infectious Diseases, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA.
  8. Department of Pharmacy, Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, OH, USA.

PMID: 34089468 PMCID: PMC8178657 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02772-2

Abstract

Vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a commonly used antimicrobial regimen for septic patients. VPT is more nephrotoxic than other regimens such as vancomycin plus cefepime (VC) when given over several days. This risk of nephrotoxicity is less clear when VPT is given for initial empiric therapy in sepsis and de-escalated quickly based on evolving clinical information. The objective of this study was to assess nephrotoxicity among septic patients empirically treated with either VPT or VC at initial clinical presentation. We conducted a retrospective study of septic patients who received VPT or VC within 12 h of presentation to the emergency department. The primary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery 72 h after presentation. For the total of 418 patients, 306 received VPT and 112 received VC. Rates of AKI at 72 h were 15.2% for VPT patients and 11.0% for VC patients [p = 0.44]. Among patients with AKI at presentation, 16.3% of VPT patients had AKI at 72 h compared to 8.9% of VC patients [p = 0.19]. Among those without AKI at presentation, 14.2% VPT patients and 16.7% VC patients had AKI at 72 h [p = 0.71]. Renal recovery rates for patients with AKI at presentation were 42.3% for VPT patients versus 40.3% for VC patients [p = 0.78]. In-hospital renal replacement therapy occurred in 6.2% VPT patients and 0.9% VC patients [p = 0.024]. Therefore, initial empiric therapy with VPT in sepsis may not confer increased risk of AKI when de-escalated appropriately.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Anti-bacterial agents; Critical care; Renal insufficiency; Sepsis; Septic shock

References

  1. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 - PubMed
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202682 - PubMed
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):116-123 - PubMed
  4. Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55 - PubMed
  5. Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jul;34(7):662-9 - PubMed
  6. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 24;68(9):1456-1462 - PubMed
  7. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):1784-1792 - PubMed
  8. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71 - PubMed
  9. J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):711-7 - PubMed
  10. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep 7;15(9):1358-1360 - PubMed
  11. JAMA. 2005 Aug 17;294(7):813-8 - PubMed
  12. Cureus. 2019 Dec 13;11(12):e6378 - PubMed
  13. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):859-64 - PubMed
  14. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):461-70 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249 - PubMed
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 May 23;60(6):3743-50 - PubMed
  17. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):858-868 - PubMed
  18. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637 - PubMed
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2): - PubMed
  20. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):863-72 - PubMed
  21. Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):157-163 - PubMed
  22. J Pharm Pract. 2017 Apr;30(2):209-213 - PubMed
  23. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):784-791 - PubMed
  24. Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1317-21 - PubMed
  25. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Jun;20(6):O384-9 - PubMed

Publication Types